Conquer Club

Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Sat Oct 03, 2015 11:49 am

Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world

Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Looks like things are getting serous, US hegemony is under threat of Russia, and not only Russia :)
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:27 pm

Image
ImageImage
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12045
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby Bernie Sanders on Sat Oct 03, 2015 12:47 pm

Russia's economy is collapsing.

China's economy is fast declining.

Lavrov is just being a good Putin stooge.

Russia and China are both a threat to their neighbors.

Enough said.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:12 pm

You sound like Hitler in February 1942, Ink ... "everything looks rosy in Berlin!"

Lavrov has the capability to see more than 3 months down the road and he can see the trendline for America. He knows one of the harshest winters on record is coming for a gas-dependent Europe. He sees that the disastrous corporatist and pro-war policies of Obama will likely lead to the election of a right-wing lunatic as U.S. president that will push Europe out-of-sync from American goals. He sees the western alliance crumbling and then shifting, as futures are already slowly starting to show -

Jeremy Corbyn has hinted that Britain should seek warmer diplomatic relations with Russia as he called for the UK to treat its international opponents with more respect.

With the hard-left MP heading for a landslide victory in the Labour leadership contest after a poll put him on 53 per cent of the vote, his policy stances are becoming increasingly important as the prospect of him being the official leader of the Opposition edges closer to reality.

In an interview with the state-run Russia Today TV station, which Mr Corbyn has made favourable remarks towards in the past, he suggested national security would be rethought if he was elected Prime Minister.

Last year, he said that although Russia's behaviour and expansion in Ukraine could not be condoned, nor was it "unprovoked".

He also accused NATO and Europe of fuelling the crisis, and called for a " whole new approach to foreign policyā€.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 49856.html


American hegemony is utterly doomed but, like Germans in winter 1942, still thinks things are going well and are looking at 7-day indicators to predict its 7-year future. And once America trips, Israel - deprived of American guns and welfare checks - will be ground into a fine, powdery dust in 10 seconds flat.

Humanity always advances and the forces of progress always win. America can't stop it.
ImageImage
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12045
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby Bernie Sanders on Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:17 pm

Image
When will progress come to Russia?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby Bernie Sanders on Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:20 pm

In Russia:

A judge appears from the courtroom, bursting with laughter.

"What's the matter?" his colleagues ask.

"Oh, I've just heard such a hilarious joke," the judge answers.

"Well, tell it to us then," the colleagues say.

"I can't," replies the judge. "I've just sentenced some poor sod to 10 years for it."
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:24 pm

Becoming hard to keep track of all the political prisoners the U.S. regime has locked-up, Ink, or who have been forced to become refugees and flee.

Image
Image
Image
Last edited by saxitoxin on Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12045
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby WingCmdr Ginkapo on Sat Oct 03, 2015 1:29 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:Russia's economy is collapsing.

China's economy is fast declining.

Lavrov is just being a good Putin stooge.

Russia and China are both a threat to their neighbors.

Enough said.


And Britain still has the greatest empire the world has ever seen. Times change, nations come and go.
User avatar
Major WingCmdr Ginkapo
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:57 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:35 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:Russia's economy is collapsing.

China's economy is fast declining.

Lavrov is just being a good Putin stooge.

Russia and China are both a threat to their neighbors.

Enough said.

Lavrov is probably one of the best politicians in the world today... He managed to make jackass from John Kerry way too many times :lol:
Because China got cold doesn't mean it will collapse... after all China is driving worlds growth in the last 7-8 years.
Russia is US(and yours) worst nightmare :lol: So BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID :D
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby subtleknifewield on Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:05 pm

Frankly I'm surprised mrs. hasn't commented on this thread :P
Sergeant 1st Class subtleknifewield
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:06 pm

Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby AndyDufresne on Thu Oct 29, 2015 3:11 pm

User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby saxitoxin on Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:26 pm

The European "Anti-Russia" coalition is America trying to herd cats ...

