Conquer Club

Manual Initial Troop Placement

Archival storage for Announcements. Peruse old Announcements here!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Queen_Herpes on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:12 am

default on start game menu should be automatic. Manual deploy takes additional time.

There shouldn't be fog on the manual deploy, or there should be an option to fog on or off on manual deploy.

I just played my first with manual and won handily on turn one because I went first. We both deployed all of our troops next to each other. If there was no fog, it would have been a more interesting game as I wouldn't have deployed next to my opponent without knowing who would go first.

Great addition though.
User avatar
Lieutenant Queen_Herpes
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Right Here. Look into my eyes.

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby 72o on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:14 am

-Maximus- wrote:
-Maximus- wrote:Whats wrong with sequential placement and no fog. Yes takes more rounds to even start the game, but would be the real "initial troop placement"
Could even make each map have a specific round limit to get all the troops deployed by forcing X amount of troops be placed per round.



Not a single comment on this? No one else would rather have sequential troop placement with no fog? Maybe I should have not put the "X" in my text...possibly confused everyone.


I agree with this. That's what I would prefer. My suggestion for the deployment previously was to make it sequential placement to decide ownership of the territories, and then either open it up for freestyle deployment, or sequential deployment of multiple troops per round like your idea above.
Image
Sergeant 72o
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:04 am

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Bruceswar on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:19 am

lackattack wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:I'm not sure if that fixes anything though, if you don't know where each player holds a territory. Perhaps it might be worthwhile to investigate the idea of keeping the "fog" during the deployment round, but instead of gray question marks use colored question marks so that while you cannot see how many troops have been deployed on that territory you can see where the other players have things.


It already uses coloured questionmarks to show who has which regions :?

Nephilim wrote:dude, lack.....what kind of convoluted reasoning is that? isn't the point of this option to make CC more like the real game?

and who the hell plays the real game with some sort of weird fog option? no one, that's who.

why don't you just give us the option to play it how we want, rather than force this wacky fog thing on us? i won't be playing it


You have to take into account that this is a casual web game designed for people to play without being online at the same time. Say you take turns placing 3 troops when you play the Risk board game... that would take 14 days to accomplish if done sequentially on the Classic map (and we have much bigger maps than that). I don't think that people want to wait 2 weeks to begin a game! And so what if the Risk board game doesn't offer Fog of War? I think most people would consider having that option a big plus. Saying "this sucks" doesn't help anyone but I'm open to any suggestions that make sense with our casual web game model.



I fully agree about 2 weeks, but the fog has to go if you ask me. I would at least like to know where his men will be so I do not waste my own men. Example A 6 man escalating game. You are dropped 2 spots in Aussie and some random low rank is dropped 1 spot. Since you only start with 6 total spots you wish to save those in Aussie. The random noob thinks great I will put all my men in Aussie and take the bonus! Woohoo! Now you have wasted 7 men in Aussie and are down. If we also knew who started the game we could better place our men.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Rassilon6 on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:21 am

lackattack wrote:If you have Fog of War on, it will just add the full fog on top of the initial troops "blindness" of enemy army counts. To have no blindness at all would cause problems because one player's deployment would affect the next player's decision and the order of deployment would then have too much impact.


Well, in the original game [Ok, someone has already said that this isn't meant to be exactly like the original, but at least consider...], deployment is sequential, so one player's deployment is supposed to affect the next player's decision. If we really wanted it like the original, deployment would be sequential, and there would be no fog. However, that would only work properly if we were restricted to deploying one at a time, and that would take forever!

What about dividing deployment into 3 or 4 or 5 sequential rounds (no fog)? It wouldn't take as long, and we could still build using information about others' deployments.

To be honest, I don't even think that's a very good suggestion! But I'll throw it out there for brainstorming; maybe this will trigger a better idea in someone else.

But while I may not hold use the Manual option very much myself, I wouldnt' suggest getting rid of it by any means. Everyone knows the rules of the particular game they are joining; if some choose to play by that rule, then it's good for them. And maybe a few days of playing it isn't enough to stumble upon a better strategy for it; keep exploring and trying out the Manual.

....and tell me how it goes, because I'll probably try it once and quit. :)
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Rassilon6
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: TN (Eastern Time Zone)

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby lackattack on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:23 am

Queen_Herpes wrote:default on start game menu should be automatic. Manual deploy takes additional time.


Automatic is already default.

Queen_Herpes wrote:There shouldn't be fog on the manual deploy, or there should be an option to fog on or off on manual deploy.


