BigBallinStalin wrote:kentington wrote:I don't get the trap thing.
This seems kind of close to another bail out. If the industry needs advertising, then they should pay for it on their own without the government stepping in ( i.e. Let them add 12 cents to every tree). Also, if these companies don't have enough money for advertising, then it is probably a failing business. People buy fake trees because the cost of live trees keeps going up and gets ridiculous.
So why does this happen? What motivates the Agriculture Department and the legislators to implement this tax?
I'm not sure. Even the fact that this tax is talked about is free advertising. No publicity is bad publicity?
It just seems like the tax may hold them afloat this season, but in a future season this tax will be supporting and subsidizing. So, they may see that they wont last long enough without the taxes starting now. ( This is just speculation, because I really don't know.)