Of all the books that were required reading when I was in school, the Great Gatsby was the only one I never finished. I was always a compulsive reader, so to not finish a book was pretty rare for me.
In fairness, though, my not finishing the book probably had more to do with the massive river of alcohol that I was being subjected to that year than with any negative qualities of the book, so I've gone middle-of-the-road and rated it "Ok" since I honestly don't remember anything about it.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:22 pm
by Army of GOD
Great. Loved it.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:24 pm
by Army of GOD
Although I'm not sure about how good the film adaptation is going to be because Fitzgerald's amazing writing-style will be lost.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:28 pm
by Crazyirishman
Army of GOD wrote:Although I'm not sure about how good the film adaptation is going to be because Fitzgerald's amazing writing-style will be lost.
I thought they already made a movie about it? I personally felt the book was a good read
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:29 pm
by Army of GOD
Crazyirishman wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:Although I'm not sure about how good the film adaptation is going to be because Fitzgerald's amazing writing-style will be lost.
I thought they already made a movie about it? I personally felt the book was a good read
yea, forgot about that. I never watched it though.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:34 pm
by Symmetry
My vote is the ok. Great writing, really great writing. Plot was kind of boring, and characters were kinda forgettable.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:54 pm
by Army of GOD
Symmetry wrote:My vote is the ok. Great writing, really great writing. Plot was kind of boring, and characters were kinda forgettable.
I thought the plot and theme weren't as powerful as my other favorites (Clockwork Orange, Brave New World, The Stranger), but I thought it was still pretty strong. Probably would've meant more if we read it soon after it came out.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:57 pm
by nietzsche
More than in the plot, the great of the book is in its prose style.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:20 am
by whitestazn88
robert redford as gatsby in the first time they made that book into a movie: hotness, no homo (is that a flame?)
book, i've read it 3 times, all for school (which is dumb). it's pretty good. i like the premise of the story, and the writing is indeed of high quality, but some of the characters really make you scratch your head
the upcoming movie, i think, will be more impressive than the first. it's gonna be amazin'
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:38 am
by saxitoxin
Definitely one of the better story arcs in Entourage. Not sure how well they'll do spinning it off into a film, but then again, look at Cheers and Frasier.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:17 pm
by huamulan
'characters were kinda forgettable'
I think that was kind of the point. People like the Buchanans are (to the outsider) living the consumerist dream but it's all just a facade. The people are still bland and unoriginal underneath it all (in the same way as Gatsby's persona is all just an illusion).
I love the book.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:28 am
by thegreekdog
I read it in high school and did not like it.
That being said, I suspect there are novels I read in middle school and high school that I should read again with a new (older) perspective.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:00 pm
by Symmetry
huamulan wrote:'characters were kinda forgettable'
I think that was kind of the point. People like the Buchanans are (to the outsider) living the consumerist dream but it's all just a facade. The people are still bland and unoriginal underneath it all (in the same way as Gatsby's persona is all just an illusion).
I love the book.
I'd agree with that- it's a book that owes a lot to symbolism, and I think that's the way most people read it. The characters are more symbols or representatives of ideas. I can see that that's what the book is doing, and it does it pretty well, but acknowledging that doesn't really mean that I like the way its done.
That's why I love the prose so much.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:10 pm
by rdsrds2120
Urrghghguuhg. That's about the only book I couldn't stand reading in High School. I'm not sure what it was, but making myself read it for class was just an uphill battle at every page turn.
edit: Actually, I think it was the writing and the time that the novel took place. I'm really not a fan of the early 1900's in America.
-rd
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:21 pm
by nagerous
Symmetry wrote:The Great Gatsby? Kind of an arrogant title.
One of my favourite books of all time. I saw the movie trailer the other day though and wasn't sure what to think, didn't really fit to the theme with the Kanye/Jay-Z soundtrack that was apparently being employed.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:26 pm
by Nola_Lifer
It is suppose to be an arrogant title for the book. Roaring 20's, bootleggers party, inherited money. Lots of symbols alluding to money.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:32 pm
by Timminz
I'd rate it a solid 'good'.
Re: Gatsby ratings
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:05 pm
by huamulan
Isn't 'great' just how other people see Gatsby (including the protagonist, when he first meets him)?