Sarkozyā€™s Russian fling

Once upon a time, Nicolas Sarkozy was such a fervent admirer of the United States that an American diplomat described him in 2009 as ā€œthe most pro-American French president since World War II,ā€ according to a Wikileaks embassy cable.

That version of Sarkozy seems to be lost, replaced by one whose gaze points east. On Thursday, the conservative leader of the ā€œRĆ©publicainsā€ party is heading with a small delegation to Moscow, where he will sit down for a face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

A party official traveling with Sarkozy to Moscow described the trip as little more than a courtesy visit to Putin, whom Sarkozy has taken to calling a ā€œfriendā€ since he left office three years ago.

When talking about Russia, the Sarkozy of yore peppered his speeches with warnings about human rights abuses and what he called the ā€œbrutalityā€ of Putinā€™s behavior in asserting his countryā€™s energy policy interests in its region. On his maiden trip to Moscow as head of state in 2007, Sarkozy told a group of students after a tense meeting with Putin that it was ā€œso great to live in a democracy,ā€ and that he wished his audience would one day share that privilege.

Yet that pro-democracy honk has vanished from Sarkozyā€™s speeches.

As for the United States, a country which Sarkozy has advertised no plans to visit, his tone has turned cold.

ā€œI told [U.S. President Barack Obama] to take good care of the United States and leave Europe to us,ā€ Sarkozy recently told an audience in Limoges, referring to a 2009 conversation about the accession of Turkey to the European Union. ā€œI wanted to give him a lesson in geography.ā€

In early 2015, Sarkozy defended Russiaā€™s annexation of Crimea, saying that France did not want a resurgence of the Cold War.

Yet Sarkozy, who has met personally with Putin twice after leaving office, but never as head of the RĆ©publicains, has stuck to his conciliatory line on Russia, even when it closely echoes the overtly pro-Russian statements of Le Pen.

The two men will discuss the Syrian situation, the fight against ISIL and probably the Russian embargo on European agricultural products. Sarkozy will also address students at a prestigious Moscow university, as part of a trip that his entourage said was set up months ago, before Russia started a bombing campaign in Syria.

http://www.politico.eu/article/sarkozy- ... ed-states/


From France, to Britain, to Italy, to Finland, every major power in Europe has a pro-Russian opposition party a year or less away from winning elections against an unpopular incumbent government.

The gun America is pointing at Russia today could turn around to point right back at it overnight.
ImageImage
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12045
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby Bernie Sanders on Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:31 pm

saxitoxin wrote:The European "Anti-Russia" coalition is America trying to herd cats ...

Sarkozyā€™s Russian fling

Once upon a time, Nicolas Sarkozy was such a fervent admirer of the United States that an American diplomat described him in 2009 as ā€œthe most pro-American French president since World War II,ā€ according to a Wikileaks embassy cable.

That version of Sarkozy seems to be lost, replaced by one whose gaze points east. On Thursday, the conservative leader of the ā€œRĆ©publicainsā€ party is heading with a small delegation to Moscow, where he will sit down for a face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

A party official traveling with Sarkozy to Moscow described the trip as little more than a courtesy visit to Putin, whom Sarkozy has taken to calling a ā€œfriendā€ since he left office three years ago.

When talking about Russia, the Sarkozy of yore peppered his speeches with warnings about human rights abuses and what he called the ā€œbrutalityā€ of Putinā€™s behavior in asserting his countryā€™s energy policy interests in its region. On his maiden trip to Moscow as head of state in 2007, Sarkozy told a group of students after a tense meeting with Putin that it was ā€œso great to live in a democracy,ā€ and that he wished his audience would one day share that privilege.

Yet that pro-democracy honk has vanished from Sarkozyā€™s speeches.

As for the United States, a country which Sarkozy has advertised no plans to visit, his tone has turned cold.

