Conquer Club

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:27 am**

if "god" is suppose to have been around for ever isn't it just as probable that life itself has been around for ever in one form or another...

(lets have a kind and fair discussion here peoples)

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:32 am**

People created "God"

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:33 am**

People created "God"

as i have always said, someone needed a way to rule all the peoples... what better way then through fear???

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:48 am**

Uh, neither.

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:49 am**

Bavarian Raven wrote:
People created "God"

as i have always said, someone needed a way to rule all the peoples... what better way then through fear???

And false hope?

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:51 am**

Ever was reading these first few posts :lol:

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:51 am**

Bavarian Raven wrote:if "god" is suppose to have been around for ever isn't it just as probable that life itself has been around for ever in one form or another...

(lets have a kind and fair discussion here peoples)

Not scientificly no. God has not been proven either way so its impossible to tell whether he exists or not. Chances are, he's a flying spagghetti monster.

Life however, at least our current earth life, is almost definatly finite. Unless the comet theory is to be believed (i shouldn't thinjk it very likely) life is not very old and certainly not older than earth. Big banf theory makes it almost impossible for the slight chance of life coming about for trillions of yars after the bang. Hydrogen doesn't make much worth doing anything with.

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:01 pm**

I...I can't vote. Both are equally improbable...impossible in fact.

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:02 pm**

Frigidus wrote:I...I can't vote. Both are equally improbable...impossible in fact.

Agreed, both options are equally bad.

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:05 pm**

I voted Pro-skub.

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:40 pm**

Bavarian Raven wrote:if "god" is suppose to have been around for ever isn't it just as probable that life itself has been around for ever in one form or another...

(lets have a kind and fair discussion here peoples)

Well, possibly. Not very probable.

It's more likely that the Universe has been around forever in one form or another, because Life is unlikely to survive the theoretical cataclysm that occurred in the beginning (unless there are beings like Galactus and the Nibblonians out there).

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:12 pm**

This question doesn't make any sense.

Which is more probable, I will eat my cell phone or the sun will be green tomorrow?

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:20 pm**

Heimdall wrote:This question doesn't make any sense.

Which is more probable, I will eat my cell phone or the sun will be green tomorrow?

That depends, do you have a craving for Ericsson in your tummy?

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:22 pm**

Balsiefen wrote:. Unless the comet theory is to be believed (i shouldn't thinjk it very likely) life is not very old and certainly not older than earth.

Life is certainly not older than Earth?? Seeing as you don't seem to side with the God-ers, what is your basis for saying this?

Posted: **Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:42 pm**

btownmeggy wrote:
Balsiefen wrote:. Unless the comet theory is to be believed (i shouldn't thinjk it very likely) life is not very old and certainly not older than earth.

Life is certainly not older than Earth?? Seeing as you don't seem to side with the God-ers, what is your basis for saying this?

Well, where would life be before there were planets it could exist on?