I think showing the army counts in a freestyle initial deployment round would cause more problems than it would solve.
User avatar
Sergeant lackattack
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby luapie on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:28 am

FFS LAGATTACK DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE SPEED OF THE SERVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class luapie
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:07 pm

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby luapie on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:32 am

Always a new tool, but upgrading the server.... no it will cost me to much bucks and i wannah have money money money. I paid for a product which has been changed, so i'll get my money back??
    Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class luapie
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:07 pm

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby lackattack on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:45 am

luapie wrote:Always a new tool, but upgrading the server.... no it will cost me to much bucks and i wannah have money money money. I paid for a product which has been changed, so i'll get my money back??


I monitor processing times and they look rather good. It sounds like there could be a problem on your end, and this is not the place to discuss that. Please submit a support ticket or ask around in the forum for advice.
User avatar
Sergeant lackattack
 
Posts: 6096
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Kotaro on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:50 am

I didn't know how to express my feelings quite when I first saw this, but I've figured it out.

Boo. If there's ever a medal for it, I'll play it, but otherwise, Boo.
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.

Image

TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
User avatar
Captain Kotaro
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: TheJonah: You`re a fucking ruthless, little cunt!

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby AndrewB on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:53 am

lackattack wrote:Manual - players decide where to place their armies in a blind freestyle round


I smell so much more farming!
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant AndrewB
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada, MST

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby PLAYER57832 on Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:54 am

Seems like Conquest maps might need a tweak?
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby slowreactor on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:09 am

wow... so much negativity for this...

again, the initial round should match the game, seq for seq, fs for fs, and all double-turn rules apply.
Also, the heavy fog should really be lifted. For fog games, regular fog rules should apply for fog games, and it should be clear for sunny games.
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Theoharis on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:14 am

Well, manual placement is certainly an interesting tweak, that with time and discussion will develop into something balanced. Now it just started, so it's bound to have some faults that will be discovered and dealt with in time.

-Maximus- wrote:Whats wrong with sequential placement and no fog. Yes takes more rounds to even start the game, but would be the real "initial troop placement" Could even make each map have a specific round limit to get all the troops deployed by forcing X amount of troops be placed per round.


I agree that this is perhaps the best way to go, but I can see it working only in speed games, otherwise it would take ages. With stacks of, say, 3 troops deployed each round. And definitely with no fog.
User avatar
Major Theoharis
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Tzar Reginald on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:29 am

Rassilon6 wrote:
Well, in the original game [Ok, someone has already said that this isn't meant to be exactly like the original, but at least consider...], deployment is sequential, so one player's deployment is supposed to affect the next player's decision. If we really wanted it like the original, deployment would be sequential, and there would be no fog. However, that would only work properly if we were restricted to deploying one at a time, and that would take forever!



Congrats Rassie!!! Excellent observation and avatar - I love Doctor Who.

Might a move toward sequential territory selection (ie. not by cards, otherwise known as random fixation to territories) before sequential deployment be the next lunge for the insatiable drive of CC?!?!

CC has come a long way from its beginnings of mimicing the board game RISK. No offense Optimus, but when one of the original maps was "Classic" and it exactly resembled the RISK board down to borders and territory names, yea, its original attempt was to be an online version of RISK. However, it has evolved into its present form based around the concept of RISK; it has adapted to the expanse and constraint of online communities, both continuously active and the day-to-day wayfarer.

I herald what was said before -play it if you like, if not, let others enjoy their twisted world.

Be the best CC you can be.

-Reginald Out
User avatar
Sergeant Tzar Reginald
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:35 pm

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby reptile on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:35 am

not a fan of this ideah
User avatar
Major reptile
 
Posts: 2988
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:34 am
Location: Highest Score: 3191 Highest Rank: 26th

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby karelpietertje on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:39 am

the double turn loop should be fixed for this as well imo...
Image
User avatar
Major karelpietertje
 
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:43 pm

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby bedub1 on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:40 am

Most excellent. I shall have to go start a game and become the first player to win a game with this style.
Colonel bedub1
 
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby SuicidalSnowman on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:41 am

I hate to be this way, but I don't see why there is so much negativity to this. Yes, there will always be games that don't work with some settings, or games that are more "farmable" or settings that are unfair.

The answer is, however, don't play those settings.

Personally, I do not like Freestyle because I cannot monitor my games enough to make it work for me. So I only play Sequential. I find plenty of good games to play. I know some people play almost exclusively Freestyle. They enjoy that type of game.

Some people only play speed. I personally like to ponder my moves for more than five minutes. (Seriously.) So I play Casual.

