Sure, there is some truth to what he says. A lot of people will vote for Republican candidates no matter what, a lot of people will vote for Democrat candidates no matter what. A lot of people live in districts that lean strongly towards the republican or strongly towards the democrat party, if one lives in such a district and disagrees with the majority of voters in that district there's not much incentive to vote. The people who need to be convinced are the ones who live in places that don't lean strongly towards either major party and might go either way.
A democrat presidential candidate saying that people who vote republican aren't dependent on the state, pay income tax, and take responsibility for their own lives is a great way to rally the republican voter base and raise turnout in swing districts. It really is amazing how O'bama manages to nail that coffin shut while being inside of it. Maybe he's a plant. The republican party infiltrated the democrat party and placed O'bama there so he would purposely lose to Romney.
Honestly, I cannot envision a scenario at this point in which he loses the election without some sort of a major scandal (and by "scandal", I mean an actual scandal, not an "I don't like this policy of his" scandal).
And you guys seem to agree with me, because you sound exceptionally desperate.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:06 pm
by Phatscotty
Absolutely priceless! MSNBC refuses to play the Obama video because it "might not be authentic", however, MSNBC had no problem the day before airing Romney's unauthentic comments.....and this is even after the White House authenticated the Obama redistrubiton of wealth tapes! Pathetic!
Progressive Inception that is being planted in your brain.... "the Obama tape is not authentic" when it is, but the Romney tape was fair game, even though there are 2 minutes missing from the Romney video.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:21 am
by jonesthecurl
Let's do the Time Warp again...
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:26 am
by Symmetry
It's sort of cute that he tried a parody.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:44 am
by Phatscotty
Symmetry wrote:It's sort of cute that he tried a parody.
It's even cuter that the video in your thread is unauthentic and edited.
My video has been authenticated by the white house....talk about a parody?
You are one
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:19 am
by GreecePwns
Keep defending the man and the party that effectively smashed your alleged movement within it in one fell swoop. You're sounding very authentic right now.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:09 am
by Evil Semp
This is politics!!! You get all bent out of shape when the other side of the argument does it but not when people on your side of the argument do it. They misquote and edit videos to discredit the opposition. It makes me think of people who start a thread on a forum and keep changing the title to mislead people.
I think the video you have in this thread proves how it works. When I first heard the "you didn't build that" it didn't include the line about the roads and bridges.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:41 am
by Johnny Rockets
A man can't change his views, or opinions, after 14 years???? You can't be flexible in your political beliefs in 14 years? ('know....to change with the times?) You can't LEARN through events and experience and then change your opinions or the way you do things in 14 years? You are destined to follow one path, because you refused to evolve your politics or thinking??
What the phuck, phatty.
Tell me, does beating a dead horse sound much like beating a carpet filled with steak?
JRock
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:24 am
by The Bison King
Wow! Totally nailed him!!! You totally caught him stating a policy that most people were already aware of, and that many people agree with!
It's just a tad bit different than someone running for president saying that he doesn't care about half of the population.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:35 am
by Woodruff
Phatscotty wrote:Absolutely priceless! MSNBC refuses to play the Obama video because it "might not be authentic", however, MSNBC had no problem the day before airing Romney's unauthentic comments.....and this is even after the White House authenticated the Obama redistrubiton of wealth tapes! Pathetic!
If only you held Fox News to the same (or even a similar yet not-even-close) standard.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:14 pm
by Phatscotty
GreecePwns wrote:Keep defending the man and the party that effectively smashed your alleged movement within it in one fell swoop. You're sounding very authentic right now.
I'm calling out the media. And I'm well aware of what happened to my movement, faaaaar more aware than most...
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:17 pm
by Phatscotty
Johnny Rockets wrote:A man can't change his views, or opinions, after 14 years???? You can't be flexible in your political beliefs in 14 years? ('know....to change with the times?) You can't LEARN through events and experience and then change your opinions or the way you do things in 14 years? You are destined to follow one path, because you refused to evolve your politics or thinking??
What the phuck, phatty.
Tell me, does beating a dead horse sound much like beating a carpet filled with steak?
JRock
It's simply a response to the Romney 47% crap, in the same kind of crappy BS manner. BOTH are equally ridiculous
Evil Semp nailed it, except the part about changing thread titles.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:19 pm
by Phatscotty
The Bison King wrote:Wow! Totally nailed him!!! You totally caught him stating a policy that most people were already aware of, and that many people agree with!
It's just a tad bit different than someone running for president saying that he doesn't care about half of the population.
