Page 1 of 1
GIANT Risk
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:07 pmby Blueneutron
Anyone like the idea of a larger map with more territories meant to take longer and have more neutrals? Say, twice as large as the Realms map, but like normal gameplay?
It could be a land-mass type game, rather than something surreal-based. Also, a longer lasting game, but balanced by high armies each turn. 6 players could be battling at a time with as much as 150 armies each.
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:32 pmby kagetora
isnt that basically what World2.0 is?
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:56 pmby whitestazn88
wasnt pixel world developed to be like that?
well, sort of
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:30 pmby Blueneutron
World 2.0 is sort of like that, but
1) It's an older map and sort of boring after the 20th time
2) There aren't a lot of neutrals
3) There's no megabattles, i.e. 100 armies for each player
I'm thinking more along the lines of epic
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:23 amby kagetora
1. I only play maps of those size for team games
2. I don't like fighting neutrals, they're a waste of time
3. OK
I mean, if you get it going, I'll play it
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:44 amby mibi
There is a map,
soon to start development, that when finished will be in the 400-600 territory range.
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:51 amby lord voldemort
there is also world 3.0 which is on hold til map sizes get changed
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:13 pmby kagetora
isnt 300 excessive? i mean, i think w2.0 has too much
400-600, wow. that is just overly eccentric
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:23 pmby gimil
kagetora wrote:isnt 300 excessive? i mean, i think w2.0 has too much
400-600, wow. that is just overly eccentric
not a chance . . .
the more the merrier
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:44 pmby Liam5129
sweet go hamsters!-L5129 little bro of W123
Posted:
Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:43 pmby mibi
I also have another map in development that will be around 1000 territories on one map.
Posted:
Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:50 pmby hecter
mibi wrote:I also have another map in development that will be around 1000 territories on one map.
I don't envy the guy that does that xml...
Posted:
Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:59 pmby Coleman
hecter wrote:mibi wrote:I also have another map in development that will be around 1000 territories on one map.
I don't envy the guy that does that xml...
I don't envy me either.