HOWEVER, I think it is awesome that if I have 30 minutes and want to get a game started and finished, I CAN play Speed. The option is there. Its not my favorite, and for the most part I don't play it, but I can if I want to.

Same with Freestyle. I know I will probably lose, but if I want to try it, I CAN play it.

Why would anyone complain about more options?

Sure, Farmers may be able to use this to get points. But 1) Nothing is stopping you from doing the same thing and 2) If a game type is found to be supportive of farmers, in my experience with CC, it falls out of favor with tournaments and clan games. Even though some of the guys on the top of the scoreboard play hundreds of City Mogul games, how many tournaments use it?

More options is great. And the general player use will dictate which types are used and how often, and in what regard they are held.

I am disappointed as well that this isn't the update that will revolutionize how we play games, but at the same time, I can't be angry about getting more choices. Just my two cents.

Cheers,
-Snowman
User avatar
Private SuicidalSnowman
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:40 am

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby ManBungalow on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:43 am

I love this already :P

I'm glad you chose to implement this before other updates, lack.
It makes such an improvement to freestyle games already.

More options can only be good.

I suggest that freestylers that they play the following settings :
1 vs 1
Freestyle
Manual deploy
Fog of war



ManB
Image
Colonel ManBungalow
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:02 am
Location: On a giant rock orbiting a star somewhere

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby whitestazn88 on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:49 am

nice update
Lieutenant whitestazn88
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: behind you

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby MudPuppy on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:54 am

I'd like to see:
  • No fog during placement phase (for sunny games);
  • Knowledge of play order before troop placement begins (this option not critical);
  • Manual placement of troops done in a series of rounds;
  • Number of troops placed per round as an option (1,2,3...all);
  • Freestyle order of placement within placement rounds to keep things moving.
The number of placement rounds would depend on size of map, number of players, and number of troops placed per round but unless the troops placed per round is high, there would be minimal incentive for players to wait to see where others place their troops within each freestyle placement round... thus speeding things along... in theory.

I think this would be a nice compromise for achieving sequential-like fogless placement while trying to keep things moving. The option of choosing number of troops placed per round would provide players a choice for balancing placement speed and placement equitability based on their preferences.
Last edited by MudPuppy on Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
Colonel MudPuppy
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
2

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Bruceswar on Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:55 am

SuicidalSnowman wrote:I hate to be this way, but I don't see why there is so much negativity to this. Yes, there will always be games that don't work with some settings, or games that are more "farmable" or settings that are unfair.

The answer is, however, don't play those settings.

Personally, I do not like Freestyle because I cannot monitor my games enough to make it work for me. So I only play Sequential. I find plenty of good games to play. I know some people play almost exclusively Freestyle. They enjoy that type of game.

Some people only play speed. I personally like to ponder my moves for more than five minutes. (Seriously.) So I play Casual.

HOWEVER, I think it is awesome that if I have 30 minutes and want to get a game started and finished, I CAN play Speed. The option is there. Its not my favorite, and for the most part I don't play it, but I can if I want to.

Same with Freestyle. I know I will probably lose, but if I want to try it, I CAN play it.

Why would anyone complain about more options?

Sure, Farmers may be able to use this to get points. But 1) Nothing is stopping you from doing the same thing and 2) If a game type is found to be supportive of farmers, in my experience with CC, it falls out of favor with tournaments and clan games. Even though some of the guys on the top of the scoreboard play hundreds of City Mogul games, how many tournaments use it?

More options is great. And the general player use will dictate which types are used and how often, and in what regard they are held.

I am disappointed as well that this isn't the update that will revolutionize how we play games, but at the same time, I can't be angry about getting more choices. Just my two cents.

Cheers,
-Snowman


Yeah yeah... No seriously while this has great potential it needs some major teaking. Nobody wants a blind freestyle round for this. If the game is fog then ok all is fair in love and war, but if not then no fog should be added. I do not mind the freestyle part as it speeds things up to a playable level. With a few fixes, such as letting people know who starts the game, and taking away the fog it would be tons better.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Lucky6 on Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:06 pm

so is this like, whoever finishes deployin first gets to take the turn first?
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Lucky6
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:26 am
Location: StL

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby -Maximus- on Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:10 pm

We already have games that take months....whats the big deal if a game takes 2 weeks to start. :roll:
If you wrong me I will hunt you down and destroy you.
User avatar
Major -Maximus-
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:59 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Manual Initial Troop Placement

Postby Rocketry on Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:21 pm

Best update since speed games, lack. Ace.

Rocket.
User avatar
Lieutenant Rocketry
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: Westminster

PreviousNext

Return to Announcement Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users