Page 1 of 1

New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 5:29 pm
by BigBallinStalin
Whenever you've reached an "Agree to Disagree" position with someone,
both parties must immediately fighting a 1v1 to settle the issue--forever
(or until new data is introduced!--haha, lolol!).

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 5:33 pm
by Evil Semp
I agree to disagree on how to settle this issue.

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:12 pm
by patches70
That's not a bad idea. PS and Woodruff would have about 50 games going at one time. It might be hard to remember which game corresponds with which argument though. Is there a way to name the game specific to the argument in question that is being decided?

What about freebies who have multiple disagreements but can only have 4 games going at a time? Are additional argument resolution fights put on hold on a first come first fought basis? Does this policy only apply to OT, or also to the rest of the forum as well? I agree that BBS should use his copious free time to keep track of all arguments in all forums on all topics. After all, there can be multiple arguments in a single thread. Someone has to keep track.

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:28 pm
by BigBallinStalin
patches70 wrote:That's not a bad idea. PS and Woodruff would have about 50 games going at one time. It might be hard to remember which game corresponds with which argument though. Is there a way to name the game specific to the argument in question that is being decided?

What about freebies who have multiple disagreements but can only have 4 games going at a time? Are additional argument resolution fights put on hold on a first come first fought basis? Does this policy only apply to OT, or also to the rest of the forum as well? I agree that BBS should use his copious free time to keep track of all arguments in all forums on all topics. After all, there can be multiple arguments in a single thread. Someone has to keep track.


That reminds me: "Argumentum de Fisticuffs," but it wasn't Latin enough.

You know what I mean, my Latin peoples?

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:20 pm
by Evil Semp
Image

Do you agree? Dices at DAWN!!!!!!!!

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:35 pm
by DoomYoshi
Well, this is pretty much the only chance I will ever have to share my favorite song.



DICES AT NOON would be better.

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

PostPosted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:29 am
by BigBallinStalin
Evil Semp wrote:Image

Do you agree? Dices at DAWN!!!!!!!!



Why don't you say that to my face?!