Conquer Club

Posted: **Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:51 pm**

What some Brits are doing to their speed cameras.

Speed Cameras
http://www.speedcam.co.uk/gatso2.htm

because of this

http://www.infowars.com/articles/bb/cam ... _limit.htm

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:55 am**

20 mph!? I can ride a bike that fast!

maybe it is illegal to destroy cameras but seems to me they have a god reason

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:24 am**

The speed cameras are not being destroyed because of a proposed plan for having an URBAN 20 mph speed limit, and also actually enforcing it.

They are being destroyed because a small group of extremely selfish and idiotic motorists seem to think the law does not apply to them.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:21 am**

More Speed - Let's kill people
More Guns - Let's Kill people
More Oil - Let's Kill the World

Thats the ' freedom ' Xtra is so proud of :cry:

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:27 am**

joecoolfrog wrote:More Speed - Let's kill people
More Guns - Let's Kill people
More Oil - Let's Kill the World

Thats the ' freedom ' Xtra is so proud of

Yeah. Great freedom xtra!

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:47 am**

im not a Brit, but i bet there sick and tired of their government using these speed cameras as money generators...

God love them, smash somemore

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:00 am**

Speed cameras and red-light cameras are not money generators. they're there for enforcement b/c people won't slow down or stop otherwise. I had to laugh at the article though that said fat people fall asleep at the wheel b/c f their sedentary lifestyle. I've never heard that tidbit before and highly doubt it's true.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:29 am**

xtratabasco wrote:im not a Brit, but i bet there sick and tired of their government using these speed cameras as money generators...

God love them, smash somemore

Well they shouldn't be BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW THEN!

For fucks sake. Your threads are usually ridiculous but this one takes the absolute biscuit. I'd have thought you, as the mass exposer of conspiracy theories, would have been sympathetic to the everyday plight of the hundreds of people A DAY who get killed by speeding motorists.

A small small minority of motorists who think that speed cameras should be destroyed are doing it because they don't like the fact that they are being punished for BREAKING THE LAWS IN THIS COUNTRY.

If you think our speed limit laws are unfair then thats an entirely different issue.

What should we be doing next, Xtra, killing cops because they arrest shoplifters? Surely thats curtailing our right to take whatever the f*ck we want from shops!

And believe me, the brits who smash speed cameras are in no way a little far-left revolutionary group who are fighting for the rights of the people. They are well-off people who can afford to buy the kind of car that one can enjoy breaking the speed limit in! Right wing daily mail readers the lot of them.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:46 am**

Hehe...2 newly erected speed camera's on the A27 going past Brighton have had big "builder bag's" put over the top of them...

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:50 am**

Guiscard wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:im not a Brit, but i bet there sick and tired of their government using these speed cameras as money generators...

God love them, smash somemore

Well they shouldn't be BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW THEN!

For fucks sake. Your threads are usually ridiculous but this one takes the absolute biscuit. I'd have thought you, as the mass exposer of conspiracy theories, would have been sympathetic to the everyday plight of the hundreds of people A DAY who get killed by speeding motorists.

A small small minority of motorists who think that speed cameras should be destroyed are doing it because they don't like the fact that they are being punished for BREAKING THE LAWS IN THIS COUNTRY.

If you think our speed limit laws are unfair then thats an entirely different issue.

What should we be doing next, Xtra, killing cops because they arrest shoplifters? Surely thats curtailing our right to take whatever the f*ck we want from shops!

And believe me, the brits who smash speed cameras are in no way a little far-left revolutionary group who are fighting for the rights of the people. They are well-off people who can afford to buy the kind of car that one can enjoy breaking the speed limit in! Right wing daily mail readers the lot of them.

this is bob-on(except for the swearing, as we are not aloud anymore in the clubhouse). if they don`t break the law, they don`t get fined or points on their license. it`s a simple as xtra. :roll:

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:01 am**

Norse wrote:Hehe...2 newly erected speed camera's on the A27 going past Brighton have had big "builder bag's" put over the top of them...

I wondered how long it would be before you showed up...

Don't worry, they have cameras in Oz too...

