Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
saxitoxin wrote:Gillipig wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Gillipig wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Gillipig wrote:Two words, space flight! But since he's Mexican I doubt he has he dough.
Interestingly, I just checked, and that would make you only the second Swede in the history of the human species to have ever entered space (tied with Mongolia). Though four Mexicans have traveled to the final frontier (five with nietzsche).
I think Gillpig's brashness must be how Neanderthals boasted about their glory days at the dawn of homo sapien.
Viva la Raza
Tss irrelevant information as per usual saxi. This is what matters:
Bnp per capita (the number is in thousands of dollars per year)
Sweden 41,191
Mexico 15,312
The average Swede makes almost three times as much money as the average mexican, who was caveman now again?
Sweden's French king has done a good job getting the Swedes to dig up gold, but any people can be forced to work. They can't be forced to become adventurous, curious people willing to step outdoors. That's why only one Swede has been found willing to travel to space, while there have been four Mexicans.
Sweden is an old oak tree slowly wasting away. Mexico is a young sapling growing bigger and stronger.
Again you ramble. The last thing you said made no sense at all. And the Swedish king is not the reason we're wealthy, the Swedish people is the reason we're doing good. What does that say about the mexican people?
"We're doing good" is what the Neanderthals said until Homo Sapien was strong enough to take away the Neanderthals wealth - then drive them over a cliff. Sweden reached a certain point and stopped evolving (only one Swede in space, the same number as Mongolia). Mexico hasn't reached that point but is still evolving.
Soon, like Neanderthal, your things will be taken away and you will be drove off a cliff. But the best qualities of Swedes will be preserved and assimilated into La Raza through the DNA of your females.
Gillpig - your great grandson 150 years from now will be named JosƩ (not Sven) and he will eat tamales (not meatballs).
AndyDufresne wrote:Based on these two posts:
12 hours of engaging in stupid trolling flaming bullshit (which includes, but is not limited to: posting sarcastic one-liners and youtube videos; circle jerking; and other pathetic endeavors).
--Andy
Army of GOD wrote:11.999999 hours of me slapping him in the face with my cock
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
12 hours of explaining to john the value of mocking crazy people who have proved to be immune to rational discourse, and the danger inherent in lending credibility to these crazies by explaining the facts to them for the 57000th time.
Funkyterrance wrote:For serious?
Just hypothetically speaking, who is more pitiful? The "crazy" person or the person trying to explain to/laughing at the crazy person? And that's even assuming the "non-crazy" person has for certain a better understanding of the universe.
Let me ask all you haters something. Who is your favorite Stooge? If it's not Moe, you are all a bunch of hypocrites.
betiko wrote:Army of GOD wrote:11.999999 hours of me slapping him in the face with my cock
we have a word for this in french, no kidding. It's called a "biffle". comes from "bite"=dick and "giffle"= slap in the face.
Therefore, can I invent a new english verb, "to dilap"? (or being a none english speaker I can't be granted this priviledge?)
"Will liked to bully, he dilapped all his friends for no reason."
nietzsche wrote:BBS, what's the resolution of your screen?
Haggis_McMutton wrote:If the crazy person keeps to himself, that's fine. But when he starts raving about "dem muslims" and "the huge conspiracy to send our kids to hell by teaching them we come from dirty apes" then the correct course of action is to A. try debating them and B. if they show they are unwilling or unable to engage in meaningful debate, then mock them.
And I have no idea, never watched that.
AndyDufresne wrote:nietzsche wrote:BBS, what's the resolution of your screen?
BBS owns and operates an IMAX theatre actually.
--Andy
betiko wrote:Army of GOD wrote:11.999999 hours of me slapping him in the face with my cock
we have a word for this in french, no kidding. It's called a "biffle". comes from "bite"=dick and "giffle"= slap in the face.
Therefore, can I invent a new english verb, "to dilap"? (or being a none english speaker I can't be granted this priviledge?)
"Will liked to bully, he dilapped all his friends for no reason."
notyou2 wrote:NEXT!!!
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:For serious?
Just hypothetically speaking, who is more pitiful? The "crazy" person or the person trying to explain to/laughing at the crazy person? And that's even assuming the "non-crazy" person has for certain a better understanding of the universe.
Let me ask all you haters something. Who is your favorite Stooge? If it's not Moe, you are all a bunch of hypocrites.
Let's not forget that the crazy person is trying to convince us that we're all stupid/going to hell/hate white people/etc. I'm not just going in his house and yelling at him.
If the crazy person keeps to himself, that's fine. But when he starts raving about "dem muslims" and "the huge conspiracy to send our kids to hell by teaching them we come from dirty apes" then the correct course of action is to A. try debating them and B. if they show they are unwilling or unable to engage in meaningful debate, then mock them.
And I have no idea, never watched that.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee