Page 1 of 2
Rolling Stone's 100 Best Guitarists

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:45 pm
by jnd94
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ ... _all_time/
Well, I guess most of this is right, but there are a few key mistakes. Who can spot them?
I'll give you a clue for one. The duckwalk is in the 90's.


Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:48 pm
by Syzygy
Edit: I lied... I'm reading it now.
Rolling Stone can be full of shit sometimes. Some of the reviews they've given albums have been so far off the mark its unbelievable.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:50 pm
by d.gishman
Why the heck is Kurt Cobain #12? He beat other guitarists who are way better...

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:51 pm
by jnd94
What amazes me is the guy from Red Hot Chili Peppers beat out Eddie Van Halen.....

Re: Rolling Stone's 100 Best Guitarists

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:53 pm
by muy_thaiguy
jnd94 wrote:http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5937559/the_100_greatest_guitarists_of_all_time/
Well, I guess most of this is right, but there are a few key mistakes. Who can spot them?
I'll give you a clue for one. The duckwalk is in the 90's.

Angus Young!?

WHY!?

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:56 pm
by suggs
Well, thers no Johnny Marr so the list lacks any real credibility.
And Paul Weller?
Graham Coxon?
Plus, The Edge is in the list and the guy can barely play achord.
So, nope, the list is a joke.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:57 pm
by d.gishman
jnd94 wrote:What amazes me is the guy from Red Hot Chili Peppers beat out Eddie Van Halen.....

John Frusciante is awesome though. I am still shocked by Kurt Cobain.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:59 pm
by suggs
Cobain was a great songwriter. But nothing special as a guitarist.
Whereas, Van Halen couldnt write a decent song to save his life, but an awesome technical player.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:01 pm
by F1fth
Well, I never really liked the Rolling Stone at all. This has changed nothing. This is just a popularity contest.
And "of all time"? What about Niccolo Paganini then?


Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:02 pm
by Genghis Khan CA
Rolling Stone knows nothing about music? That's old news...

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:03 pm
by suggs
So, come on chaps?
Top ten/twenty?...

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:10 pm
by xtratabasco
this list is bs
that list is almost 5 years old, if that matters.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:12 pm
by Guiscard
xtratabasco wrote:this list is bs
Yeh I know... where the f*ck is Ron Paul?

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:13 pm
by jnd94
Guiscard wrote:xtratabasco wrote:this list is bs
Yeh I know... where the f*ck is Ron Paul?


Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:14 pm
by jnd94
xtratabasco wrote:this list is bs
that list is almost 5 years old, if that matters.
It doesn't becuase when you think about all of the shit bands that have popped up between 03' and now, there really wouldn't be any changes to the list.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:17 pm
by xtratabasco
jnd94 wrote:xtratabasco wrote:this list is bs
that list is almost 5 years old, if that matters.
It doesn't becuase when you think about all of the shit bands that have popped up between 03' and now, there really wouldn't be any changes to the list.
yeah, thats kind of my thinking too.
but some of them just dont make any sense.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:18 pm
by jnd94
xtratabasco wrote:jnd94 wrote:xtratabasco wrote:this list is bs
that list is almost 5 years old, if that matters.
It doesn't becuase when you think about all of the shit bands that have popped up between 03' and now, there really wouldn't be any changes to the list.
yeah, thats kind of my thinking too.
but some of them just dont make any sense.
Like Johnny Ramone at #16. The Ramones were not creative. They were good, but every guitarist from that era could do what he could do. Nothing special about him, and he makes the top 20.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:19 pm
by muy_thaiguy
jnd94 wrote:xtratabasco wrote:jnd94 wrote:xtratabasco wrote:this list is bs
that list is almost 5 years old, if that matters.
It doesn't becuase when you think about all of the shit bands that have popped up between 03' and now, there really wouldn't be any changes to the list.
yeah, thats kind of my thinking too.
but some of them just dont make any sense.
Like Johnny Ramone at #16. The Ramones were not creative. They were good, but every guitarist from that era could do what he could do. Nothing special about him, and he makes the top 20.
Yet Angus Young is all the way down at 95.


Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:21 pm
by jnd94
Exaclty. I shed a tear at that site. He is a fuckin amazing guitarist! I have a link to Thunderstruck, where the first part has a close up of Angus just doing the beginning. It's outta this world!


Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:21 pm
by xtratabasco
and Keith Richards number 10

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:30 pm
by muy_thaiguy
jnd94 wrote:Exaclty. I shed a tear at that site. He is a fuckin amazing guitarist! I have a link to Thunderstruck, where the first part has a close up of Angus just doing the beginning. It's outta this world!

I think I have that video saved on my youtube account.


Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:32 pm
by unriggable
Kurt cobain should not be that high. He's not a good guitarist.

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:51 pm
by xtratabasco
where is Alex Lifeson of Rush
and Randy Rhoads and Iommi way up in the high 80s
where is George Lynch and Don Dokken
where is April Wine
Where is the Detroit Rocker Ted Nugent
Where is Aerosmith
Where is Shanker of old Scorpions or new scorpions for that matter
where is Zack Wild
and what about Pearl Jam
i dont know Id probably dump about half of the guys on this list

Posted:
Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:17 pm
by F1fth
Yep, it certainly is a popularity contest. People like Chris Broderick would never get onto lists like that, even though he's insanely good at the instrument. Seriously... he's nuts.
And Scorpions!? You do know that their two most popular songs: "Rock You Like a Hurricane" and "No One Like You" pretty much the same song right? Although you're on the right track with Randy Rhoads.


Posted:
Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:32 am
by strike wolf
jnd94 wrote:What amazes me is the guy from Red Hot Chili Peppers beat out Eddie Van Halen.....

Eddie Van Halen is easily better than 70 and David Gilmour should be higher than 82. I thought that the Edge for U2 was a bit too far up. and while I'm sure there are more of them that were misplaced I didn't take but a cursory glance at it.