Moderator: Community Team
john9blue wrote:all right, that's it. i'm gonna start a bunch of dumb threads like you guys do just so i get noticed
notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
What? You don't. This is statistics. You just use the data to make broad, derogatory generalizations.
Neoteny wrote:notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
What? You don't. This is statistics. You just use the data to make broad, derogatory generalizations.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
What? You don't. This is statistics. You just use the data to make broad, derogatory generalizations.
Sure, you can. Everyone who is equal to or above 3.3% is an asshole. Those who are below are awesome. Insert labels. Done!
AndyDufresne wrote: And I suspect the reasoning regarding those who have a few usual adversaries (I.E. Night Strike, Phattscotty, etc) usually don't get the last word in.
Funkyterrance wrote:AndyDufresne wrote: And I suspect the reasoning regarding those who have a few usual adversaries (I.E. Night Strike, Phattscotty, etc) usually don't get the last word in.
Interesting, because I figured that those who have regular adversaries would have a higher percentage since they would tend to bicker back and forth well beyond the point where everyone else lost interest lol. The endings would be split between the two rivals, thus giving them a higher percentage of those people who didn't have regular rivals.
notyou2 wrote:In fairness to FT, I think most have his initial posts have been outside of Ad Hominem. I believe he only started to post a great deal in AH part way through 2012.
Run this again in a year and I bet FT moves up the list. Or run it from say last August to present.
notyou2 wrote:In fairness to FT, I think most have his initial posts have been outside of Ad Hominem. I believe he only started to post a great deal in AH part way through 2012.
Symmetry wrote:Wouldn't you just have to filter out any topic titles with [Locked] in them? That'd likely get most of them.
Neoteny wrote:notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
What? You don't. This is statistics. You just use the data to make broad, derogatory generalizations.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
What? You don't. This is statistics. You just use the data to make broad, derogatory generalizations.
Sure, you can. Everyone who is equal to or above 3.3% is an asshole. Those who are below are awesome. Insert labels. Done!
2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:notyou2 wrote:NS is at the low end. I think this is because he has so many opponents to what spews from his fingers that people won't let him have the last word.
Haggis, how do you account for personality issues that influence the percentages?
What? You don't. This is statistics. You just use the data to make broad, derogatory generalizations.
Sure, you can. Everyone who is equal to or above 3.3% is an asshole. Those who are below are awesome. Insert labels. Done!
Ouchie.
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur, mookiemcgee, pmac666