Page 1 of 4

The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:22 pm
by CreepersWiener
Where is Woodruff?

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:09 pm
by tkr4lf
I'm pretty sure he's being held captive by nazis. Shirtless, no less.

Image

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:08 pm
by Haggis_McMutton
I hear he's .... changed ....


Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:40 pm
by Quirk
road trip

Image

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:47 pm
by demonfork
Haggis_McMutton wrote:I hear he's .... changed ....



I wonder how many of those little honies he banged out after they finished recording.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:22 pm
by pimpdave
I'm sure he's off screaming at people and calling children "fucking retards" somewhere.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:08 pm
by CreepersWiener
pimpdave wrote:I'm sure he's off screaming at people and calling children "fucking retards" somewhere.


They are not the hell your whales!!!!


Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:28 pm
by shieldgenerator7


He probably left to get some emotion chips

*poke-poke

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:46 pm
by DangerBoy
pimpdave wrote:I'm sure he's off screaming at people and calling children "fucking retards" somewhere.


Probably the one thing we both agree on , dave. That guy was utterly worthless to discussions. He was just trying to get under peoples' skin.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:37 am
by tkr4lf
DangerBoy wrote:
pimpdave wrote:I'm sure he's off screaming at people and calling children "fucking retards" somewhere.


Probably the one thing we both agree on , dave. That guy was utterly worthless to discussions. He was just trying to get under peoples' skin.

When he's not suffering from a serious anger issue, he's actually a pretty decent poster. He makes good points and is generally a reasonable and rational person. I don't know, maybe he's bipolar or something, because he does fly off the handle quite often, but putting that aside, I don't mind him at all.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:59 am
by grifftron
so for real, why was he guested?

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:25 am
by tkr4lf
I think it had something to do with flaming one of barackattack's multis, calling him a worthless animal or something like that.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:46 am
by Aradhus
DangerBoy wrote: That guy was utterly worthless to discussions. He was just trying to get under peoples' skin.



You're must be joking? Wow, ironically Dangerboy describes himself almost perfectly.

Woodruff was banned because people like pimpdave bait him. Woodruff was banned because a multi, intentionally created to bait woodruff because woodruff had gotten the better of the multi creator in prior debates, baited him and he reacted to it.

Totally reasonable to uphold that ban. If you're an idiot.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:32 pm
by CreepersWiener
shieldgenerator7 wrote:

He probably left to get some emotion chips

*poke-poke


I remember this! This is when Woodruff was really horny and he thought he killed pimpdave in a death match.

Image

Click image to enlarge.
image



However, AoG came along and pumped pimpdave full of neuro-inhibitor so that pimpdave simulated death.

Image

That way Woodruff's grandmother (the High Queen of Ass Lifts) would believe that his son had succeeded in his mating ritual.

Image

Now that Woodruff's hormones have settled down from playing Mortal Combat, he can continue being friends with pimpdave, and AoG gets to plug the hot nurse with the beehive.

--The End--

Image

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:40 pm
by CreepersWiener
Aradhus wrote:
DangerBoy wrote: That guy was utterly worthless to discussions. He was just trying to get under peoples' skin.



You're must be joking? Wow, ironically Dangerboy describes himself almost perfectly.

Woodruff was banned because people like pimpdave bait him. Woodruff was banned because a multi, intentionally created to bait woodruff because woodruff had gotten the better of the multi creator in prior debates, baited him and he reacted to it.

Totally reasonable to uphold that ban. If you're an idiot.


Ugh...this is what happened to him!

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=166468

Image

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:40 pm
by Symmetry
CreepersWiener wrote:
Aradhus wrote:
DangerBoy wrote: That guy was utterly worthless to discussions. He was just trying to get under peoples' skin.



You're must be joking? Wow, ironically Dangerboy describes himself almost perfectly.

Woodruff was banned because people like pimpdave bait him. Woodruff was banned because a multi, intentionally created to bait woodruff because woodruff had gotten the better of the multi creator in prior debates, baited him and he reacted to it.

Totally reasonable to uphold that ban. If you're an idiot.


Ugh...this is what happened to him!

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=166468

Image


Indeed, as far as I can tell, a troll account was set up to intentionally annoy him, he got annoyed. The multi account got banned (big deal- the only purpose of the account was to annoy), and Woody got a ban too (pretty much justifying the purpose of the troll account).

