Page 1 of 1

COLD WAR MAP

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:41 pm
by w3a2
Image

supposedly a map layout (taken from this site: http://www.eheartland.com/) on what the US/USSR cold war was really focusing on.

Still pondering ideas as to how it would work, but before any real work takes place, I want to know whether it's even worth looking into.

If i do go ahead with this, it will be my first map, and so i dont plan on going over the top with stuff, but an idea i have is only 2 continents (USSR Alliance, US Alliance) and when one holds on continent, aside from bonuses, it opens up lines of attack that are normally restricted.

making sense? is it even possible? dunno - but would like some serious input.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:43 pm
by P Gizzle
i like the idea, but not the map. maybe you could use a regular map of US and USSR, but have areas like NYC and Moscow connected or areas where nuking would possible occur

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:52 pm
by w3a2
i went for this layout because of 2 reasons, 1, it's what they apparently worked from in the 60s, and 2 it's a different look at the world

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:54 pm
by P Gizzle
hmmm, yeah, true. i just think a regular map would look better, the other one hurts my eyes

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:55 pm
by soccerstud38
yeah, good idea but the map needs vast improvements.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:01 pm
by w3a2
soccerstud38 wrote:yeah, good idea but the map needs vast improvements.


improvements such as...?

like i said, i'm not going to spend any time on this until i have a clear direction

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:28 pm
by gavin_sidhu
The problem with putting the map this way is that it looks very similar to the arctic map in construction. Is that island in the top left corner Australia? if it is, Australia im pretty sure was US aligned.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:49 am
by Lupo
gavin_sidhu wrote:The problem with putting the map this way is that it looks very similar to the arctic map in construction. Is that island in the top left corner Australia? if it is, Australia im pretty sure was US aligned.


I think is the insland of Kalimantan, also known as Borneo, in Indonesia.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:07 am
by gavin_sidhu
Lupo wrote:
gavin_sidhu wrote:The problem with putting the map this way is that it looks very similar to the arctic map in construction. Is that island in the top left corner Australia? if it is, Australia im pretty sure was US aligned.


I think is the insland of Kalimantan, also known as Borneo, in Indonesia.
Well thats a screwed up Borneo. Ur right i think though, cos then island next to it is Sulawesi.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:12 pm
by happysadfun
What would set this map apart from other worldset maps? Add something Cold-war-y. Right now it looks like a Northern Hemisphere map.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:16 pm
by reverend_kyle
happysadfun wrote:What would set this map apart from other worldset maps? Add something Cold-war-y. Right now it looks like a Northern Hemisphere map.



are you retarded or can you just not read?


w3a2 wrote:If i do go ahead with this, it will be my first map, and so i dont plan on going over the top with stuff, but an idea i have is only 2 continents (USSR Alliance, US Alliance) and when one holds on continent, aside from bonuses, it opens up lines of attack that are normally restricted.

making sense? is it even possible? dunno - but would like some serious input.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:20 pm
by happysadfun
Two continents is bull, is what I was trying to say.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:54 pm
by RobinJ
^
it does look interesting but i don't know how it would actually play

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:58 pm
by P Gizzle
i think nuke lines would be cool. one from D.C. to Moscow, maybe one from NYC to Stalingrad, u get the point

PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:54 pm
by gavin_sidhu
happysadfun wrote:Two continents is bull, is what I was trying to say.
Maybe there should be subcontinents.