It could just as easily be twisted, in exactly the same way you twist it, to make a bs point that Obama doesn't care about half the population either, based on the idea that he wants higher taxes for taxpayers....which is half the country
Romney and Obama have similar problems, just at opposite ends of the spectrum. Romney has to work a lot harder to get the votes of people who do not pay taxes but also receive handouts, and Obama has to work a lot harder to get the votes of people who pay plenty of taxes but are constantly asking themselves "what the hell do I get for350$/week in taxes?" because they aren't taking any handouts.
A daunting task for both of them
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:22 pm
by AndyDufresne
Phatscotty wrote:It could just as easily be twisted, in exactly the same way you twist it, to make a bs point that Obama doesn't care about half the population either, based on the idea that he wants higher taxes for taxpayers....which is half the country
Hm, so the logic here is that no taxes = complete bear-hug-love of the country, right?
--Andy
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:29 pm
by Phatscotty
AndyDufresne wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:It could just as easily be twisted, in exactly the same way you twist it, to make a bs point that Obama doesn't care about half the population either, based on the idea that he wants higher taxes for taxpayers....which is half the country
Hm, so the logic here is that no taxes = complete bear-hug-love of the country, right?
--Andy
I don't even know what to say to that, except only the purest and most devoted Anarchist would seriously attempt to make a case for "no taxes". But I do not know a single person who believes that we should have "no taxes", nor have I heard of a single person advocating for "no taxes"...wait, actually that's not true. Come to think of it, I have heard many many people from the left speaking something about "no taxes".... they seem to bring it up a lot.
hmmmmmm
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:46 pm
by AndyDufresne
I am just trying to understand your logic, since you mentioned that raising taxes is equal to not caring about those who pay them, thus no taxes is the maximum amount of care?
--Andy
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:59 pm
by Phatscotty
AndyDufresne wrote:I am just trying to understand your logic, since you mentioned that raising taxes is equal to not caring about those who pay them, thus no taxes is the maximum amount of care?
--Andy
The post you responded to was not meant for you, or for you to understand. If your post is serious, you'll have to reword it.
I'm using ObamaRomney logic, mixed in with the previous posters logic. If you want to ask me anything, go ahead! Let's have some fun!
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:07 pm
by comic boy
Obama = Election winner. Mittens = Election loser. Case is closed , those that dont like it will just have to suck it up and try again in 4 years , gonna be much harder then though because the economy will be a lot stronger.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:46 pm
by BigBallinStalin
AndyDufresne wrote:I am just trying to understand your logic, since you mentioned that raising taxes is equal to not caring about those who pay them, thus no taxes is the maximum amount of care?
--Andy
Andy, as a Welfare Liberal, I care about you so much that I am going to tax you 120%.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:57 pm
by patrickaa317
comic boy wrote:Obama = Election winner. Mittens = Election loser. Case is closed , those that dont like it will just have to suck it up and try again in 4 years , gonna be much harder then though because the economy will be a lot stronger.
Sure the hell hope it isn't any weaker.
If Obama is reelected, I wouldn't be surprised to start hearing of talks of removing term limits.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:01 pm
by patrickaa317
Johnny Rockets wrote:A man can't change his views, or opinions, after 14 years???? You can't be flexible in your political beliefs in 14 years? ('know....to change with the times?) You can't LEARN through events and experience and then change your opinions or the way you do things in 14 years? You are destined to follow one path, because you refused to evolve your politics or thinking??
What the phuck, phatty.
Tell me, does beating a dead horse sound much like beating a carpet filled with steak?
JRock
hey Jrock, can you provide some clear examples of his actions to where it would appear that he doesn't believe in it?
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:15 pm
by Woodruff
Phatscotty wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:Keep defending the man and the party that effectively smashed your alleged movement within it in one fell swoop. You're sounding very authentic right now.
I'm calling out the media.
Well, one side of it anyway.
Phatscotty wrote:And I'm well aware of what happened to my movement, faaaaar more aware than most...
So what you're saying is that you're the modern-day equivalent of Judas? Enjoy your pieces of silver.
Re: Obamashambles, Loses Election?
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:22 am
by comic boy
patrickaa317 wrote:
comic boy wrote:Obama = Election winner. Mittens = Election loser. Case is closed , those that dont like it will just have to suck it up and try again in 4 years , gonna be much harder then though because the economy will be a lot stronger.
Sure the hell hope it isn't any weaker.
If Obama is reelected, I wouldn't be surprised to start hearing of talks of removing term limits.
I would be even more surprised if you gave Obama any credit whatsoever if the economy does improve significantly.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:10 pm
