Page 1 of 5

flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 6:12 am
by Serbia
The mission statement from the Flat Earth Society:

Aim: To carefully observe, think freely rediscover forgotten fact and oppose theoretical dogmatic assumptions. To help establish the United States...of the world on this flat earth. Replace the science religion...with SANITY

The International Flat Earth Society is the oldest continuous Society existing on the world today. It began with the Creation of the Creation. First the water...the face of the deep...without form or limits...just Water. Then the Land sitting in and on the Water, the Water then as now being flat and level, as is the very Nature of Water. There are, of course, mountains and valleys on the Land but since most of the World is Water, we say, "The World is Flat". Historical accounts and spoken history tell us the Land part may have been square, all in one mass at one time, then as now, the magnetic north being the Center. Vast cataclysmic events and shaking no doubt broke the land apart, divided the Land to be our present continents or islands as they exist today. One thing we know for sure about this world...the known inhabited world is Flat, Level, a Plain World.

We maintain that what is called 'Science' today and 'scientists' consist of the same old gang of witch doctors, sorcerers, tellers of tales, the 'Priest-Entertainers' for the common people. 'Science' consists of a weird, way-out occult concoction of gibberish theory-theology...unrelated to the real world of facts, technology and inventions, tall buildings and fast cars, airplanes and other Real and Good things in life; technology is not in any way related to the web of idiotic scientific theory. ALL inventors have been anti-science. The Wright brothers said: "Science theory held us up for years. When we threw out all science, started from experiment and experience, then we invented the airplane." By the way, airplanes all fly level on this Plane earth.


Look out of your window! It's flat! So you can take your 'facts' and your 'science' and your 'overwhelming consensus' and shove 'em! I know what my won eyes, and the bible, tell me...

Job 38:13-14 "Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to know his place; that it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?

Matthew 4:8 "The devil took him to a very high mountain and displayed before him all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence..."

Deuteronomy 13:7 - 'from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth'

There is NO PROOF that the earth is round, and anyone who asserts otherwise is a communist and very possibly unpatriotic.

this post brought to you by the lame passive-aggressive dept

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 8:34 am
by ConfederateSS
---------Screw Science.......It killed the man on the moon/moon is made of green cheese. If a kid is walking along the top of a fence. The kid only falls. When the kid learns of gravity. Science has taken away the only American found planet. PLUTO.....Pluto will always be a planet here in America. Screw you science bastards....LONG LIVE PLANET PLUTO "GATEWAY TO THE UNIVERSE". LONG LIVE OUR FREEDOM OF IMAGINATION THAT LIVES IN OUR HEARTS...That science tries to steal from us. Through mumbo jumbo... :D ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion). :D 8-)

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 9:03 am
by tzor
The concept of a spherical Earth dates back to around the 6th century BC, when it was mentioned in ancient Greek philosophy, but remained a matter of philosophical speculation until the 3rd century BC, when Hellenistic astronomy established the spherical shape of the earth as a physical given.


Historian Jeffrey Burton Russell says the flat-Earth error flourished most between 1870 and 1920, and had to do with the ideological setting created by struggles over evolution. Russell claims "with extraordinary few exceptions no educated person in the history of Western Civilization from the third century B.C. onward believed that the Earth was flat", and ascribes popularization of the flat-Earth myth to histories by John William Draper, Andrew Dickson White, and Washington Irving.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 11:07 am
by jonesthecurl
Where's the south pole?

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 11:44 am
by Serbia
I have a cousin who believes very strongly in a flat earth. The "south pole" is simply the edge of the earth, which explains why the actual "south pole" has been declared off limits by the governments of the world.

My cousin is a man in his fifties. He's at least a high school grad, not sure if he went to college, but just a regular guy. His belief is very much rooted in religion as well. There are tons of youtube videos out there on this subject, which is where he gets all his evidence and "proof". It's madness. It's impossible to have a conversation with him on this, because it's a faith-based issue for him. The science is meaningless to him unless it supports his theory, and if it doesn't, it's a conspiracy.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 12:29 pm
by jonesthecurl
Why is it night in one place when it's day in another?
It intrigues me how Flat Earthers explain things like seasons, time zones, and so on. And what about the other planets - do they think they're flat too?

