Conquer Club

Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Should NASA turn Voyager I around and bring it back to Earth?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby dyrtydog on Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:49 pm

This story has already been written. Vgr will send out signals while broken on an alien planet, and Kirk and crew will investigate this "god" only to discover it was Voyager 1
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class dyrtydog
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: central Florida

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:00 pm

maxfaraday wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?


No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."


Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?


Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.


They did not give it solar panels? It could communicate forever.


Even solar panels have a lifespan.
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby dyrtydog on Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:05 pm

not if they were made of Twinkies
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class dyrtydog
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: central Florida

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Dukasaur on Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:06 pm

dyrtydog wrote:This story has already been written. Vgr will send out signals while broken on an alien planet, and Kirk and crew will investigate this "god" only to discover it was Voyager 1

Finally, someone points out the obvious!
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Captain Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 27015
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Timminz on Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:30 pm

Who are we trying to trap here?
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby notyou2 on Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:35 pm

Trekkies and it's working.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Postby 2dimes on Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:10 pm

Timminz wrote:Who are we trying to trap here?

Andy.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 12666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby saxitoxin on Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:15 am

Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?


No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."


!!!!!!!!!!!TRAP THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SAXI TRAPPED METSFANMAX!

OH YEAH, SAXI'S THE GREATEST! SAXI'S THE GREATEST!

Image

Image
Image
I STAND WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12089
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby nietzsche on Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:23 am

hahaha
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
General nietzsche
 
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:26 am

Metsfanmax wrote:
maxfaraday wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Should NASA turn it around and put the pedal to the metal to get it back to the Earth?


No. The idea has always been to keep going and explore more about the boundary between our solar system and the rest of our galaxy. It will keep doing so even after it runs out of "gas."


Yeah but can it communicate without "juice"?


Sort of. It will keep going for a few years before 2025 with enough power left to send signals, but not to run its main scientific instruments.


They did not give it solar panels? It could communicate forever.


Solar panel technology barely existed in 1977.


But it will solve all our problems in 2013
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:20 am

saxitoxin wrote:

!!!!!!!!!!!TRAP THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SAXI TRAPPED METSFANMAX!

OH YEAH, SAXI'S THE GREATEST! SAXI'S THE GREATEST!

Image

Image


There, there, saxi. I think you need a little lie-down. It's only a game, honey.
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Metsfanmax on Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:27 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:Solar panel technology barely existed in 1977.


But it will solve all our problems in 2013


It's amazing what we can do with technology in the span of only a few decades, right?

BTW: Trap thread's not fair when you're listed by name in the very first post!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:37 am

I never thought this thread was a trap but I'm offended in that I think it is biased towards Astrophysicists. :cry:
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Pedronicus on Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:06 pm

I've stopped posting in here because of all the saxi trap threads. They scare me.
Image
Highest position 7th. Highest points 3311 All of my graffiti can be found here
Major Pedronicus
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Busy not shitting you....

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:30 pm

Yeah, saxi is way above creating a trap thread. He's a gentleman and a scholar. Shame on you for even suggesting such a thing timminz. :evil:

Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Army of GOD on Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:38 pm

uh oh, saxi posted bellsprout. This is definitely a trapthread for me.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7187
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:43 pm

Army of GOD wrote:uh oh, saxi posted bellsprout. This is definitely a trapthread for me.


Ditto.
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Army of GOD on Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:47 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:uh oh, saxi posted bellsprout. This is definitely a trapthread for me.


Ditto.


Image
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7187
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:07 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:uh oh, saxi posted bellsprout. This is definitely a trapthread for me.


Ditto.


Image


Hehe, wasn't sure if you'd catch that or not.
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Army of GOD on Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:52 pm

shut up
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7187
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:55 pm

Image
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Funkyterrance on Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:01 pm

Army of GOD wrote:shut up


Lick my pokeballs.

Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Postby 2dimes on Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:47 pm

Is it beyond half way yet?
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 12666
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby whitestazn88 on Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:36 am

just to clarify something, solar panels would stop working on the voyager like.... around uranus? i don't know exactly where, but they're not very efficient, and the strength of the sun is not strong enough that far from it, and once it passes the kuiper belt (if it even had that capability), it would still be 4.some light years away from the nearest star, so I doubt it could draw power from any light source.

shit, our solar system is so big that voyager 1, given infinite fuel, probably won't even reach the oort cloud by the time humanity has destroyed itself.
Lieutenant whitestazn88
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: behind you

Re: Should NASA turn Voyager I back around?

Postby Dukasaur on Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:26 am

whitestazn88 wrote:just to clarify something, solar panels would stop working on the voyager like.... around uranus? i don't know exactly where, but they're not very efficient, and the strength of the sun is not strong enough that far from it, and once it passes the kuiper belt (if it even had that capability), it would still be 4.some light years away from the nearest star, so I doubt it could draw power from any light source.

shit, our solar system is so big that voyager 1, given infinite fuel, probably won't even reach the oort cloud by the time humanity has destroyed itself.

Just to clarify, the light is indeed too dim where the Voyagers (1 and 2) are now for solar panels to have any effect. However, the Voyagers are powered by RTG nuclear reactors and 4 of the 10 scientific instruments on board Voyager 1 and 5 of the 10 scientific instruments on board Voyager 2 are still functioning.

They are also still under their own propulsion and accelerating. Voyager 1 is expected to encounter another star system first: within 40,000 years. They are heading in different directions, although both are riding the bow of the Heliosheath and are expected to break out into open space within a decade.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Captain Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 27015
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Next

Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: pmac666