Moderator: Community Team
Fieryo wrote:But if that were to be the case our legal system would NEVER allow me to be a deciding factor in that person's fate.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You have roughly 2 million people in jail in the United States. Sure no one wants in an ideal world to kill someone, but practically that's an option which is entirely viable. Clear out the prisons. Why should we pay for these bastards to live and thrive, spreading their criminal influence. Before poeple start telling me how a death penalty is so much more expensive, think for a moment : that is because of the continuous ridiculous appeals and trials over and over. Once we know they're guilty, all you need to pay for is a cigarette, a blindfold and 33 grams of lead. I'm not crying over the death of a pedophilic murderor or mutineers.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You have roughly 2 million people in jail in the United States. Sure no one wants in an ideal world to kill someone, but practically that's an option which is entirely viable. Clear out the prisons. Why should we pay for these bastards to live and thrive, spreading their criminal influence. Before poeple start telling me how a death penalty is so much more expensive, think for a moment : that is because of the continuous ridiculous appeals and trials over and over. Once we know they're guilty, all you need to pay for is a cigarette, a blindfold and 33 grams of lead. I'm not crying over the death of a pedophilic murderor or mutineers.
Snorri1234 wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:You have roughly 2 million people in jail in the United States. Sure no one wants in an ideal world to kill someone, but practically that's an option which is entirely viable. Clear out the prisons. Why should we pay for these bastards to live and thrive, spreading their criminal influence. Before poeple start telling me how a death penalty is so much more expensive, think for a moment : that is because of the continuous ridiculous appeals and trials over and over. Once we know they're guilty, all you need to pay for is a cigarette, a blindfold and 33 grams of lead. I'm not crying over the death of a pedophilic murderor or mutineers.
Hahahahaha.
This is so wrong!
Fieryo wrote:The vast majority of people in jail are there not because of capital offenses. They are there because of federally mandated minimum sentences for drug crimes or weapon possession. To say that the death penalty is a suitable way of decreasing the number if inmates is a) disgusting b) wrong and c) ignoring that small thing called 'fact'.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Increase the number of capital offences.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:You have roughly 2 million people in jail in the United States. Sure no one wants in an ideal world to kill someone, but practically that's an option which is entirely viable. Clear out the prisons. Why should we pay for these bastards to live and thrive, spreading their criminal influence. Before poeple start telling me how a death penalty is so much more expensive, think for a moment : that is because of the continuous ridiculous appeals and trials over and over. Once we know they're guilty, all you need to pay for is a cigarette, a blindfold and 33 grams of lead. I'm not crying over the death of a pedophilic murderor or mutineers.
Hahahahaha.
This is so wrong!
hahahahaha he has no arguments and thinks his incessant slander campaign against me because I'm such an awful person and a bigot and whats more a Papist (oh teh noes!!1!1) who opposes the "rights" of pederasts will suffice.
V.I. wrote:The number of court appeals granted to a death row candidate totals into the millions of dollars, far exceeding the economic costs of lifetime incarceration. Of course an alive prisoner occupies far more space than a dead one, leading to further prison-expansion costs.
So now we are faced with a more finite decision: Limit the appeals process, thereby cutting down the taxpayer costs (as virtually all death row inmates receive state-appointed lawyers, as they are entirely too poor to afford their own defense council) attached to the death penalty, of course this will undoubtedly lead to even greater numbers of inaccuracies, i.e. more people killed by the state than should have been killed by the state.
I feel a better question resides in why the U.S. has given up on reformation of prisoners? Our prison system yields far more new violent criminals (many of whom were not violent criminals before entering the prison system) than yields productive members of society.
Napoleon Ier wrote: Objectively it is wrong.
Napoleon Ier wrote:It is. Objectively it is wrong. However in a practical situation, I can see many cases where you may want to execute someone. The War on Terror, deserters, pedophiles...
V.I. wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:snorri very clearly wants me to be executed by being raped to death by a pederast dutch moped gang.
Congratulations, you've completely invalidated yourself in this discussion.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users