Page 1 of 2

College Football

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:44 am
by CBlake
Arkansas Razorbacks 46, Troy Trojans 26

McFadden: passing- 1/1 42 yards 1 TD
rushing - 24- 151 yards 1TD
receiving- 2- 30 yards
Jones: Rushing- 12- 129 yards 1 TD
Receiving- 1- 14 yards
Kick return- 3 - 144 yards 1TD
A. Tejada- 4/4 field goals

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:07 pm
by CBlake
bump

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:10 pm
by misterman10
CBlake wrote:bump

f*ck YOU

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:47 pm
by CBlake
woo pig sooie

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:01 pm
by CBlake
!!!!

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:02 pm
by misterman10
CBlake wrote:!!!!

your an idiot and deserve to die
theres a reason nobody wants to post in this thread :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:04 pm
by CBlake
misterman10 wrote:
CBlake wrote:!!!!

your an idiot and deserve to die
theres a reason nobody wants to post in this thread :roll:


shut up ho arkansas is the shit

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:05 pm
by misterman10
CBlake wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
CBlake wrote:!!!!

your an idiot and deserve to die
theres a reason nobody wants to post in this thread :roll:


shut up ho arkansas is the shit


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
im sure you love dick

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:08 pm
by GreecePwns
And college football sucks. There's only one game a week worth watching. The ranking system makes no sense. In college football, 3 teams go undefeated but since one doesn't have a hard schedule, they can't win the championship? I mean, they didn't choose that. Explain please.

[/minirant]

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:09 pm
by misterman10
GreecePwns wrote:And college football sucks. There's only one game a week worth watching. The ranking system makes no sense. In college football, 3 teams go undefeated but since one doesn't have a hard schedule, they can't win the championship? I mean, they didn't choose that. Explain please.

thats why I want to see a playoffs, because their BCS standings are bullshit

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:16 pm
by GreecePwns
misterman10 wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:And college football sucks. There's only one game a week worth watching. The ranking system makes no sense. In college football, 3 teams go undefeated but since one doesn't have a hard schedule, they can't win the championship? I mean, they didn't choose that. Explain please.

thats why I want to see a playoffs, because their BCS standings are bullshit
at least have the teams that are undefeated or have one loss and have a round robin between them, with the top record winning. if there is a tie, those teams play eachother. if 3 or more are tied, then the round robin continues with those teams only. i mean, there are only about 12 weeks the way it is right now. is it that hard?

if they suppossedly are undefeated b/c of their schedule, at least have them prove their worth

[/minirant part 2]

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:16 pm
by misterman10
GreecePwns wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:And college football sucks. There's only one game a week worth watching. The ranking system makes no sense. In college football, 3 teams go undefeated but since one doesn't have a hard schedule, they can't win the championship? I mean, they didn't choose that. Explain please.

thats why I want to see a playoffs, because their BCS standings are bullshit
at least have the teams that are undefeated or have one loss and have a round robin between them, with the top record winning. if there is a tie, those teams play eachother. if 3 or more are tied, then the round robin continues with those teams only. i mean, there are only about 12 weeks the way it is right now. is it that hard?


like Boise State :wink:
although I don't think boise state was better than florida or ohio state

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:20 pm
by johnnyrotten
46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:22 pm
by GreecePwns
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:23 pm
by johnnyrotten
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:24 pm
by misterman10
johnnyrotten wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

or maybe there were midget goalies and midget defenders

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:26 pm
by johnnyrotten
misterman10 wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

or maybe there were midget goalies and midget defenders

Another fair point; if they had good defenders, they would have had to shoot from long range all the time, which even against midget keepers can be tricky at times.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:27 pm
by GreecePwns
misterman10 wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

or maybe there were midget goalies and midget defenders
there must have been a midget sized field, because there was no way a team gets off at least 46 shots on a normal sized field.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:28 pm
by misterman10
GreecePwns wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

or maybe there were midget goalies and midget defenders
there must have been a midget sized field, because there was no way a team gets off at least 46 shots on a normal sized field.

maybe there were midget refs too, who couldnt see what was going on so they just gave out lots of goals

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:29 pm
by johnnyrotten
misterman10 wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

or maybe there were midget goalies and midget defenders
there must have been a midget sized field, because there was no way a team gets off at least 46 shots on a normal sized field.

maybe there were midget refs too, who couldnt see what was going on so they just gave out lots of goals

Or just blind refs.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:37 pm
by GreecePwns
johnnyrotten wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:
GreecePwns wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:46-26? That's a lot of goals for a football match.
lol. maybe there weren't goalies.

Or possibly midget goalies. Midget goalies suck ass.

or maybe there were midget goalies and midget defenders
there must have been a midget sized field, because there was no way a team gets off at least 46 shots on a normal sized field.

maybe there were midget refs too, who couldnt see what was going on so they just gave out lots of goals
Or just blind refs.
Maybe the coaches were mutes, so they couldn't tell their midget defences to get organized.

I also noticed that the OP hasn't responded. Victory for REAL football!
real football 1-0 fake football
Now that's a realistic score.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:40 pm
by CBlake
real football-- hooray for the NFL

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:41 pm
by GreecePwns
CBlake wrote:real football-- hooray for the NFL


No real football uses your feet more than 5% of the game.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:43 pm
by CBlake
who cares

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:44 pm
by johnnyrotten
CBlake wrote:who cares

Why do you bother responding then?