Page 1 of 6

Now a F*ckin' Space Science Thread

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:26 pm
by Maugena
Image
???

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:29 pm
by Army of GOD
f*ck ecards are awful. I hate them and every stupid idiot (redundant) that shares them on Facetbook. inb4 natty: "I DUN HAVE FACETBOOK"

Anyway, that's pretty lame. We've been on Mars before and to say religion as a whole was talking about chicken sandwiches is awe;oirjaewr

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:59 pm
by kentington
Army of GOD wrote:f*ck ecards are awful. I hate them and every stupid idiot (redundant) that shares them on Facetbook. inb4 natty: "I DUN HAVE FACETBOOK"


I approve this message.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:59 pm
by Maugena
Army of GOD wrote:f*ck ecards are awful. I hate them and every stupid idiot (redundant) that shares them on Facetbook. inb4 natty: "I DUN HAVE FACETBOOK"

Anyway, that's pretty lame. We've been on Mars before and to say religion as a whole was talking about chicken sandwiches is awe;oirjaewr

My ex shared this on Facebook and I was like... no... this is incorrect and some random was like, "blah blah blah, restating your point in some odd way and then says other shit" and I was like, "Okay... but it wasn't religion that was 'deciding what chicken was okay to eat... I was just stating that this is wrong." And the guy was like, "And I was just stating the error in your point."
My face on the keyboaoprijaspodijfpoasidjfpoasijdfpoasijdfpouhigraeoijnhh ,ikehgyiuhuyogpuyer8i9ye5rho.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:02 pm
by Army of GOD
Maugena wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:f*ck ecards are awful. I hate them and every stupid idiot (redundant) that shares them on Facetbook. inb4 natty: "I DUN HAVE FACETBOOK"

Anyway, that's pretty lame. We've been on Mars before and to say religion as a whole was talking about chicken sandwiches is awe;oirjaewr

My ex shared this on Facebook and I was like... no... this is incorrect and some random was like, "blah blah blah, restating your point in some odd way and then says other shit" and I was like, "Okay... but it wasn't religion that was 'deciding what chicken was okay to eat... I was just stating that this is wrong." And the guy was like, "And I was just stating the error in your point."
My face on the keyboaoprijaspodijfpoasidjfpoasijdfpoasijdfpouhigraeoijnhh ,ikehgyiuhuyogpuyer8i9ye5rho.


I can't stand people who debate issues or post their political/religious beliefs on Facebook. Sadly, compared to CC, they sound utterly uninformed and ignorant.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:04 pm
by Lootifer
Yeh, facey arguments seem so fucking retarded after spending some time around here. You can predict exactly what is going to be said.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:15 pm
by kentington
Lootifer wrote:Yeh, facey arguments seem so fucking retarded after spending some time around here. You can predict exactly what is going to be said.


One of the reasons I don't have facebook. Besides getting cows, trees, and poked every five minutes.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:25 pm
by Phatscotty
religion was on Mars when the dinosaurs ruled our planet.

I hate ecards too. They suck!!!!!

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:34 pm
by nietzsche
Army of GOD wrote:
Maugena wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:f*ck ecards are awful. I hate them and every stupid idiot (redundant) that shares them on Facetbook. inb4 natty: "I DUN HAVE FACETBOOK"

Anyway, that's pretty lame. We've been on Mars before and to say religion as a whole was talking about chicken sandwiches is awe;oirjaewr

My ex shared this on Facebook and I was like... no... this is incorrect and some random was like, "blah blah blah, restating your point in some odd way and then says other shit" and I was like, "Okay... but it wasn't religion that was 'deciding what chicken was okay to eat... I was just stating that this is wrong." And the guy was like, "And I was just stating the error in your point."
My face on the keyboaoprijaspodijfpoasidjfpoasijdfpoasijdfpouhigraeoijnhh ,ikehgyiuhuyogpuyer8i9ye5rho.


I can't stand people who debate issues or post their political/religious beliefs on Facebook. Sadly, compared to CC, they sound utterly uninformed and ignorant.


Yeah, that's one of the reasons I stopped login into FB. I guess most people isn't that educated or can actually think for themselves, they merely repeat the most stupid phrases. And when you respect someone in RL only to see them posting their stupid religious or political views, well, it sucks because it's harder to take them seriously now.

I always love a good debate here on CC, but lately a lot of them are totally biased that you cannot call it other than stupid propaganda, or preaching in the case of the religious nuts.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:49 pm
by Army of GOD
nietzsche wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
Maugena wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:f*ck ecards are awful. I hate them and every stupid idiot (redundant) that shares them on Facetbook. inb4 natty: "I DUN HAVE FACETBOOK"

Anyway, that's pretty lame. We've been on Mars before and to say religion as a whole was talking about chicken sandwiches is awe;oirjaewr

My ex shared this on Facebook and I was like... no... this is incorrect and some random was like, "blah blah blah, restating your point in some odd way and then says other shit" and I was like, "Okay... but it wasn't religion that was 'deciding what chicken was okay to eat... I was just stating that this is wrong." And the guy was like, "And I was just stating the error in your point."
My face on the keyboaoprijaspodijfpoasidjfpoasijdfpoasijdfpouhigraeoijnhh ,ikehgyiuhuyogpuyer8i9ye5rho.


I can't stand people who debate issues or post their political/religious beliefs on Facebook. Sadly, compared to CC, they sound utterly uninformed and ignorant.


Yeah, that's one of the reasons I stopped login into FB. I guess most people isn't that educated or can actually think for themselves, they merely repeat the most stupid phrases. And when you respect someone in RL only to see them posting their stupid religious or political views, well, it sucks because it's harder to take them seriously now.

