oh well newguy, I guess you won't let me be lazy and you want me to do a propper post to say why I thought you acted wierd this game. Ok then, let's go post per post.
new guy1 wrote:Vote ghostly
just because my vote isnt on anyone and I havent joke voted anyone
just a joke vote, on your twin brother so you take the minimum risk.
new guy1 wrote:
soundman wrote:Unvote. Well no one has done anything suspicious yet so that leaves us with a random lynch. It's looking like Vodean is going to be the target at this point. I say if he has an important role then he should claim.
Well if you want to do a random lynch, then why dont you look at Edocsil's alternative? He posted right above you suggesting vodean/betiko and you seem to be settled for just random lynching vodean. Since from past experience vodean wont claim and will likely take the lynch, I would rather look into betiko because if we discover he is a PR or something then we can always gather enough pressure to lynch vodean in the end. This is a relatively silent game, so I guess it needs to start somewhere, vote soundman
for being content with a random lynch.
on this one I have to agree with you, soundman said something strange and deserved a vote
new guy1 wrote:Betiko, was that a joke vote, or a legit vote?
was in between, but already answered
new guy1 wrote:I understand, but being a smart ass isnt a crime either.
new guy1 wrote:Sorry for the double post, its not that Im defending him, I just dont see much there.
why do you need to justify yourself like that? you are double posting and overjustifying...
new guy1 wrote:I wouldnt say he's finding out, because he knew nobody wanted to do it so he must have predicted it was a possibility. Im not voting for edoc as I know (and you probably can tell from my past meta) I say dumb shit on day one and get more shit for it, so I can understand that he was trying to get the game moving and it ended badly because of his wording. Therefore, I will just keep my vote where it is. I do agree with ghost however that he did go completely 180 on the meta of Betiko, but at this point it seems he will get lynched with or without my vote.
talking about edoc's case. fair enough.
new guy1 wrote:Very nice eyes, I completely looked over it, Im guessing a double voter.
neendrel sees a double voter.
new guy1 wrote:Well, give me the player you think is scum, and since Im not going for your case, I will put my vote on them. That way, if town decides to lynch you, no harm no foul. If we decide we will pursue him, it's one less vote that you must gather to turn it around.
you are basically proposing edoc to bandwagon on any case he proposes, whoever it is. You are now OMGUSing me for putting vote number 2 on your ass to get things moving?
new guy1 wrote:I will vote IB like I said I would.
so edoc tells you IB and doesn't vote, you jump on it.
new guy1 wrote:Hey vodean. If you read, I'm only voting so that if we decide the case on edocsil is not a good one then we can turn the wagon to someone whom he believes to be scummy.
fair enough, but if edoc is scum he could point out a fellow scum to gain brownie points.
new guy1 wrote:Ill move my vote to gregwolf, as he hasnt added anything and I would rather give edoc a 50% in exchange for an inactive player. Unvote, vote gregwolf
you are vote number 4
new guy1 wrote:Does this mean you are in the same boat as edocsil, not giving information? I understand that theres not alot on you, but what do you expect day one cases to be made of? The scummiest thing that we can catch anyone on is either somewhere where the scum slips or inactivity.
new guy1 wrote:Last post was on page 6, you made no post of substance (before being voted you posted confirmation, zombies!!!!, and a post about vodean being at l4 or something), therefore you did not even add in on the conversation while kanin at least was here, posting, and trying to find a case. You sat in the bleachers.
new guy1 wrote:We have around 5 hours left guys. Since greg is on the spot, you should probably claim.
new guy1 wrote:I feel like there are some townies with night roles, just a gut feeling. Vodean is soft claiming he had the double vote yesterday, so that means whoever has day six must also have a double vote (going by that logic). I dont believe there are multiple mafia factions as then town would just have the shit end of the stick and plus if that were true then when each of the mafia killed someone there would be multiple days killed and therefore doom would have to pick between the days and stuff. FOS Kanin for the WIFOM.
first phrase is more than obvious. I don't understand you logic for the rest about 3rdparty impossible and i disagree.
new guy1 wrote:Well, you are wrong, but I understand we dont have much to go on today, as it is pretty much another day 1 (besides the lynch part). If you were to not take your quote out of context, I did not believe edoc to be scummy even though he was amounting a large group of votes on himself. He softclaimed being a town powerrole, and that is why I decided to put my vote where he thought it was needed, because the way he worded it, I did not think there was a way to get enough votes off of him and on to the scummiest person in 24 hours. Therefore, wherever he was going to put his vote, I thought it would be better for day 1 to put my vote in the same place. He was soft claiming a power role, and I would rather not kill a power role on day one. That is why I was going to cluster my vote with his, because it would possibly save him. Now obviously IDK if he is a power role for real, but I thought that was information I should find out another day instead of lynching him because he would not claim. Now IDK where I was sucking up to him (and I understand that you could not find a better word for it), as I even said "not to suck up" or something like that in my second post "defending" (for lack of a better word) him. It was a double post, and I wanted to make it clear. I was not trying to gain town cred as I dont need it, and I nudged Gregwolf into a claim because it was his last chance of living while we gained information elsewhere. I have never seen a game that getting someone to claim (after we pressured him) was scummy. I mean really?
Ok you know what, after re-reading all your posts I realize I quite agree with all your plays, I guess I had other impressions before looking at it in details. therefore, unvote
Secondly about IB. I have to say I did think of it. Edoc brings IB as an alternative, NG1 follows to counterballance the votes on edoc, and before this goes further, IB decides to change his strategy... 20 minutes after answering edoc, he searches an alternative and goes for the less active, which is gregwolf. It could be a great mafia play, but I don't know. I don't like to be a whistleblower, but 3 minutes after posting the case about gregwolf, he sent me a PM to tell me "check the game". Why to me? and we are not masoned. there was 24H left, no emergency. Any other received the same PM, vodean? my first thought when I opened the PM before updating myself to the game was that edoc was in trouble and there were good evidence about him being the PR he softclaimed and I had to remove my vote immediately but no.
so IB, please tell me why you felt the urge to send me this PM.
fastposted by IB