Conquer Club

This is an idea I came up with while I was sitting in the back of Social Studies. Just wondering about interest.


Update 1


Original


I am currently wokring on a better model.

I mentioned a similar idea to cairnswk a few weeks back.

One idea I had envisioned revolved around two sides of the map...the two trenches...and a central "No Man's Land" area that could be bomarded by each side. In the "No Man's Land" there would be various barbed wire obstacles, etc, but also a few "Safe Haven" trenches/holes that couldn't be hit by bomardments from either side.

The idea was to really try to play up the theme that once you leave the "Trench"...you are risking a lot.


--Andy

Yeah that's what I was thinking. You lose armies in No Man's Land except for said Safe Havens. Is that already started, or can I continue on it?

It's not started, so by all means go ahead. I don't make maps, I just move them through the creation process.

Goodluck!


--Andy

I really like your map so far, Your draft is looking good

Thanks.

One problem.
Every map who have botleneck profile is not good,belive me i try with Ancient Egypt map.

All right, I'll work on a couple entrance / exits.

Only problem is the fact that its a six playre game and not a 2 player game.

Well, in all honesty, so was Siege!

werent there tunnels that were meant to undermine trenches and counter tunnels?

what i mean is they are a good excuse to add entrances and stuff

Yeah, I'll put that in the next version. From the trench to the other trench or to the middle of no mans land is the question.

AndyDufresne wrote:I mentioned a similar idea to cairnswk a few weeks back.

One idea I had envisioned revolved around two sides of the map...the two trenches...and a central "No Man's Land" area that could be bomarded by each side. In the "No Man's Land" there would be various barbed wire obstacles, etc, but also a few "Safe Haven" trenches/holes that couldn't be hit by bomardments from either side.

The idea was to really try to play up the theme that once you leave the "Trench"...you are risking a lot.


--Andy

Fog of War......

insomniacdude wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:I mentioned a similar idea to cairnswk a few weeks back.

One idea I had envisioned revolved around two sides of the map...the two trenches...and a central "No Man's Land" area that could be bomarded by each side. In the "No Man's Land" there would be various barbed wire obstacles, etc, but also a few "Safe Haven" trenches/holes that couldn't be hit by bomardments from either side.

The idea was to really try to play up the theme that once you leave the "Trench"...you are risking a lot.


--Andy

Fog of War......

Huh?

meens you don't know if hes in nomans land

Yeah, I suppose. I have always hated FoW tho personally...

FoW would make bombarding into the No-Man's land interesting...but that is aside the point for now.

Back on map topic.


--Andy

bump!

AndyDufresne wrote:FoW would make bombarding into the No-Man's land interesting...but that is aside the point for now.

Back on map topic.


--Andy

If you can bombard somewhere - you can see it...

C.

Great idea. We already have several of WWII. The First War would make a nice difference

bump

can you give another update

working on it. I have a huge paper for english to work on and whenever I work on it my mom comes in and checks on me to make sure that i'm not doing this. Update soon.

New update in 5 minutes!