I always love a good debate here on CC, but lately a lot of them are totally biased that you cannot call it other than stupid propaganda, or preaching in the case of the religious nuts.



Yea, one of my brothers sounds like Phatscotty on Facebook. It's sad, especially knowing his RL personality is wholly different.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:02 pm
by tzor
Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:16 pm
by Army of GOD
tzor wrote:Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.


not sure if trolling or serious

also I thought this was cool Image

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:31 pm
by tzor
Army of GOD wrote:not sure if trolling or serious


A but of both actually. You might want to read "Death from the Skies" by Phil Phlat to see how dangerous the solar system can be.

A lof of calculations for "life" (and by that we don't mean single cell organisms) that exist on earth are often forgotten in simple mass calculations for like potential. The earth has a significant magnetic field. It has a significant orbiting companion that provides significant tidal forces. It also has a dynamic liquid core that keeps the crust active (and also provides that massive dynamo that protects the earth from the solar wind, which also has the nasty tendency to strip a planet's atmosphere).

You are not going to find a nice place like that in the solar system. The moons of Jupiter and Saturn come close, only because the solar effects are greatly reduced at that distance.

Bear in mind that the universe has already given our planet the cosmic finger a number of times. Several major extermination events might be in fact related to cosmic causes. (Events that make the asteroid impact that killed the alreadydying dinosaurs trivial.) Again, read that book from Phlat. A little science can be a dangerous thing; you need to learn a bit more.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:23 am
by BigBallinStalin
Two hundred years from now, a historian stumbles into tzor's post. Upon reading "you are not going to find a nice place like that in the solar system," she laughs.

Her colleague ridicules tzor, but the historian comments about the impossibility of possessing future knowledge; therefore, such ridicule may be unfair in tzor's case.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:03 am
by saxitoxin
Army of GOD wrote:
tzor wrote:Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.


not sure if trolling or serious

also I thought this was cool Image


Word of advice - Gliese 581g girls are hot and loose, but, if you want a chick you can bring home to meet mom, stick with Gliese 581d women. Unfortunately, they're amorphous clouds of ammonia vapor so aren't that fun on a date.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:18 am
by heavycola
tzor wrote: a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine


SCIENCE IS A UNSENITENT

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:19 am
by zimmah
Army of GOD wrote:
tzor wrote:Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.


not sure if trolling or serious

also I thought this was cool Image


even a difference as small as 1% could kill most life on earth.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:11 am
by Neoteny
heavycola wrote:
tzor wrote: a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine


SCIENCE IS A UNSENITENT


HEAVYCOLA IS A NOSTALGIC

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:23 am
by TDK
BigBallinStalin wrote:Two hundred years from now, a historian stumbles into tzor's post. Upon reading "you are not going to find a nice place like that in the solar system," she laughs.

Her colleague ridicules tzor, but the historian comments about the impossibility of possessing future knowledge; therefore, such ridicule may be unfair in tzor's case.


That raises an interesting thought: in 200 years, will the CC servers even be accessible? I'm all for keeping it going, but that would require an inflation- adjusted membership fee... :-$

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 2:43 pm
by PLAYER57832
As much as I would like to say that folks who support Chic Fila are also deniers of the Mars landing, its just not true.

That people are idiotic in one area does not necessarily mean they are universally idiotic. Even among Young Earth supporters, there are few who actually deny that things like the moon landing and Mars landing happened

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:37 pm
by Lootifer
zimmah wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
tzor wrote:Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.


not sure if trolling or serious

also I thought this was cool Image


even a difference as small as 1% could kill most life on earth.

Yes but that doesnt mean we cant adapt to a specific environment given enough input energy.

i.e. There may not be life there, but we could potentially live there.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:39 pm
by rdsrds2120
Lootifer wrote:
zimmah wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
tzor wrote:Dear Science; No you didn't land on Mars, you landed a unsenitent and barely intelligent machine on Mars. You couldn't last five minutes in the smallest of solar storms that frequent the solar system. So please stay inside the nice mangetic field of you planet, that I, your Lord, made for you and not for the other planets, like Mars which has no magnetic field like the earth and no atmosphere to speak of either. Sincerely, Religion's Boss, God.


not sure if trolling or serious

also I thought this was cool Image


even a difference as small as 1% could kill most life on earth.

Yes but that doesnt mean we cant adapt to a specific environment given enough input energy.

i.e. There may not be life there, but we could potentially live there.


NO LOOT, THAT'S OUT OF THE QUESTION. Personally, I think we should clone the Earth. That'd be much better, and sounds to me like more plausible.

-rd

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:53 pm
by Lootifer
Like get a big chain and tie it around Mars then drag is in towards the sun for a few million miles. Then fire some glue at it, then fire the moon at it, blowing up the moon with a big explosion just before it hits (to have like a shotgun effect - so all the little bits of the moon stick to the previously fired glue - to make it bigger durr!).

Then like get a really big bubble blower ring thing (will need lots of soap suds for this one) and blow some really big bubbles and send them at mars so it gets some atmosphere. Boom new earth.

f*ck im smart sometimes.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:18 pm
by crispybits
You forgot the bit where we create giant magnets all over Mars surface to give it the field to protect against solar winds.

Re: Technicality?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:32 pm
by Lootifer
crispybits wrote:You forgot the bit where we create giant magnets all over Mars surface to give it the field to protect against solar winds.

THE SOLAR WINDS NOOOOOoooOOOOOooooo *gets blown off his nice new shiney mars surface*