Moderator: Community Team
tjm123 wrote:radaition kills you slowy anti matter kills you then. with out the whole painful radition death thing. chose one
Neutrino wrote:But what would be the point of firing a anti-matter missile against a crappy little ship?
There is essentially no likelyhood in the near future of developing anything better than Fusion engines.
The cost of the missile would probably outweigh that of the ship you are destroying!
It's not the most ecomomical way to make war.
tjm123 wrote:then i would buy blast shields and a backup genater for my anti matter.
Aegnor wrote:Well I think that anti-matter weapons could benefit mankind. I'm sure it's more capable of removing asteroid threats than fission weapons.
Neutrino wrote:Aegnor wrote:Well I think that anti-matter weapons could benefit mankind. I'm sure it's more capable of removing asteroid threats than fission weapons.
True, but you'd still have the problem of smaller asteroid chunks, unless you used a lot of Anti-matter...
Aegnor wrote:Neutrino wrote:Aegnor wrote:Well I think that anti-matter weapons could benefit mankind. I'm sure it's more capable of removing asteroid threats than fission weapons.
True, but you'd still have the problem of smaller asteroid chunks, unless you used a lot of Anti-matter...
Hehe true. But who knows, some day we might find anti-matter in nature somewhere.
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I don't think the human race will die unless everything else in the universe is destroyed or rendered useless, in a big rip, big crunch or big freeze scenario. We're built to survive. In fact, even if all the nuclear weapons on Earth were detonated we would still survive (They aren't as powerful as you think.). There is no way to kill all humans except for taking away all our resources.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I don't think the human race will die unless everything else in the universe is destroyed or rendered useless, in a big rip, big crunch or big freeze scenario. We're built to survive. In fact, even if all the nuclear weapons on Earth were detonated we would still survive (They aren't as powerful as you think.). There is no way to kill all humans except for taking away all our resources.
Neutrino wrote:EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I don't think the human race will die unless everything else in the universe is destroyed or rendered useless, in a big rip, big crunch or big freeze scenario. We're built to survive. In fact, even if all the nuclear weapons on Earth were detonated we would still survive (They aren't as powerful as you think.). There is no way to kill all humans except for taking away all our resources.
If they were all detonated in one spot, then no-one would care much (except those living nearby ) but if it was a war situation and they were all detonated over various population centres, then the impact would be much worse.
Probably a majority of the population would die immidiatly and the rest either rendered sterile, killed slowly by radiation poisioning or produce offspring that bare little to no resemblance to the human norm.
Those that survive the radiation and such will probably die as the ecosystem goes kaput.
Even if some form of humanity does survive the nuclear winter, the present civilization has used up most of the accessable resources, so it will be unlikely they will ever reach the technalogical ehights of today.
The moral of the story?
Nuclear weapons are bad.
Pico wrote:How about rocket launchers that fire chainsaws?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Anarchy Ninja wrote:Neutrino wrote:EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I don't think the human race will die unless everything else in the universe is destroyed or rendered useless, in a big rip, big crunch or big freeze scenario. We're built to survive. In fact, even if all the nuclear weapons on Earth were detonated we would still survive (They aren't as powerful as you think.). There is no way to kill all humans except for taking away all our resources.
If they were all detonated in one spot, then no-one would care much (except those living nearby ) but if it was a war situation and they were all detonated over various population centres, then the impact would be much worse.
Probably a majority of the population would die immidiatly and the rest either rendered sterile, killed slowly by radiation poisioning or produce offspring that bare little to no resemblance to the human norm.
Those that survive the radiation and such will probably die as the ecosystem goes kaput.
Even if some form of humanity does survive the nuclear winter, the present civilization has used up most of the accessable resources, so it will be unlikely they will ever reach the technalogical ehights of today.
The moral of the story?
Nuclear weapons are bad.
I'm all for it as long as my irradiated mutant horrible offspring have some kind of amazing powers
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Of course we'd be in a horrible spot if all the nuclear weapons on earth were detonated. But we'd still survive. Let's take a step by step look at it, shall we?Neutrino wrote:EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I don't think the human race will die unless everything else in the universe is destroyed or rendered useless, in a big rip, big crunch or big freeze scenario. We're built to survive. In fact, even if all the nuclear weapons on Earth were detonated we would still survive (They aren't as powerful as you think.). There is no way to kill all humans except for taking away all our resources.
If they were all detonated in one spot, then no-one would care much (except those living nearby ) but if it was a war situation and they were all detonated over various population centres, then the impact would be much worse.
Probably a majority of the population would die immidiatly and the rest either rendered sterile, killed slowly by radiation poisioning or produce offspring that bare little to no resemblance to the human norm.
Those that survive the radiation and such will probably die as the ecosystem goes kaput.
Even if some form of humanity does survive the nuclear winter, the present civilization has used up most of the accessable resources, so it will be unlikely they will ever reach the technalogical ehights of today.
The moral of the story?
Nuclear weapons are bad.
Skittles! wrote:Anarchy Ninja wrote:Neutrino wrote:EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I don't think the human race will die unless everything else in the universe is destroyed or rendered useless, in a big rip, big crunch or big freeze scenario. We're built to survive. In fact, even if all the nuclear weapons on Earth were detonated we would still survive (They aren't as powerful as you think.). There is no way to kill all humans except for taking away all our resources.
If they were all detonated in one spot, then no-one would care much (except those living nearby ) but if it was a war situation and they were all detonated over various population centres, then the impact would be much worse.
Probably a majority of the population would die immidiatly and the rest either rendered sterile, killed slowly by radiation poisioning or produce offspring that bare little to no resemblance to the human norm.
Those that survive the radiation and such will probably die as the ecosystem goes kaput.
Even if some form of humanity does survive the nuclear winter, the present civilization has used up most of the accessable resources, so it will be unlikely they will ever reach the technalogical ehights of today.
The moral of the story?
Nuclear weapons are bad.
I'm all for it as long as my irradiated mutant horrible offspring have some kind of amazing powers
Do you count 'amazing powers' as mangled limbs and mental unstability?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Neutrino wrote:Aegnor wrote:Neutrino wrote:Aegnor wrote:Well I think that anti-matter weapons could benefit mankind. I'm sure it's more capable of removing asteroid threats than fission weapons.
True, but you'd still have the problem of smaller asteroid chunks, unless you used a lot of Anti-matter...
Hehe true. But who knows, some day we might find anti-matter in nature somewhere.
Hmmm, well it'll have to be somewhere with an extrordinarilary pure vacuum, because anti-matter tends to react explosively with normal matter...
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users