Conquer Club

New book suggests OJs kid may be real murderer.

The author has done some sensational stuff in the past, so Im not about to believe it just yet, if ever, however, the very notion that OJ could be proven innocent with so many having labeled him as guilty is disturbing.

Granted, covering for a murderer, albeit your son is hardly admirable, but its infinitely better than actually murdering someone, so I simply wonder how it will all pan out...or if.

Just imagine if OJ actually was innocent, the actual injustice done the man. It really could be a cautionary tale...or should be.

There's no statute of limitations on murder.

OJ is innocent?!?!



WOO HOO WE WON WE WON!

pimpdave wrote:There's no statute of limitations on murder.

No there isnt, however, evidence does very much degrade, and the state televising the most popular trial of the century trying to convince the world that they were positive that someone else was 100% guilty of a murder, is quite a bit of reasonable doubt.

Yeah, hey, speaking of which, what is the trial of the 20th century? I'd think it's more the Scopes Monkey Trial.

pimpdave wrote:Yeah, hey, speaking of which, what is the trial of the 20th century? I'd think it's more the Scopes Monkey Trial.

Nuremberg?

AAFitz wrote:No there isnt, however, evidence does very much degrade, and the state televising the most popular trial of the century trying to convince the world that they were positive that someone else was 100% guilty of a murder, is quite a bit of reasonable doubt.

Reasonable doubt.... Beautiful words.

Scott Peterson is still on death row without any proof that he committed the crime.

It's perfectly okay to call him a murderer because he was convicted, but is he? We all know the American justice system is all about convincing a jury, not about the facts. Same goes for OJ. You got proof? Fine, convict him. You don't, still innocent until proven guilty, at least to the rest of the world.

Reasonable doubt.... Beautiful words.

Lx