Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
waauw wrote:Ugh, I don't like Joe Abercrombie. I've only read the First Law trilogy, but I find him too much of a try-hard. He tries to come over as a great writer, but really I find his writing kind of sloppy compared to other popular writers. He made me think of a cheap YA-writer. The ending of the series was truthfully horrible. He needlessly dragged on for 80-ish pages what could've been done in 20, making it seem like the book had a double ending. There was really no purpose to it. It didn't feel like a climax, more like worldbuilding for the sake of worldbuilding rather than the actual storyline.
thegreekdog wrote:waauw wrote:Ugh, I don't like Joe Abercrombie. I've only read the First Law trilogy, but I find him too much of a try-hard. He tries to come over as a great writer, but really I find his writing kind of sloppy compared to other popular writers. He made me think of a cheap YA-writer. The ending of the series was truthfully horrible. He needlessly dragged on for 80-ish pages what could've been done in 20, making it seem like the book had a double ending. There was really no purpose to it. It didn't feel like a climax, more like worldbuilding for the sake of worldbuilding rather than the actual storyline.
Interesting... I had a completely different response to the end of the First Law (other than that I thought the entire trilogy was too long). I liked his other books better. He wrote books kind of like Mel Gibson's war movie trilogy: Braveheart, Braveheart II (the American Revolution), and Braveheart III (the Vietnam War). Abercrombie wrote his fantasy trilogy, his war novel (The Heroes), his revenge novel (Best Served Cold) and his western (Red Country).
In any event, Abercrombie gets compared to Martin sometimes... I like him WAY more than Martin. He's a better writer and more creative.
Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:waauw wrote:Ugh, I don't like Joe Abercrombie. I've only read the First Law trilogy, but I find him too much of a try-hard. He tries to come over as a great writer, but really I find his writing kind of sloppy compared to other popular writers. He made me think of a cheap YA-writer. The ending of the series was truthfully horrible. He needlessly dragged on for 80-ish pages what could've been done in 20, making it seem like the book had a double ending. There was really no purpose to it. It didn't feel like a climax, more like worldbuilding for the sake of worldbuilding rather than the actual storyline.
Interesting... I had a completely different response to the end of the First Law (other than that I thought the entire trilogy was too long). I liked his other books better. He wrote books kind of like Mel Gibson's war movie trilogy: Braveheart, Braveheart II (the American Revolution), and Braveheart III (the Vietnam War). Abercrombie wrote his fantasy trilogy, his war novel (The Heroes), his revenge novel (Best Served Cold) and his western (Red Country).
In any event, Abercrombie gets compared to Martin sometimes... I like him WAY more than Martin. He's a better writer and more creative.
I kind of thought that with the First Law books, the length was part of the point. It was deliberately parodying fantasy books and demolishing expectations. Especially the idea of some great wizard led quest.
waauw wrote:Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:waauw wrote:Ugh, I don't like Joe Abercrombie. I've only read the First Law trilogy, but I find him too much of a try-hard. He tries to come over as a great writer, but really I find his writing kind of sloppy compared to other popular writers. He made me think of a cheap YA-writer. The ending of the series was truthfully horrible. He needlessly dragged on for 80-ish pages what could've been done in 20, making it seem like the book had a double ending. There was really no purpose to it. It didn't feel like a climax, more like worldbuilding for the sake of worldbuilding rather than the actual storyline.
Interesting... I had a completely different response to the end of the First Law (other than that I thought the entire trilogy was too long). I liked his other books better. He wrote books kind of like Mel Gibson's war movie trilogy: Braveheart, Braveheart II (the American Revolution), and Braveheart III (the Vietnam War). Abercrombie wrote his fantasy trilogy, his war novel (The Heroes), his revenge novel (Best Served Cold) and his western (Red Country).
In any event, Abercrombie gets compared to Martin sometimes... I like him WAY more than Martin. He's a better writer and more creative.
I kind of thought that with the First Law books, the length was part of the point. It was deliberately parodying fantasy books and demolishing expectations. Especially the idea of some great wizard led quest.
