Page 1 of 2

Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:42 pm
by Nobunaga
... The vulgarity of liberals with regard to female conservatives is striking. I ran across this bit and was taken a bit aback, amazed that women nationwide weren't outraged. Perhaps they were outraged but that anger didn't get any coverage?

... Then I stopped and thought, hold on! These guys are dead on target. I mean, who the hell do these chicks think they are? F*cking bunch of neo-fascist c*nts is what they are, right? Am I right? Making me pies and giving me pleasure is their job, their only job that I care about. We gotta shut these b*tches up, seriously.

... Some highlights:

Playboy magazine writer Guy Cimbalo released his list of top ten conservative women against whom he’d like to commit violent sexual acts last June. Calling these acts a “hate f*ck” in his “So Right It’s Wrong” article, Cimbalo explained that he “might despise everything” about women like Michelle Malkin, Fox News’s Megyn Kelly, “The View’s” Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Mary Katherine Ham and Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann, “but goddammit, they’re hot!”

Cimbalo listed the physical attributes of each woman along with short explanations of why a self-respecting liberal male shouldn’t be attracted to them. A “hate-fuck rating,” presumably to tell others just how good the sex would be, accompanied each listing as well.

... You tell em' Guy!

From Rolling Stone Magazine, on Michelle Malkin:

“This move of hers to spearhead the teabag movement really adds an element to her writing that wasn’t there before,” he wrote. “Now when I read her stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy, set of balls in her mouth. It vastly improves her prose.”
... Lovely image, isn't it? Those hairy balls might shut her up for a while, eh?

From MSNBC's Olberman, Malkin again:

“She received death threats and hate-filled voicemails all thanks to the total mindless, morally bankrupt, knee-jerk fascistic hatred, without which Michelle Malkin would just be a big mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it,”
... Classic. A bag of meat, for a little Asian stirfry!

From ABC's Nightline, running a story on Barbie (the dolls)

“[Barbie's] been an astronaut and a rock star. Pop icons Beyonce and Shakira. She's won 'American Idol' too,” he began. “Some would argue she also ran for vice-president in 2008,” quipped Wright, after showing various clips of Palin.
... Gotta' love it.

There's more here, if interested:

http://www.cultureandmediainstitute.org ... 80134.aspx



(also, my rants vs women here and callng them c*nts, etc.. is sarcasm, in case you're new here)

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:46 pm
by Phatscotty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXKuDYvM6Wk

bullying women

you know the reporter scoped her shirt out in advance, and then pretended to bump into her as she chose who to interview. Can't get much more of a pre-meditated ambush and have the 14 year old still come out on top.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:55 pm
by Army of GOD
Hahahahaha, that was hilarious. I love those videos, whether they're stupid liberals or stupid conservatives.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:00 pm
by Neoteny
Image

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:17 pm
by thegreekdog
At least you guys are not hypocrits.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:05 pm
by BigBallinStalin
Colleen Raezler, the author, doesn't care that they're making fun of women because they're women. She only cares because they're making fun of conservative women. While working under the guise as a woman fighting for the goals of feminism, she promotes her own opinions, which run counter to feminism (equal rights for all kind of gets in her way). Raezler is a staunchly traditional, slightly anti-gay, extremely Christian, conservative right-wing mouthpiece for the Culture and Media Insitute. With one fell swoop, she makes all Christians, feminists, and conservatives look bad.

What is the Culture and Media Institute?

The Culture and Media Institute is an American non-profit organization focusing on promoting what it believes to be traditional values in American culture and beliefs and fair treatment of conservatives in the news media. It was founded in October 2006 as a division of the Media Research Center, a group that monitors perceived liberal news media bias.[1]

CMI promotes its mission through editorials and research reports. "Eye on Culture" is a regular feature in which CMI writers express their opinions on the state of American popular culture.[2] Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and opposition to same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in July 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude,[6] even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[7]

The CBS crime drama Cold Case has been twice criticized by the CMI for alleged anti-Christian prejudice in two episodes.[8] In May 2008, CMI released another report, one that claimed a moral decline in "Dear Abby" columns.[9]


What a bunch of cry babies.



More entertaining articles can be found at that institute by her:
Conservatives, Christians the Real ‘Victims’ of NBC’s Liberal ‘Law & Order: SVU’ (OH MAN, WHO SAW THAT ONE COMING??? Colleen Raezler DID! She's here to protect us!!!)

Colleen Raezler -- March 12, 2010. Calvin Klein 'X' Ad Aims for X-Rated Theme (SAVE THE KIDS, COLLEEN. Shelter those poor children from the evils of the world as you see fit!!)

Fall TV Season: A Little Good, A Lot of Bad and Ugly
Family values, Hollywood style; dirty jokes and the gay agenda anchor the 2009 television season.
By Colleen Raezler (Can't fool her, she knows bad when she sees it).

