Whatsausage wrote:X-Stor-X wrote: Besides that have any other questions for me?
Since you have asked that more than once, I have one. What is your read on yourself so far?
silly question
obviously im town
Moderator: Community Team
Whatsausage wrote:X-Stor-X wrote: Besides that have any other questions for me?
Since you have asked that more than once, I have one. What is your read on yourself so far?
By someone doing something "serious" and others reacting to it. For example: X-Stor-X requested to end the joke vote phase. You responded by joining with others to turn on him for it. Subsequently I voted for you to observed your reaction to me doing so. Let's see what I got.HotShot53 wrote:My vote was a half joke vote/half I don't know what else to do with my vote since as you said, how else are you going to decide who to pressure first?
You start off with what I am going to characterise as an attempt to garner sympathy.HotShot53 wrote:I think it's amazing anyone claims or gets lynched in these games, since it's apparently a crime to make the 3rd or 4th vote on someone. While yes, sometimes scum could bandwagon to get a quick lynch, I think often it's town who are just convinced by previous arguments on the person enough to want to see a claim. I mean isn't that the whole point of an argument is to convince other people to join you in voting that person? Sorry for the little rant, I'm just often afraid of voting for cases that I think have decent merit just because I know if I do that 2-3 times I'll get railroaded as a bandwagonner...
Next you try to downplay the significance of your vote and retract it. In asking that particular question you seem to have missed what exactly happened when X-Stor-X requested an end to joke voting; it ended, albeit not everyone caught on at the same rate.HotShot53 wrote:My vote was a half joke vote/half I don't know what else to do with my vote since as you said, how else are you going to decide who to pressure first? I did ask the question you were going to ask, and as I stated when I made the vote, he wanted pressure on someone, so I gave it to him. Since by his posts since then I'm guessing he is probably more likely town, I will unvote
X-Stor-X wrote:Whatsausage wrote:X-Stor-X wrote: Besides that have any other questions for me?
Since you have asked that more than once, I have one. What is your read on yourself so far?
silly question
obviously im town
X-Stor-X wrote:@whatsausage back to you, you have asked now can you tell?
what do you think of spiesr
In both these games we see similar opening. Joking a bit mixed with lots of down time. It takes several days for Jonty to "decided" on anything it seems.
(i would include the previous game on BB, still no idea what he is, but he did end up voting with a simple 1 liner for a reason and stayed quiet) The importance of him in BB and this game is the drastic change in behavior.
I am also backing this up with the 2 previous links. He is clearly Changed his play style, and is doing something DIFFERENT. With 2 previous games of flipping town, a VT and a Power role. Leads me to believe he is not playing his normal townie game. This i find Scummy.
Now we have his case, this is a scummy case coming from Jonty for a few reasons.
1. as touched before it is DIFFERENT than his normal play.
a. it is the longest case i've scene him make early on day 1.
b. it is the most in depth case i've read from him on day 1
2. He talks about 2 people, about how the actions have come how silly they are etc. And in the end it seems he is flipping a coin as to who he is voting. (how ever he does give slight reason for the difference that does look better for jonty )
jak111 wrote:I explain that I would of easily taken it off if it was not for Anark's reaction, and my crummy case turned out into a good lead for a Day 1 with no info.
jonty125 wrote:jak111 wrote:I explain that I would of easily taken it off if it was not for Anark's reaction, and my crummy case turned out into a good lead for a Day 1 with no info.
The quote he says he does not mind claiming basically.
Jmac1026 wrote:A lynch (or even a case) based completely on someone's meta is something I really could not support. Especially when the pseudo-meta is "he is posting way more than he normally does." That just seems ridiculous.
Roger Dodger wrote:ok, i am trying to get back into the swing of things so, with that said, Out of everything i have read so far, this statement makes the most sense..
So i had the experience of playing with Jonty in my previous game. (he has yet flipped ) And just from that i know something has changed for him. I took a quick look at his posts in
Emotions Mafia (survives to end as VTown)
viewtopic.php?f=213&t=202851&sk=a&start=90
And A Cino Filled Mafia (2 time cop dies night 6)In both these games we see similar opening. Joking a bit mixed with lots of down time. It takes several days for Jonty to "decided" on anything it seems.
(i would include the previous game on BB, still no idea what he is, but he did end up voting with a simple 1 liner for a reason and stayed quiet) The importance of him in BB and this game is the drastic change in behavior.
I am also backing this up with the 2 previous links. He is clearly Changed his play style, and is doing something DIFFERENT. With 2 previous games of flipping town, a VT and a Power role. Leads me to believe he is not playing his normal townie game. This i find Scummy.
Now we have his case, this is a scummy case coming from Jonty for a few reasons.
1. as touched before it is DIFFERENT than his normal play.
a. it is the longest case i've scene him make early on day 1.
b. it is the most in depth case i've read from him on day 1
2. He talks about 2 people, about how the actions have come how silly they are etc. And in the end it seems he is flipping a coin as to who he is voting. (how ever he does give slight reason for the difference that does look better for jonty )
I think when u change the way you play the game says a lot about what role you play. I have not played with Jonty and i could be wrong but, my gut is saying that this could be right.
VOTE JONTY
I am sticking to this until someone says different.
Iron Butterfly wrote:I was not asking a question so much as I was commenting.
The Meta's we place on others is based on personal perceptions. One can not create a Meta of someone without playing with them in my opinion. reading the archives does not do it.
"I think when u change the way you play the game says a lot about what role you play. I have not played with Jonty and i could be wrong but, my gut is saying that this could be right."
The above quote makes no sense in the first sentence. The second sentence says they have not played with Jonty AND they could be wrong BUT their gut says its right.
They may as well have writen, "I am going to take a wild guess and Vote Jonty. I could be right or I could be wrong."
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users