DoomYoshi wrote:Vio, let's just say we are playing a game in which there is a confirmed innocent child. The mod comes out and says that player x is town and that if player x dies, town loses.
Then let's imagine that the watcher says "I don't want to report who I watched". Does that still make sense? It doesn't. Now my example may be extreme, but it's not too far from what actually happened.
It makes perfect sense, and I think it's exactly what happened. But I understand Dro'z viewpoint on it.
In fact, I think I know exactly who Droz watched, and exactly which person visited the person that Droz watched. And I think that person would be very happy that Droz didn't say anything about it. Just a hunch I have.
Think about what type of people would be visiting this "innocent child."
Could be the mafia, trying to kill them. But since the "innocent child" didn't die, this isn't likely (course that mafia member could've been roleblocked). Droz might consider this and be possibly suspicious of this person. But no need to let this mafia member know that he/she has aroused suspicion. Best for Droz to keep this quiet until more information is known.
Could be a positive town role that visited the "innocent child." In this case, why draw attention to this for the mafia to note. I understand Droz keeping silent in this scenario as well.
Bruceswar: I have big news coming out soonish
Violet: oh, what big news?
Bruceswar: I am leaving KORT to go to RA