[Hope you enjoyed my spin on things. Had I taken the time, I could've shown irrefutable proof that she's anti-gay, and all of the above, but I don't care enough to spend 20+ minutes on such a thing. It's obvious of what she is and what she stands her. She can kindly and quietly go f*ck her self.]

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:14 pm
by thegreekdog
Hmm... I think you missed the point BBS (perhaps purposefully).

To reiterate the point:

Liberal columnist - "Conservative woman is a cunt and I would like to hate f*ck her."

No reaction.

Conservative columnist - "Liberal woman is a cunt and I would like to hate f*ck her."

Conservative columnist is fired from his job and later prosecuted for hate crimes.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:26 pm
by Titanic
thegreekdog wrote:Hmm... I think you missed the point BBS (perhaps purposefully).

To reiterate the point:

Liberal columnist - "Conservative woman is a cunt and I would like to hate f*ck her."

No reaction.

Conservative columnist - "Liberal woman is a cunt and I would like to hate f*ck her."

Conservative columnist is fired from his job and later prosecuted for hate crimes.


The law is supposed to be unbiased, sue the liberal columnist if what he did was illegal. If not then the conservative one clearly overstepped the mark.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:43 pm
by Symmetry
In the News Today:

Playboy is Misogynistic

Keep up the good work guys. And, after this, I don't think I'll ever treat Rolling Stone as a serious news source again.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:51 pm
by khazalid
The Daily Forum

bear snapped in woods-shitting scandal

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:16 pm
by thegreekdog
The Daily Forum

Strawman feels threatened by constant attacks.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:30 pm
by khazalid
well, think about it for more than a nanosecond.

i'm willing to bet the conservative who said those things about the liberal didn't do it in playboy magazine.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:32 pm
by thegreekdog
khazalid wrote:well, think about it for more than a nanosecond.

i'm willing to bet the conservative who said those things about the liberal didn't do it in playboy magazine.


Okay... how is that relevant?

If the conservative who said those things said it in KKK Monthly would there not be an outcry?

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:54 pm
by BigBallinStalin
thegreekdog wrote:Hmm... I think you missed the point BBS (perhaps purposefully).

To reiterate the point:

Liberal columnist - "Conservative woman is a cunt and I would like to hate f*ck her."

No reaction.

Conservative columnist - "Liberal woman is a cunt and I would like to hate f*ck her."

Conservative columnist is fired from his job and later prosecuted for hate crimes.



Playboy magazine writer Guy Cimbalo wrote a mean article. So what? Although it's raunchy, it's a sex mag whose writer has an agenda against conservative women who are ugly and who he'd like to "hate f*ck." That still isn't criminal; he hasn't committed anything illegal. And I'll go into what he actually wrote and what it means to hate f*ck very soon.

What helps him is that he isn't writing for some outlet for the official views of liberal or conservative politics, it's just a porno mag, so in terms of firing "liberal" or "conservative" columnists a porno magazine company is going to deal with their writers differently. Had he been a liberal columnist for something like MSNBC, or any liberal organization or company with a liberal agenda in the political scene hitting TVs everywhere, then it would've been a different outcome.

No reaction? Yeah, there was, but let's go on to a more specific question:

How about a legal reaction?

If there's enough evidence of a hate-crime, there should have been a lawsuit against him (but I couldn't find one). Why? Because, as you say, he's a liberal columnist? No, because it wasn't even a hate crime to begin with. It's isn't criminal to write such opinions in a magazine. I don't have the files on any lawsuit brought against him, but I can imagine the judge throwing it down with the ruling of "ridiculous." But, hey, maybe freedom of speech shouldn't be upheld so much, huh? (....).

As far as a conservative writer for a conservative magazine similar to Playboy writing something like this and getting fired and getting sentenced with a hate crime, please give me an example. If he was working for the mass media in politics, it's a different story, but please post that too if you run into anything.

Regardless of one's political or apolitical liberal/conservative lifestyle, if one commits a hate crime, then they'll be charged for it (as should happen, but there are of course exceptions as we all know). For one to suggest he got away scot-free from the legal system merely because he's liberal, is absurd. To label what he wrote as a hate crime is also absurd.

What we're missing are the details on that lawsuit(s) with the charge of a hate-crime that was brought up against him and was turned down. But since we don't, let's go into those details that would have more to do with what he actually wrote and his actions or lack there of--not those details of his political stance, which are obvious but aren't illegal.


