Conquer Club

Following North Carolina's banning of not only gay marriage, but civil unions for gay folk, where do posters stand?

-rd

Gays should absolutely have equal rights, there should be no question about this but I think that there needs to be some form of public resistance against the gay community. If you take all of the taboo out of being gay then it won't be as hot when I beat off to gay porn.

It's like the joke by America's Funny Man Neil Hamburger....."Why did God make homosexuality a sin?.... Because it made his boyfriend horny"

demonfork wrote:Gays should absolutely have equal rights, there should be no question about this but I think that there needs to be some form of public resistance against the gay community. If you take all of the taboo out of being gay then it won't be as hot when I beat off to gay porn.

It's like the joke by America's Funny Man Neil Hamburger....."Why did God make homosexuality a sin?.... Because it made his boyfriend horny"

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you think there isn't public resistance against the gay community?

What are you proposing?

Gay Rights activists are looking to get a ballot measure in main put on the next ballot I recall from some time ago (which is one of the first measures that activists rather than opponents, are seeking voter referendum). The country will most likely continue to shift towards accepting more and more Gay Rights, just as the country shifted on Women's and Civil Rights.


--Andy

Symmetry wrote:

demonfork wrote:Gays should absolutely have equal rights, there should be no question about this but I think that there needs to always should be some form of public resistance against the gay community. If you take all of the taboo out of being gay then it won't be as hot when I beat off to gay porn.

It's like the joke by America's Funny Man Neil Hamburger....."Why did God make homosexuality a sin?.... Because it made his boyfriend horny"

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you think there isn't public resistance against the gay community?

What are you proposing?

fixed

i spent a good while trying to work out what needed fixing in my post, only to realise you were talking to yourself.

another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

This is the internetz, there is no credibility.


--Andy

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

i have manipulated George Lucas into creating a series of awful awful films, which even fans of the series dislike on the whole.

But seriously dude, you never had any credibility to attack.

AndyDufresne wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

This is the internetz, there is no credibility.


--Andy

andy... thats not true. you have serious web-street cred.

Symmetry wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

i have manipulated George Lucas into creating a series of awful awful films, which even fans of the series dislike on the whole.

But seriously dude, you never had any credibility to attack.

again with the hateful comments... for someone with such care-free political views, im shocked! Did something happen to you as a child to make you so angry? as an adult, perhaps? perhaps there is ongoing trauma? do you need to talk about it? in any case, instead of bashing me and my beliefs and interests, bash a therapist's couch. or something else. just not me.

and for the record, Star Wars is one of the most popular sagas of all time, and it is not that fans do not like the movies, it is just that one trilogy is chuck norris-like, and one is merely awesome, and there is much debate about which is which.

vodean wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

This is the internetz, there is no credibility.


--Andy

andy... thats not true. you have serious web-street cred.

Symmetry wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

i have manipulated George Lucas into creating a series of awful awful films, which even fans of the series dislike on the whole.

But seriously dude, you never had any credibility to attack.

again with the hateful comments... for someone with such care-free political views, im shocked! Did something happen to you as a child to make you so angry? as an adult, perhaps? perhaps there is ongoing trauma? do you need to talk about it? in any case, instead of bashing me and my beliefs and interests, bash a therapist's couch. or something else. just not me.

and for the record, Star Wars is one of the most popular sagas of all time, and it is not that fans do not like the movies, it is just that one trilogy is chuck norris-like, and one is merely awesome, and there is much debate about which is which.

Hateful how?

Anyway, getting back on thread....

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

I look forward to see how vodeon tries to stand by his statement that this is a misleading thread title.

Symmetry wrote:Following North Carolina's banning of not only gay marriage, but civil unions for gay folk, where do posters stand?

for Democracy

In b4 "so, you are saying....."

Bones2484 wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

I look forward to see how vodeon tries to stand by his statement that this is a misleading thread title.

You can look forward to marriage being defined as between one man and one woman.

Bones2484 wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

I look forward to see how vodeon tries to stand by his statement that this is a misleading thread title.

Meh, he's not backed up any of his his illiterate statements so far. I hope he realises that I relish a good argument.

"Not Allowed" admittedly doesn't mean quite the same thing as "punished for not being heterosexual," but it's the South, they're too polite to tell them to leave outright.

Bones2484 wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

I look forward to see how vodeon tries to stand by his statement that this is a misleading thread title.

Because the thread title states that gays aren't allowed in North Carolina, which is in no way related to what was actually passed by the state.


And of course, the poll question is also completely misleading because homosexuals DO have the exact same rights as every other person. Marriage isn't a right, so defining it certain ways cannot possibly be a violation of rights.

I can understand why North Carolina needed to double down on the anti-gay marriage thing, it is only a matter of time before bans like this are swept away like other civil rights injustices of the past. The younger the age group is, the more overwhelmingly in favor of gay marriage that they are. Eventually this will just be another page in the history books. People will look back at this the same way they look at slavery. They'll shake their heads and wonder why something that seems so obvious to them was so controversial for us.

By the way, I'm still waiting on hearing what the difference between those opposed to interracial marriage and those opposed to gay marriage is. Keep in mind that interracial marriage was illegal in many parts of the country until 1967, and that even though those opposed to it have to be silent on it to avoid revealing what a fucking bigot they are that there are still people out there that oppose it.

Well, Frigidus, it's like this: if you mix a mule and donkey, you get squid worms. And you don't want squid worms, do ya?

BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, Frigidus, it's like this: if you mix a mule and donkey, you get squid worms. And you don't want squid worms, do ya?

People that don't like squid worms are bigots.

Night Strike wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

I look forward to see how vodeon tries to stand by his statement that this is a misleading thread title.

Because the thread title states that gays aren't allowed in North Carolina, which is in no way related to what was actually passed by the state.


And of course, the poll question is also completely misleading because homosexuals DO have the exact same rights as every other person. Marriage isn't a right, so defining it certain ways cannot possibly be a violation of rights.

Voting wasnt a right for women either. Until it was.

AAFitz wrote:

Night Strike wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:

vodean wrote:another completely misleading title by sym, further lowering his credibility. It also provides evidence for how liberals love to create total BS to manipulate the average person.

I look forward to see how sym tries to attack my credibility in his reply

I look forward to see how vodeon tries to stand by his statement that this is a misleading thread title.

Because the thread title states that gays aren't allowed in North Carolina, which is in no way related to what was actually passed by the state.


And of course, the poll question is also completely misleading because homosexuals DO have the exact same rights as every other person. Marriage isn't a right, so defining it certain ways cannot possibly be a violation of rights.

Voting wasnt a right for women either. Until it was.

Considering marriage isn't a right for any person, your analogy is invalid.

Frigidus wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, Frigidus, it's like this: if you mix a mule and donkey, you get squid worms. And you don't want squid worms, do ya?

People that don't like squid worms are bigots.

Yeah, but they're against the Sacred Text of the FSM, and as we all know, the Sacred Text of the FSM is infallible, so boo ya.