ā€œI told [U.S. President Barack Obama] to take good care of the United States and leave Europe to us,ā€ Sarkozy recently told an audience in Limoges, referring to a 2009 conversation about the accession of Turkey to the European Union. ā€œI wanted to give him a lesson in geography.ā€

In early 2015, Sarkozy defended Russiaā€™s annexation of Crimea, saying that France did not want a resurgence of the Cold War.

Yet Sarkozy, who has met personally with Putin twice after leaving office, but never as head of the RĆ©publicains, has stuck to his conciliatory line on Russia, even when it closely echoes the overtly pro-Russian statements of Le Pen.

The two men will discuss the Syrian situation, the fight against ISIL and probably the Russian embargo on European agricultural products. Sarkozy will also address students at a prestigious Moscow university, as part of a trip that his entourage said was set up months ago, before Russia started a bombing campaign in Syria.

http://www.politico.eu/article/sarkozy- ... ed-states/


From France, to Britain, to Italy, to Finland, every major power in Europe has a pro-Russian opposition party a year or less away from winning elections against an unpopular incumbent government.

The gun America is pointing at Russia today could turn around to point right back at it overnight.


Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:40 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:The European "Anti-Russia" coalition is America trying to herd cats ...

Sarkozyā€™s Russian fling

Once upon a time, Nicolas Sarkozy was such a fervent admirer of the United States that an American diplomat described him in 2009 as ā€œthe most pro-American French president since World War II,ā€ according to a Wikileaks embassy cable.

That version of Sarkozy seems to be lost, replaced by one whose gaze points east. On Thursday, the conservative leader of the ā€œRĆ©publicainsā€ party is heading with a small delegation to Moscow, where he will sit down for a face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

A party official traveling with Sarkozy to Moscow described the trip as little more than a courtesy visit to Putin, whom Sarkozy has taken to calling a ā€œfriendā€ since he left office three years ago.

When talking about Russia, the Sarkozy of yore peppered his speeches with warnings about human rights abuses and what he called the ā€œbrutalityā€ of Putinā€™s behavior in asserting his countryā€™s energy policy interests in its region. On his maiden trip to Moscow as head of state in 2007, Sarkozy told a group of students after a tense meeting with Putin that it was ā€œso great to live in a democracy,ā€ and that he wished his audience would one day share that privilege.

Yet that pro-democracy honk has vanished from Sarkozyā€™s speeches.

As for the United States, a country which Sarkozy has advertised no plans to visit, his tone has turned cold.

ā€œI told [U.S. President Barack Obama] to take good care of the United States and leave Europe to us,ā€ Sarkozy recently told an audience in Limoges, referring to a 2009 conversation about the accession of Turkey to the European Union. ā€œI wanted to give him a lesson in geography.ā€

In early 2015, Sarkozy defended Russiaā€™s annexation of Crimea, saying that France did not want a resurgence of the Cold War.

Yet Sarkozy, who has met personally with Putin twice after leaving office, but never as head of the RĆ©publicains, has stuck to his conciliatory line on Russia, even when it closely echoes the overtly pro-Russian statements of Le Pen.

The two men will discuss the Syrian situation, the fight against ISIL and probably the Russian embargo on European agricultural products. Sarkozy will also address students at a prestigious Moscow university, as part of a trip that his entourage said was set up months ago, before Russia started a bombing campaign in Syria.

http://www.politico.eu/article/sarkozy- ... ed-states/


From France, to Britain, to Italy, to Finland, every major power in Europe has a pro-Russian opposition party a year or less away from winning elections against an unpopular incumbent government.

The gun America is pointing at Russia today could turn around to point right back at it overnight.


Image


Of course no one would like to be US ally when they are not offering anything good :)

Image
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby mrswdk on Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:47 pm

subtleknifewield wrote:Frankly I'm surprised mrs. hasn't commented on this thread :P


Image

You called?
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby mrswdk on Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:47 pm

God damn, this thread is just some old man ranting about how America won World War 2. I'm out again.
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby jimboston on Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:26 pm

GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:26 am

jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby Bernie Sanders on Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:52 am

GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


...and one day Russia may respect it's neighbors, instead of invading them or trying to instigate troubles within them.