With the help of the FBI, we'll define hate crime:

A hate crime, also known as a bias crime, is a criminal offense committed against a person, property, or society that is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_04/offenses ... index.html

For a change, let's actually looked at what the playboy man wrote:

http://blogwonks.com/2009/06/05/playboys-conservative-women-hate-fuck-fantasy/

Obama promised us the dream of post-partisanship—a cuckoo land where party affiliation and factional animosity were forgotten. Turn on cable news or open any newspaper, however, and you’ll quickly discover that the dream has yet to materialize. But there is a way to reach across the aisle without letting principles fall by the wayside. We speak, naturally, of the hate f*ck. We may despise everything these women represent, but goddammit they’re hot. Let the healing begin.


Writing this isn't illegal. Sorry, tgd, but it isn't. He hates what they represent (conservatives), which again isn't illegal. Is he inciting others to go and rape these women? No. He's done nothing illegal.

Go look at what he writes for each woman:

Michelle Malkin
He talks about her writing a book defending WWII's Japanese internment camps. (OH, no wonder the conservatives didn't take that well. And notice how Ms. Raezler didn't at all counter that claim)

The others, he just makes fun of. Something along the lines that conservatives have done to liberals within the mass media world. But he adds that he'd like to f*ck these women, but wouldn't because he can't stand them, which again is not illegal.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:55 pm
by khazalid
no?

and how exactly are context and setting not relevant?

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:06 pm
by thegreekdog
khazalid wrote:no?

and how exactly are context and setting not relevant?


I don't know, I happen to think there's nothing wrong with what any of those people said. I'm more confused about the hypocrisy.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:26 pm
by khazalid
thegreekdog wrote:
khazalid wrote:no?

and how exactly are context and setting not relevant?


I don't know, I happen to think there's nothing wrong with what any of those people said. I'm more confused about the hypocrisy.


well i'm not going to go mining the information, but the chances are that the conservative wound up losing his job because he was writing/reporting in a professional capacity, be it via media or politics. clearly not everyone has an equal amount of leeway as far as freedom of speech goes during the day job.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:35 pm
by PLAYER57832
It could also be the forum. Play boy does not exactly have the same literary guidelines as, say, Reader's Digest. Where you say something does matter.

At any rate, all the comments were rude. But I gotta agree with Big Stallin that while a lot of liberals may like to take hints from George Carlin, they make no claim to do otherwise. When supposedly "righteous" and "upstanding" conservatives feel its "OK to make slurrs against liberals"... it is pretty hypocritical. Not the hypocrisy you were speaking of greekdog, but anyway..

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:53 pm
by Woodruff
Symmetry wrote:In the News Today:
Playboy is Misogynistic
Keep up the good work guys. And, after this, I don't think I'll ever treat Rolling Stone as a serious news source again.


Wait...what?

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:41 pm
by Nobunaga
PLAYER57832 wrote:It could also be the forum. Play boy does not exactly have the same literary guidelines as, say, Reader's Digest. Where you say something does matter.

At any rate, all the comments were rude. But I gotta agree with Big Stallin that while a lot of liberals may like to take hints from George Carlin, they make no claim to do otherwise. When supposedly "righteous" and "upstanding" conservatives feel its "OK to make slurrs against liberals"... it is pretty hypocritical. Not the hypocrisy you were speaking of greekdog, but anyway..


... I live a sheltered life. Somebody show me similar examples of cons trash-talking liberal women, with reference to hate-f*cks, bags of meat, or balls on the chin.

... Thanks.

...

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:45 pm
by PLAYER57832
Nobunaga wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:It could also be the forum. Play boy does not exactly have the same literary guidelines as, say, Reader's Digest. Where you say something does matter.

At any rate, all the comments were rude. But I gotta agree with Big Stallin that while a lot of liberals may like to take hints from George Carlin, they make no claim to do otherwise. When supposedly "righteous" and "upstanding" conservatives feel its "OK to make slurrs against liberals"... it is pretty hypocritical. Not the hypocrisy you were speaking of greekdog, but anyway..


... I live a sheltered life. Somebody show me similar examples of cons trash-talking liberal women, with reference to hate-f*cks, bags of meat, or balls on the chin.

... Thanks.

...

Those are another group.
They don't make the media, but walk through the streets of Berkeley sometime... The only thing I can say in their defense is that at least they don't pretend to be anything but what they are.

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:45 pm
by Army of GOD
Since when does anyone read articles in Playboy?

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:47 pm
by PLAYER57832
Army of GOD wrote:Since when does anyone read articles in Playboy?

In truth, we were assigned some xeroxed articles in high school. JUST the articles, mind you.. (on the JFK assassination, the interview with the president of the day, whom I decline to name).

Other than that... it's just not to my tastes (lol -- if you don't get why, check my profile -- lol)

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:56 pm
by army of nobunaga
what the f*ck.. there is another nobunaga?

Re: Conservative Women

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:57 pm
by nietzsche
Image