Conquer Club

What would humans of the 11th century think of computers, space shuttles, submarines, or the european union? They would think the very idea of such a thing to be preposterous, sprung from the mind of a madman without connection to reality. (or something along those lines) Yet it is the reality of our time. What do you imagine the future might hold that we today think of as impossible, delusional or unlikely?

eugenics.

The point is it would have been pretty much impossible for people 3 centuries ago to conceive of the things we have today, so it's probably equally impossble for us to conceive of what'll be in 3 centuries.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:The point is it would have been pretty much impossible for people 3 centuries ago to conceive of the things we have today, so it's probably equally impossble for us to conceive of what'll be in 3 centuries.

Okay, smartypants. What does the future hold for us in exactly 299 years from now?

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Haggis_McMutton wrote:The point is it would have been pretty much impossible for people 3 centuries ago to conceive of the things we have today, so it's probably equally impossble for us to conceive of what'll be in 3 centuries.

Okay, smartypants. What does the future hold for us in exactly 299 years from now?

nothin you'll be dead long before then

technology to punch gillipig over the internet

Army of GOD wrote:technology to punch gillipig over the internet

We could have THAT by the end of the decade.

Sniper08 wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Haggis_McMutton wrote:The point is it would have been pretty much impossible for people 3 centuries ago to conceive of the things we have today, so it's probably equally impossble for us to conceive of what'll be in 3 centuries.

Okay, smartypants. What does the future hold for us in exactly 299 years from now?

nothin you'll be dead long before then

AUBREY DE GREY AND HIS TEAM WILL ENABLE ME TO LIVE FOR 1000 YEARS.

299 years from now, I'll restore these servers to life, and reply, "HAHA! YOU'RE WRONG! I won the ultimate internet debate evarrr!!"

patches70 wrote:

That's not so bad if the boot is cushioned with foam. Or maybe in the future, this would be a sign of tremendous respect--more so than receiving a blow-job with no exchange of money involved!

BigBallinStalin wrote:That's not so bad if the boot is cushioned with foam. Or maybe in the future, this would be a sign of tremendous respect--more so than receiving a blow-job with no exchange of money involved!

............people do blow-jobs for free??

john9blue wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:That's not so bad if the boot is cushioned with foam. Or maybe in the future, this would be a sign of tremendous respect--more so than receiving a blow-job with no exchange of money involved!

............people do blow-jobs for free??

At least they don't always ask for money, which is pretty much the same thing.

MeDeFe wrote:

john9blue wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:That's not so bad if the boot is cushioned with foam. Or maybe in the future, this would be a sign of tremendous respect--more so than receiving a blow-job with no exchange of money involved!

............people do blow-jobs for free??

At least they don't always ask for money, which is pretty much the same thing.

As long as this doesn't happen.

Es gives free blowjobs just to piss of saxi.

Trust me on that.

inb4 saxi makes a small dick joke or something of the like

Army of GOD wrote:Es gives free blowjobs just to piss of saxi.

You must have been attending her small dick charity event.

Army of GOD wrote:inb4 saxi makes a small dick joke or something of the like

WOOOOOODRUUFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!

On a non-technological note, the US government, under the Odumbass administration, is going to sign a UN treaty that will violate the second amendment. a generation ago, this would have been unthinkable.

The Great Ronald Reagan wrote:Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Mr_Adams wrote:On a non-technological note, the US government, under the Odumbass administration, is going to sign a UN treaty that will violate the second amendment. a generation ago, this would have been unthinkable.

The Great Ronald Reagan wrote:Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Not all changes are bad though. If I were to say to my great great great grandfather that same sex marriages would be allowed in Sweden in the future he'd first) not believe me second) not think it would be a good thing. We're not really capable of assessing whether something is "good" or "bad". Maybe violations of the twentyseven amendments is good? Maybe they're ultimately just flawed and their disappearance ploughs the way for a better constitution?

Gillipig wrote:

Mr_Adams wrote:On a non-technological note, the US government, under the Odumbass administration, is going to sign a UN treaty that will violate the second amendment. a generation ago, this would have been unthinkable.