Image
Last edited by Bernie Sanders on Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby jimboston on Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:53 am

GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


I never said a Multipolar world was bad... nor did I say an Unipolar one was bad. I never commented on that.

I was simply saying that... OK if we are no longer in an Unipolar world, fine. The USA still has the single strongest army. That doesn't mean we can run roughshod over the world... as there are other Powers. The OP said USA wasn't the strongest country anymore.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5252
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:01 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


...and one day Russia may respect it's neighbors, instead of invading them or trying to instigate troubles within them.

Only those that respect the rights of their minorities, others will be overrun, tho you as a blood thirsty American should not tell what others should do ;)

jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


I never said a Multipolar world was bad... nor did I say an Unipolar one was bad. I never commented on that.

I was simply saying that... OK if we are no longer in an Unipolar world, fine. The USA still has the single strongest army. That doesn't mean we can run roughshod over the world... as there are other Powers. The OP said USA wasn't the strongest country anymore.

USA doesn't have the strongest army in the world... although it spends much more then the others.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby Bernie Sanders on Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:30 pm

GoranZ wrote:
Bernie Sanders wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


...and one day Russia may respect it's neighbors, instead of invading them or trying to instigate troubles within them.

Only those that respect the rights of their minorities, others will be overrun, tho you as a blood thirsty American should not tell what others should do ;)

jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


I never said a Multipolar world was bad... nor did I say an Unipolar one was bad. I never commented on that.

I was simply saying that... OK if we are no longer in an Unipolar world, fine. The USA still has the single strongest army. That doesn't mean we can run roughshod over the world... as there are other Powers. The OP said USA wasn't the strongest country anymore.

USA doesn't have the strongest army in the world... although it spends much more then the others.


More NONSENSE from Saxi and his kid brother Goran

http://www.wonderslist.com/10-countries-with-strongest-armies/

You have to be a complete idiot or just uneducated to believe any country's military is more powerful than America.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Lavrov: Unipolar World No Longer Exists

Postby GoranZ on Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:52 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
Bernie Sanders wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


...and one day Russia may respect it's neighbors, instead of invading them or trying to instigate troubles within them.

Only those that respect the rights of their minorities, others will be overrun, tho you as a blood thirsty American should not tell what others should do ;)

jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
jimboston wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Lavrov with clear message to US: I know it will hurt, but you are not the strongest in the world


Assuming you are right, and it's no longer a "Unipolar World"... that does not mean the US isn't still the "strongest" nation.

It just means that we can't dominate the World. We can still be the strongest.

Wrong... Having multiple world powers could mean 2 things(depending on their leadership)
1. Peaceful World: Various conflicts are resolved by respect of mutual interests of the mutual world powers
2. Wars Thorn World: Various conflicts are resolved by force, and depending on the situation one world force will overcome the other(s) in one part of the world and opposite for the other part of the world. Hint: Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, etc...

Generally Multi polar world could be a good thing, more voices will be heard and good solutions will come as result of that, but only if World Powers respect each other, so I would prefer option 1, but that's not up to me.


I never said a Multipolar world was bad... nor did I say an Unipolar one was bad. I never commented on that.

I was simply saying that... OK if we are no longer in an Unipolar world, fine. The USA still has the single strongest army. That doesn't mean we can run roughshod over the world... as there are other Powers. The OP said USA wasn't the strongest country anymore.

USA doesn't have the strongest army in the world... although it spends much more then the others.


More NONSENSE from Saxi and his kid brother Goran

http://www.wonderslist.com/10-countries-with-strongest-armies/

You have to be a complete idiot or just uneducated to believe any country's military is more powerful than America.

Its not what you have, but how you use it... And Russians use what they have much more efficiently then US ;)
But you need to be smart man to understand that... And you are not smart, you are dumb as mule :lol:

Hard Nut to Crack: US Geostrategists Incapable to Outperform Putin
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
Brigadier GoranZ
 
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Next

Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users