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 4:16 pm
by Serbia
Other planets do not matter in their worldview, at least for some, or more specifically, those who are like my cousin. His beliefs are based off a literal interpretation of the bible, and backed up by verses. God set the earth upon it's foundations, so that it cannot be moved - proof that the earth is flat! And that the sun and moon rotate around the earth! Other heavenly bodies matter not, for they are not written about, and we're the center of the universe anyway, because of course we are, BIBLE SAYS SO!

It's maddening, yet perversely interesting. A part of me wants to know how their minds work. I've watched some of the craziness that he's posted, as long as they come in 5 or 10 minute clips. The hour long marathon nonsense that he'll post I don't have time for.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:30 am
by hotfire
I guess the Coriolis effect is a lie and low pressure cells should rotate the same direction in both hemispheres then along with any gyres

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 1:16 am
by Phatscotty



Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:51 am
by betiko
hey f*ck you I did a thread like this a few years ago, you could ve at least necrobumped it.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:05 am
by Serbia
betiko wrote:hey f*ck you I did a thread like this a few years ago, you could ve at least necrobumped it.


Wouldn't be old enough for my tastes.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:07 am
by Dukasaur
betiko wrote:hey f*ck you I did a thread like this a few years ago, you could ve at least necrobumped it.

You can't hold a candle to Universalcreepo in this area.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:23 am
by /
Image
I'm willing to kickstart an intercontinental plane trip directly over Antartica just because this amount of stupidity should not be allowed to exist.
Stretch goal: Send Flat-Earthers to space.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:34 pm
by Serbia
What you don't understand is that for some people, my cousin included, their belief is rooted in religion. He'll come up with something to say that you didn't fly over the pole, because it doesn't exist, and point out that the plane if always flying level and never adjusting altitude to compensate for the curvature of the earth, and on and on. He believes in this because of the bible, and no amount of evidence will convince him otherwise, unless you can find several biblical verses stating that the earth is in fact round.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:23 pm
by jonesthecurl
I think the most obvious question is why is it day on part of the Earth when it's night in another?

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:52 pm
by waauw
jonesthecurl wrote:I think the most obvious question is why is it day on part of the Earth when it's night in another?


Greek budget cuts torment Mount Olympus. Nyx's veil of darkness is too small to cover the entire earth.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:56 pm
by Serbia
jonesthecurl wrote:I think the most obvious question is why is it day on part of the Earth when it's night in another?


They've got an answer for that.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:17 pm
by jonesthecurl
Wondeful. "The Sun acts like a flashlight pointing down".
I particularly like this bit:
the force known as gravity doesn't exist

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:39 pm
by warmonger1981
That's the most ridiculous shit I seen. I've heard of some wild conspiracy shit but that takes the cake. Those are some stupid answers.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:44 pm
by tzor
Serbia wrote:What you don't understand is that for some people, my cousin included, their belief is rooted in religion.


No it is not. It is based on ignorance, and stubbornness. They just cloak this under the name of "religion." They have about as much knowledge of the "religion" they profess as they do "science."

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:57 pm
by Serbia
:twisted:
tzor wrote:
Serbia wrote: :twisted: What you don't understand is that for some people, my cousin included, their belief is rooted in religion. :twisted:


No it is not. It is based on ignorance, and stubbornness. They just cloak this under the name of "religion." They have about as much knowledge of the "religion" they profess as they do "science."


:twisted: Exactly. :twisted: Rooted in religion. :twisted: If you're going to disagree with me, try to actually say something that disproves my point. :twisted:

:twisted:

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:40 pm
by /
https://wiki.tfes.org/Sunset

This is honestly one of the most baffling things I've ever read. Apparently something that's actully over your head will look like it's lowering as it gets further because of some sort of optical illusion? I actually feel stupid because it makes so little sense I don't know how to begin to argue against it. Can someone please explain what this is trying to tell me?

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 5:52 pm
by hotfire
/ wrote:https://wiki.tfes.org/Sunset

This is honestly one of the most baffling things I've ever read. Apparently something that's actully over your head will look like it's lowering as it gets further because of some sort of optical illusion? I actually feel stupid because it makes so little sense I don't know how to begin to argue against it. Can someone please explain what this is trying to tell me?


that's hilarious...it appears to use the Earth's curvature as evidence that the Earth isn't curved

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 7:20 pm
by jonesthecurl
It's flat-out crazy.

Re: flat earth vs ""'science'""

PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 9:42 pm
by Serbia
jonesthecurl wrote:It's flat-out crazy.


I like what you did there.