The Great Ronald Reagan wrote:Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Not all changes are bad though. If I were to say to my great great great grandfather that same sex marriages would be allowed in Sweden in the future he'd first) not believe me second) not think it would be a good thing. We're not really capable of assessing whether something is "good" or "bad". Maybe violations of the twentyseven amendments is good? Maybe they're ultimately just flawed and their disappearance ploughs the way for a better constitution?

just for the hell of it, I'm throwing some raw meat into the water for Scott; I'm not making an argument one way or the other, I just want to see some fireworks in this thread - show Saxi the fucking fireworks

The European Union is preposterous. Impossible trinity means you cannot have a fixed exchange rate, absence of capital controls, and an independent monetary policy. Durr when multiple countries are using the same exact currency there is no exchange rate and good luck keeping Euros from one EU country from going to another....

So the speculators control national economies by manipulating the bond market, and the governments have limited control to curb inflation since they don't control the printing of the currency and can't just refuse to lend banks the money....

Fucking euronoobs.

Gillipig wrote:

Mr_Adams wrote:On a non-technological note, the US government, under the Odumbass administration, is going to sign a UN treaty that will violate the second amendment. a generation ago, this would have been unthinkable.

The Great Ronald Reagan wrote:Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Not all changes are bad though. If I were to say to my great great great grandfather that same sex marriages would be allowed in Sweden in the future he'd first) not believe me second) not think it would be a good thing. We're not really capable of assessing whether something is "good" or "bad". Maybe violations of the twentyseven amendments is good? Maybe they're ultimately just flawed and their disappearance ploughs the way for a better constitution?

Right, yes, because an unarmed nation is a peaceful nation. That's what history teaches us, isn't it? Switzerland is just a bunch of crazy people with one of the lowest crime rates in the world. The fact that they have the highest gun-ownership rates in the world is a fluke.

No, the second amendment is absolutely necessary to civilized human life. "If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."- James Madison, Fed. 51. Anybody who believes that the freedom of speech, redress, trial, self defense, etc. ought to be given at the whim of the government is either incredibly naive, or a fascist who want to be part of said ruling body.

Dibbun wrote:The European Union is preposterous. Impossible trinity means you cannot have a fixed exchange rate, absence of capital controls, and an independent monetary policy. Durr when multiple countries are using the same exact currency there is no exchange rate and good luck keeping Euros from one EU country from going to another....

So the speculators control national economies by manipulating the bond market, and the governments have limited control to curb inflation since they don't control the printing of the currency and can't just refuse to lend banks the money....

Fucking euronoobs.

This.

saxitoxin wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Mr_Adams wrote:On a non-technological note, the US government, under the Odumbass administration, is going to sign a UN treaty that will violate the second amendment. a generation ago, this would have been unthinkable.

The Great Ronald Reagan wrote:Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Not all changes are bad though. If I were to say to my great great great grandfather that same sex marriages would be allowed in Sweden in the future he'd first) not believe me second) not think it would be a good thing. We're not really capable of assessing whether something is "good" or "bad". Maybe violations of the twentyseven amendments is good? Maybe they're ultimately just flawed and their disappearance ploughs the way for a better constitution?

just for the hell of it, I'm throwing some raw meat into the water for Scott; I'm not making an argument one way or the other, I just want to see some fireworks in this thread - show Saxi the fucking fireworks

One could pick whatever words he chose and try to run some sort of conclusion with it, but it wouldn't be relevant because a) even though they're translated, words do have a slightly different meaning in different langauages. b) countries apparently do not care all that much about what it says in their constitution (see the american constitutions seperation between religion and state, and passive attitude towards the rest of the world)

Dibbun wrote:The European Union is preposterous. Impossible trinity means you cannot have a fixed exchange rate, absence of capital controls, and an independent monetary policy. Durr when multiple countries are using the same exact currency there is no exchange rate and good luck keeping Euros from one EU country from going to another....

So the speculators control national economies by manipulating the bond market, and the governments have limited control to curb inflation since they don't control the printing of the currency and can't just refuse to lend banks the money....

Fucking euronoobs.

You're not talking about the European Union, you're talking about the Eurozone! Far from all countries in the European Union are part of the Eurozone. The Eurozone is obviously a fail. By definition really. But the European Union is as succesful of an organization as Eurozone is a fail. Since the European Union was founded, no large scale wars have been taking place in Europe.

yeaaaiih boy, here we go!

Gillipig wrote:(see the american constitutions seperation between religion and state, and passive attitude towards the rest of the world)

You mean two things that don't occur int he text? (Although they are two things I support, and prominent issues in the Federalist Papers/responses)