Phatscotty wrote:I have posted tons of sources. We just finished talking about how all the sources have different information. I think that was on the last page....what is for sure is that Trayvon was much, much taller than Zimmerman. No matter how much the weight, it's pretty perverse to argue that the 5'11"-6'3" guy is the smaller person, compared to a 5'3"-5'7" person. If you are confused because of Woodruff's derailing, I understand.
Woodruff's derailing? Phatscotty, in a fight, the shorter, heavier guy is going to have a TREMENDOUS advantage over a taller, thinner guy unless he's an utter incompetent. Yet you want to pretend that the only thing that matters is height. Do you ever seriously consider that you might be a bigot?
Phatscotty wrote:Plus, there is the whole thing that Zimmerman did not land a single blow
Wait, what? You ARE a bigot, aren't you?
Phatscotty wrote:but received over a dozen blows and had numerous injuries. Care to take a wild guess who the bigger guy is? Just to pre-empt what I know your response will be, yes I admit that the bigger person does not always totally dominate a fight, I just hope that you can admit the bigger person almost always does win the fight, and should at least be able to land a single punch.
In a fight, the shorter, heavier guy is going to have a tremendous advantage unless he's an utter incompetent.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.