Woody, not having the advantage of multiple accounts, what with being an honest bloke, is cut off. The multi troll claims his scalp, and gains satisfaction.

I don't think anyone who's been on these forums for any length of time would argue that Woodruff doesn't have a short temper, but he's also unfailingly honest.

If there's more to this than Woody railing against a troll, I'm open to a rethink.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:36 pm
by shieldgenerator7
poor woodruff. being targeted like that. I hope he returns soon

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:55 pm
by Dukasaur
Symmetry wrote:I don't think anyone who's been on these forums for any length of time would argue that Woodruff doesn't have a short temper, but he's also unfailingly honest.

+1

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:16 pm
by tkr4lf
Dukasaur wrote:
Symmetry wrote:I don't think anyone who's been on these forums for any length of time would argue that Woodruff doesn't have a short temper, but he's also unfailingly honest.

+1

+1

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:26 pm
by john9blue
Aradhus wrote:You're must be joking? Wow, ironically Dangerboy describes himself almost perfectly.

Woodruff was banned because people like pimpdave bait him. Woodruff was banned because a multi, intentionally created to bait woodruff because woodruff had gotten the better of the multi creator in prior debates, baited him and he reacted to it.

Totally reasonable to uphold that ban. If you're an idiot.


Symmetry wrote:
Indeed, as far as I can tell, a troll account was set up to intentionally annoy him, he got annoyed. The multi account got banned (big deal- the only purpose of the account was to annoy), and Woody got a ban too (pretty much justifying the purpose of the troll account).

Woody, not having the advantage of multiple accounts, what with being an honest bloke, is cut off. The multi troll claims his scalp, and gains satisfaction.

I don't think anyone who's been on these forums for any length of time would argue that Woodruff doesn't have a short temper, but he's also unfailingly honest.

If there's more to this than Woody railing against a troll, I'm open to a rethink.


these two posts sum it up almost flawlessly.

i tolerated woodruff for the same reason that i tolerate player. they may disagree with me frequently, but they are not trolls. nobody who is not a troll deserves to be banned.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:05 pm
by Symmetry
Maybe one of the mods will step in and explain the thinking behind this decision to reward trolling. All I saw on the C&A report was that he violated the forum guidelines, pretty much the vaguest explanation possible. For the mods involved in this travesty:

Image

This is a nipple, in violation of the community guidelines. I'm also posting this intentionally, and acknowledge that it may well be considered annoying- a violation of another community guideline.

Of course, I'm not looking for a ban, just a bit of common sense.

Community guidelines should protect the community, not reward trolling.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:31 pm
by Haggis_McMutton
Symmetry wrote:Of course, I'm not looking for a ban, just a bit of common sense.

Community guidelines should protect the community, not reward trolling.


I've been asking for that for a couple of years now.

Here's how the discussion usually goes:

Me: This decision doesn't make sense
Mod: It's correct according to the guidelines.
Me: Yes, but surely you see, it makes no sense.
Mod: No, it makes perfect sense *quotes guidelines*.
Me: Yes, but can't you see that this decision is against what the guidelines are trying to achieve, even if it respects them in letter
Mod: This inquiry has been satisfactorily handled as per the guidelines. Thread locked.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:57 pm
by pimpdave
I don't think you guys know what trolling actually is.

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:26 pm
by CreepersWiener
Symmetry wrote:Maybe one of the mods will step in and explain the thinking behind this decision to reward trolling. All I saw on the C&A report was that he violated the forum guidelines, pretty much the vaguest explanation possible. For the mods involved in this travesty:

Image

This is a nipple, in violation of the community guidelines. I'm also posting this intentionally, and acknowledge that it may well be considered annoying- a violation of another community guideline.

Of course, I'm not looking for a ban, just a bit of common sense.

Community guidelines should protect the community, not reward trolling.


What did the discussion entail? How do you bait someone that has a multi account? Shouldn't Woodruff be rewarded for baiting a multi? Come on...the mods have got to see the error in all this hoopla. For the mods to punish an honest member of CC and reward someone that has flagrantly abused CC rules seems to be a bit obtuse...don't you think?

Anyway, FREE WOODRUFF!


Image

Re: The Banishing of Woodruff?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:33 pm
by Quirk
pimpdave wrote:I don't think you guys know what trolling actually is.


When it's done right you never even know you were trolled.