n00blet wrote:What desires? I haven't stated anything of the like, other than you considering the possibility that you need to take a step off your high horse to actually listen to logic (which Spock would approve of, suprisingly enough).Woodruff wrote:n00blet wrote:Note the flames within your arguments about how good it is that FW is gone. Do you know how to spell hypocrite?Woodruff wrote:n00blet wrote:SILENCE FOOLS!
Responses that need to require scrolling to be able to read should arbitrarily be deleted from now on, because no one reads them, and no one cares about your "logical" arguments. Goodness gracious. This is worse than FW ever was...
They have medication for your inability to concentrate for slightly longer amounts of time. You should check that out.
Hmmm...you call me a fool, and that's ok. I suggest a way that you can assist with a problem that you admit you're experiencing and you want to claim it's a flame? I was simply pointing out that if you don't have the ability to concentrate long enough to read the posts (which you admit), then there is medication for that problem. No flame. However, you are certainly calling me a name.
I know you're trying REALLY HARD to justify your desires, but this desperation on your part really is just making you look bad, rather than giving the impression that you have a real point.
In any event, this isn't worth the time or effort it takes to type responses anymore, as they are obviously going right over your head. Either that, or I'm just going to make myself look bad....
You stated "Note the flames within your arguments about how good it is that FW is gone. Do you know how to spell hypocrite?", and yet I've not made ANY "flames within my arguments about how good it is that FW is gone". So yes...I guess you are.