Page 1 of 1

saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:36 am
by nietzsche
unacceptable

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:43 am
by rdsrds2120
I blame the free market. We need to have a well-regulated federally required minimum number of times saxi can post in a day.

BMO

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:34 am
by BigBallinStalin
And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:40 am
by rdsrds2120
BigBallinStalin wrote:And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.


Perhaps a disincentive for this voluntary exchange has occurred. We're smokin' 'em out!

BMO

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:50 am
by BigBallinStalin
rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.


Perhaps a disincentive for this voluntary exchange has occurred. We're smokin' 'em out!

BMO


NO! We should tax or hit saxitoxin for every lame posts he makes. This will definitely encourage him to do better. Why? Because this is the logic of environmental regulation and prison systems, which obviously are fab.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:03 am
by rdsrds2120
BigBallinStalin wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.


Perhaps a disincentive for this voluntary exchange has occurred. We're smokin' 'em out!

BMO


NO! We should tax or hit saxitoxin for every lame posts he makes. This will definitely encourage him to do better. Why? Because this is the logic of environmental regulation and prison systems, which obviously are fab.


Now you're just trying to trap me :P

BMO

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:11 am
by BigBallinStalin
rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.


Perhaps a disincentive for this voluntary exchange has occurred. We're smokin' 'em out!

BMO


NO! We should tax or hit saxitoxin for every lame posts he makes. This will definitely encourage him to do better. Why? Because this is the logic of environmental regulation and prison systems, which obviously are fab.


Now you're just trying to trap me :P

BMO


No, no! Do go on! Without CC intervention, our saxitoxin quality will surely decrease.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:45 am
by thegreekdog
BigBallinStalin wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.


Perhaps a disincentive for this voluntary exchange has occurred. We're smokin' 'em out!

BMO


NO! We should tax or hit saxitoxin for every lame posts he makes. This will definitely encourage him to do better. Why? Because this is the logic of environmental regulation and prison systems, which obviously are fab.


I just hope, 15 years later, we also subject other posters to the same taxation standards; otherwise, Saxi won't be competitive relative to others.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:55 pm
by BigBallinStalin
thegreekdog wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:And that is how you gain the benefits of voluntary exchange.

BMO, you make me proud.


Perhaps a disincentive for this voluntary exchange has occurred. We're smokin' 'em out!

BMO


NO! We should tax or hit saxitoxin for every lame posts he makes. This will definitely encourage him to do better. Why? Because this is the logic of environmental regulation and prison systems, which obviously are fab.


I just hope, 15 years later, we also subject other posters to the same taxation standards; otherwise, Saxi won't be competitive relative to others.


It depends on how many each state-provided resources each consumer/producer consumes.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:20 pm
by notyou2
We need a state sponsored welfare receiving bleeding heart social communist to counter Saxi's free market, right wing, libertarian capitalist streak.

Nominations are open.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2013 5:41 pm
by Gillipig
notyou2 wrote:We need a state sponsored welfare receiving bleeding heart social communist to counter Saxi's free market, right wing, libertarian capitalist streak.

Nominations are open.

Well I am a Swede.....

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2013 9:10 am
by notyou2
Gillipig wrote:
notyou2 wrote:We need a state sponsored welfare receiving bleeding heart social communist to counter Saxi's free market, right wing, libertarian capitalist streak.

Nominations are open.

Well I am a Swede.....


Are you on welfare? You meet all the other prerequisites.

Re: saxi only posted twice today

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2013 6:03 pm
by Gillipig
notyou2 wrote:
Gillipig wrote:
notyou2 wrote:We need a state sponsored welfare receiving bleeding heart social communist to counter Saxi's free market, right wing, libertarian capitalist streak.

Nominations are open.

Well I am a Swede.....


Are you on welfare? You meet all the other prerequisites.

Your question is obsolete, everyone in Sweden is on welfare. Thus, Swede = on welfare