Well I guess I see your point. Didn't think of it that way. Now that I think about it, Tolkien did just that in the Lord of the Rings, leading a group of fella's on a quest and then endlessly dragging on after the final battle. I guess I'm just not into the dark gritty stuff.
Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:waauw wrote:Ugh, I don't like Joe Abercrombie. I've only read the First Law trilogy, but I find him too much of a try-hard. He tries to come over as a great writer, but really I find his writing kind of sloppy compared to other popular writers. He made me think of a cheap YA-writer. The ending of the series was truthfully horrible. He needlessly dragged on for 80-ish pages what could've been done in 20, making it seem like the book had a double ending. There was really no purpose to it. It didn't feel like a climax, more like worldbuilding for the sake of worldbuilding rather than the actual storyline.
Interesting... I had a completely different response to the end of the First Law (other than that I thought the entire trilogy was too long). I liked his other books better. He wrote books kind of like Mel Gibson's war movie trilogy: Braveheart, Braveheart II (the American Revolution), and Braveheart III (the Vietnam War). Abercrombie wrote his fantasy trilogy, his war novel (The Heroes), his revenge novel (Best Served Cold) and his western (Red Country).
In any event, Abercrombie gets compared to Martin sometimes... I like him WAY more than Martin. He's a better writer and more creative.
I kind of thought that with the First Law books, the length was part of the point. It was deliberately parodying fantasy books and demolishing expectations. Especially the idea of some great wizard led quest.
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:waauw wrote:Ugh, I don't like Joe Abercrombie. I've only read the First Law trilogy, but I find him too much of a try-hard. He tries to come over as a great writer, but really I find his writing kind of sloppy compared to other popular writers. He made me think of a cheap YA-writer. The ending of the series was truthfully horrible. He needlessly dragged on for 80-ish pages what could've been done in 20, making it seem like the book had a double ending. There was really no purpose to it. It didn't feel like a climax, more like worldbuilding for the sake of worldbuilding rather than the actual storyline.
Interesting... I had a completely different response to the end of the First Law (other than that I thought the entire trilogy was too long). I liked his other books better. He wrote books kind of like Mel Gibson's war movie trilogy: Braveheart, Braveheart II (the American Revolution), and Braveheart III (the Vietnam War). Abercrombie wrote his fantasy trilogy, his war novel (The Heroes), his revenge novel (Best Served Cold) and his western (Red Country).
In any event, Abercrombie gets compared to Martin sometimes... I like him WAY more than Martin. He's a better writer and more creative.
I kind of thought that with the First Law books, the length was part of the point. It was deliberately parodying fantasy books and demolishing expectations. Especially the idea of some great wizard led quest.
The kind, wizened wizard
The brave, noble knight
The stupid, violent barbarian
I don't know which I liked the best (Best Served Cold or The Heroes).
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:Are we posting or bitching? I must be on everyones' ignore list.....
I've read 5 books in the last 4 days.....anyone else?
KoolBak wrote:Are we posting or bitching? I must be on everyones' ignore list.....
I've read 5 books in the last 4 days.....anyone else?
Symmetry wrote:I'm just gonna necrobump this one as I've been plowing my way through my library's SF and Fantasy section for a while, and not enjoyed anything overmuch for a while.
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline.
Great nerd book, especially if you grew up in the 80's. Plus it's a standalone book, so no need to wait for book 2.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:I'm just gonna necrobump this one as I've been plowing my way through my library's SF and Fantasy section for a while, and not enjoyed anything overmuch for a while.
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline.
Great nerd book, especially if you grew up in the 80's. Plus it's a standalone book, so no need to wait for book 2.
I think you would like N.K. Jemisin.
I'm reading Brandon Sanderson's Stormlight Archive. He's pretty ponderous, but the books seem okay. And I like what he did with Wheel of Time. The last book was fantastic.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I bet Sanderson will end up finishing asoiaf once Martin dies.
-TG
jonesthecurl wrote:There's that Jonesey guy. I hear his book's worth reading.
tzor wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:There's that Jonesey guy. I hear his book's worth reading.
I've heard of him. I have it on my phone and it looks like I might have time this month to actually read it.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee