Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:o there we have mister libtard that doesn't want to see a man hitting women
The Biden administration has withdrawn government support for a federal lawsuit in Connecticut that seeks to ban transgender athletes from participating in girls’ high school sports. Connecticut allows high school athletes to compete in sports according to their gender identity. The lawsuit was filed a year ago by several female runners who argue they have been deprived of wins, state titles and athletic opportunities by being forced to compete against two transgender sprinters scientifically-described men who falsely claim to be women.
The Justice Department and the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights withdrew their support for the case ahead of a hearing scheduled for Friday on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
The Trump administration’s intervention in the case last year came as state legislatures around the country debated restricting transgender athletes’ participation to their gender assigned at birth.
https://www.wave3.com/2021/02/26/biden- ... lete-case/
mookiemcgee wrote:I'm against the libs on this one, transgendered people either need their own sports leagues. Totally wrong allowing a person who lived the first 20 years of their life juicing their bods up on testosterone to suddenly start competing against women after gender re-assignment.
Scientific papers have clearly shown that those who have undergone male puberty retain significant advantages in power and strength, even after taking medication to suppress their testosterone levels.
As one study published last year highlighted, scientists found that the male performance advantage in weightlifting was 30 percent when compared to women. Yet crucially, even when transgender women suppressed testosterone for 12 months, the loss of lean body mass, muscle area and strength was only around 5 percent. In other words, even after reducing testosterone, trans women retain most of their strength and power.
Why, then, with all this evidence that shows how unfair it is, do the likes of the Olympic Committee allow natal males to compete against females? Two words: fear and capitulation. Any descent from the ‘trans women are women’ mantra earns you an accusation of bigotry.
In 2019, tennis champion and lesbian icon Martina Navratilova was dropped from the advisory board and as an ambassador of of US-based Athlete Ally, which supports LGBT sportspeople and which Navratilova helped set up. The 18-time Grand Slam winner was deemed to be ‘transphobic’. Her crime? Navratilova wrote in the Sunday Times of London that it was ‘insane’ that transgender athletes who ‘decide’ to become female had achieved honors ‘that were beyond their capabilities as men’.
Navratilova came out as a lesbian in 1981 and bravely stood firm against the slings and arrows from bigots and misogynists in the tennis world and beyond. But her good work and courage stands for nothing as far as the trans Taliban is concerned.
https://www.spectatorworld.com/life/lau ... ports/amp/
The ram wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:I'm against the libs on this one, transgendered people either need their own sports leagues. Totally wrong allowing a person who lived the first 20 years of their life juicing their bods up on testosterone to suddenly start competing against women after gender re-assignment.
That's wrongthink. Next you will be donning a swastika and announcing that Islam is actually ultra conservative and can't possibly be heralded by the left as one of their beloved minorities.
mookiemcgee wrote:The ram wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:I'm against the libs on this one, transgendered people either need their own sports leagues. Totally wrong allowing a person who lived the first 20 years of their life juicing their bods up on testosterone to suddenly start competing against women after gender re-assignment.
That's wrongthink. Next you will be donning a swastika and announcing that Islam is actually ultra conservative and can't possibly be heralded by the left as one of their beloved minorities.
No, there's actual room in the middle. I'm somewhere between saying all people are the same in spite of physiological difference between them, and murdering my own son because he's gay.
jonesthecurl wrote:I'm to the left of most people on most subjects. This, however, needs to be sorted. It's not prejudice to point out that a physically male person has physical advantages in some sports, even if they've decided they're female.
Biden Harris Lawsuit wrote:To be sure, there remain significant barriers to providing full equity in athletics for female students,” the Justice Department said in its filing. But permitting participation by transgender girls ... “is not one of them.”
https://www.timesleaderonline.com/sport ... lates-law/
5,000 miles away, Cardiff University activists wrote:Feminism is entirely necessary in the modern day, as women still face a myriad of issues - but trans liberation is not one of them.
Advocates and students gathered in Helena Monday to protest against a bill that would put limits on transgender athletes in school sports. About 30 people attended the protest against House Bill 112.
https://www.kpax.com/news/montana-legis ... r-athletes
saxitoxin wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:The ram wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:I'm against the libs on this one, transgendered people either need their own sports leagues. Totally wrong allowing a person who lived the first 20 years of their life juicing their bods up on testosterone to suddenly start competing against women after gender re-assignment.
That's wrongthink. Next you will be donning a swastika and announcing that Islam is actually ultra conservative and can't possibly be heralded by the left as one of their beloved minorities.
No, there's actual room in the middle. I'm somewhere between saying all people are the same in spite of physiological difference between them, and murdering my own son because he's gay.
Then you're a right-wing extremist and a transphobe bigot.
mookiemcgee wrote:But I'm also a communist/socialist antifa religion bashing leftist since I don't support murdering my own children over their sexual preferences. That's life in the middle i guess!
jonesthecurl wrote:I'm to the left of most people on most subjects. This, however, needs to be sorted. It's not prejudice to point out that a physically male person has physical advantages in some sports, even if they've decided they're female.
mookiemcgee wrote:saxitoxin wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:The ram wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:I'm against the libs on this one, transgendered people either need their own sports leagues. Totally wrong allowing a person who lived the first 20 years of their life juicing their bods up on testosterone to suddenly start competing against women after gender re-assignment.
That's wrongthink. Next you will be donning a swastika and announcing that Islam is actually ultra conservative and can't possibly be heralded by the left as one of their beloved minorities.
No, there's actual room in the middle. I'm somewhere between saying all people are the same in spite of physiological difference between them, and murdering my own son because he's gay.
Then you're a right-wing extremist and a transphobe bigot.
But I'm also a communist/socialist antifa religion bashing leftist since I don't support murdering my own children over their sexual preferences. That's life in the middle i guess!
jonesthecurl wrote:I'm to the left of most people on most subjects. This, however, needs to be sorted. It's not prejudice to point out that a physically male person has physical advantages in some sports, even if they've decided they're female.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users