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:12 am**

Guiscard wrote:
Norse wrote:Hehe...2 newly erected speed camera's on the A27 going past Brighton have had big "builder bag's" put over the top of them...

I wondered how long it would be before you showed up...

Don't worry, they have cameras in Oz too...

WTF Guiscard?

Who's worrying about the price of cheese?

You have really got to stop presuming, because your not exactly the intuitive type are you? In fact, I would go as far as to say that 70-80% of what you splurt out is utter bollox, and mis-representation.

Get your facts right.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:12 am**

facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:15 am**

The1exile wrote:facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

You dickhead...

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:15 am**

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEWwuxDIos0

this is one being taken down too

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:17 am**

xtra, why is all your news about 10 weeks old

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:19 am**

Norse wrote:
The1exile wrote:facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

You dickhead...

Hardly much of a rebuke. I'm really interested in which facts Guiscard hasn't got straight.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:21 am**

The1exile wrote:
Norse wrote:
The1exile wrote:facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

You dickhead...

Hardly much of a rebuke. I'm really interested in which facts Guiscard hasn't got straight.

The1Exile, had you cared to actually read the posts that you are reffering to, then it will be plainly obvious that I was telling him to "get his facts right" about myself, instead of just presuming that I was dead-set against speed cameras.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:22 am**

Any more for nursery?

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:22 am**

The1exile wrote:
Norse wrote:
The1exile wrote:facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

You dickhead...

Hardly much of a rebuke. I'm really interested in which facts Guiscard hasn't got straight.

So am I!

Preceding a post about speed camera vandalism with 'hehe' would indicate to me that either a) you agree with it or b) you think its just a cheeky bit of fun. Was my assumption wrong?

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:26 am**

Guiscard wrote:
The1exile wrote:
Norse wrote:
The1exile wrote:facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

You dickhead...

Hardly much of a rebuke. I'm really interested in which facts Guiscard hasn't got straight.

So am I!

Preceding a post about speed camera vandalism with 'hehe' would indicate to me that either a) you agree with it or b) you think its just a cheeky bit of fun. Was my assumption wrong?

Assumptions assumptions assumptions!

Then again, I don't suppose you are particularly good at distinguishing facts, without a text-book and a charter in front of you.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:36 am**

Norse wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
The1exile wrote:
Norse wrote:
The1exile wrote:facts? What, you think they don't have camera's in oz?

You dickhead...

Hardly much of a rebuke. I'm really interested in which facts Guiscard hasn't got straight.

So am I!

Preceding a post about speed camera vandalism with 'hehe' would indicate to me that either a) you agree with it or b) you think its just a cheeky bit of fun. Was my assumption wrong?

Assumptions assumptions assumptions!

Then again, I don't suppose you are particularly good at distinguishing facts, without a text-book and a charter in front of you.

Norse, you know you are being hair-splittingly ridiculous here. We all know EXACTLY what your post implied. Who do you think you're either fooling or impressing here?

Either way, would you care to take your silly little charade a little further and actually contradict what I said?

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:00 am**

Guiscard wrote:

Norse, you know you are being hair-splittingly ridiculous here. We all know EXACTLY what your post implied. Who do you think you're either fooling or impressing here?

What exactly did my post imply?

See, the problem with people like you, is that you add 2 and 2, and get 5. We can all see that you are not particularly bright, but is this really an excuse for fooking everything up all the time?

I have met 7 year olds who have a higher level of cognitive ability than yourself.

Either way, would you care to take your silly little charade a little further and actually contradict what I said?

What in Poseidon's name are you talking about?

My sill y little charade? The only "silly little charade" I see here is your pathetic lack of intuition and common sense.

You, my friend, are a no-mark.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:04 am**

Guiscard wrote:Preceding a post about speed camera vandalism with 'hehe' would indicate to me that either a) you agree with it or b) you think its just a cheeky bit of fun.

Posted: **Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:06 am**

Guiscard wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Preceding a post about speed camera vandalism with 'hehe' would indicate to me that either a) you agree with it or b) you think its just a cheeky bit of fun.

Wrong!