Conquer Club

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:26 pm**

NOT CENSORED YET!

post number 159...is it still there?

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:28 pm**

What a stupid comment that is.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:29 pm**

jay_a2j wrote:NOT CENSORED YET!

post number 159...is it still there?

No. What did you post? "9/11 is a lie! Jesus is coming! Vote Ron Paul! Wake up!", or something to that extent?

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:31 pm**

Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:34 pm**

Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:37 pm**

Frigidus wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Don't listen to Snorri, he hasn't taken his meds yet.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:38 pm**

jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Don't listen to Snorii, he hasn't taken his meds yet.

Well what did the post actually say?

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:40 pm**

Frigidus wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Don't listen to Snorii, he hasn't taken his meds yet.

Well what did the post actually say?

Are you kidding me? Not only am I not watching the FOX debate, I’m finding another news source! When a candidate pulls in 4.2 million one day and over 6 million another, he is a voice the people want to hear. FOX excluded him from the NH debate because they don’t want people to hear the truth. Unfair and Unbalanced? You decide.

* this message may not appear due to censoring*

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:44 pm**

jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Don't listen to Snorii, he hasn't taken his meds yet.

Well what did the post actually say?

Are you kidding me? Not only am I not watching the FOX debate, I’m finding another news source! When a candidate pulls in 4.2 million one day and over 6 million another, he is a voice the people want to hear. FOX excluded him from the NH debate because they don’t want people to hear the truth. Unfair and Unbalanced? You decide.

* this message may not appear due to censoring*

Oh, I agree 100%. Fox is pushing the candidates they like, and that fair and balanced crap shouldn't apply to any form of media. I'm not a Paul supporter, but it admittedly sucks for his supporters that he can't get into half the debates.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:52 pm**

jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Don't listen to Snorri, he hasn't taken his meds yet.

That was post 159 when I looked at it.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:53 pm**

jay_a2j wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Nah, it was some comment about how Obama is some sort of racist or something.

Heheh...it's censorship in the same way that banning racists on CC is censorship...my question is why exactly did Jay find that exciting? Do you think Obama's a racist?

Don't listen to Snorri, he hasn't taken his meds yet.

ah yes, the strictly "medecinal" marijuana

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:55 pm**

Is that the sound of another bout of flip-floppery I hear?

This time last year Jay was proclaiming Fox's unbiased opinion and great news coverage to all and sundry. It wasn't part of teh 'evil liberal press', you see...

Congratulations, Jay.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:57 pm**

"Only an idiot does not change opinions"

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:03 pm**

Napoleon Ier wrote:"Only an idiot does not change opinions"

The problem was that he's not changing opinions due to any new information. The inability to even consider an opposing view. Countless times Fox was shown to be biased, evidence was posted, examples of unbalanced political support and coverage... But no. Just part of the 'liberal media conspiracy' (which was Jay's passion before the 9/11 thing). You couldn't say a single thing to change his mind...

But dear old Ron, because he's for the constitution, can!

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:32 pm**

I used to think Fox News was the conservatives answer to fair and balanced news coverage. Not any more. The more I watch Fox News, the more it’s socially liberal attitude seemes to rear its ugly head. One strong evidence of this I think is Foxes refusal to give truely conservative candidates as much airtime as they do their liberal favorites such as Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney, and yes Mike Huckabee. We the voters should be given the chance to hear all of the candidates, even the ones we don’t like. I am against the fairness docterine, but if the elitist in the media (including Fox News) are going to continue to try and tell us who to vote for or when we should be outraged by this or that (Like when the they all but crucified the basketball player who said he didn’t care for gays and didn’t like to have to shower with them.) then I think maybe the Fairness Docterine might not be such a bad thing. And that is a very hard thing for me, a staunch Christian conservative to say. Jamie Standridge, Gastonia, NC

I'm guessing that this wasn't the post159 that you wrote?

Bad luck, looks like the boogeyman got you again eh?

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:50 pm**

Seriously though...that is creepy.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:48 pm**

I can still see it, it's just been moved down to 174.

Face it Jay, THEY are not concerned with a single post of yours in a political thread.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:18 pm**

i tell you what...if fox news is socially liberal...well i suppose i would not identify very much with something that was truly conservative as it were.

*this is me being rather diplomatic*

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:24 pm**

Get tonkaed, you are without question one of the brightest chaps on this site, and no doubt when it comes to philosophy, you could run syllogistic rings round me.
but mate, for the love of God-SAY WHAT YOU THINK!
You've got a great balnced, logical outlook on things but dont be so soft on knee jerk reactionaries like Jay-the guy's barely hang on bugger i dont want to get banned again!
You get my rambling drift-tell us what YOU think, and bugger everyone else. including me, obviously.
Sermon over.
God be with you.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:25 pm**

suggs wrote:Get tonkaed, you are without question one of the brightest chaps on this site, and no doubt when it comes to philosophy, you could run syllogistic rings round me.
but mate, for the love of God-SAY WHAT YOU THINK!
You've got a great balnced, logical outlook on things but dont be so soft on knee jerk reactionaries like Jay-the guy's barely hang on bugger i dont want to get banned again!
You get my rambling drift-tell us what YOU think, and bugger everyone else. including me, obviously.
Sermon over.
God be with you.

See! I'm not the only one.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:26 pm**

suggs wrote:Get tonkaed, you are without question one of the brightest chaps on this site, and no doubt when it comes to philosophy, you could run syllogistic rings round me.
but mate, for the love of God-SAY WHAT YOU THINK!
You've got a great balnced, logical outlook on things but dont be so soft on knee jerk reactionaries like Jay-the guy's barely hang on bugger i dont want to get banned again!
You get my rambling drift-tell us what YOU think, and bugger everyone else. including me, obviously.
Sermon over.
God be with you.

eek....what happens if i dont actually think anything?

I mean, as my good friend nietzsche once said...or at least as i will disgustingly paraphrase, it isnt such a bad thing to wear masks. I dont doubt there are plenty of people on here who have a decent handle on how i think about things.

And i have a terrible gift for rambling, so its hard for me to actually say what i think.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:27 pm**

You know when you have a swing, and you push it? It oscillates, and then resonates at a natural frequency before settling. The equation for this natural oscillation period T is given by :

T = 2 * 3.14 * root(l/g)

Hopefully jay will oscillate between Bush and the Neo-Con to conspiracy theorist until settling down.

Time = 2 * pie * root (length or depth of his conviction/gravity or he voice of our reason imploring him to stop)

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:29 pm**

Napoleon Ier wrote:You know when you have a swing, and you push it? It oscillates, and then resonates at a natural frequency before settling. The equation for this natural oscillation period T is given by :

T = 2 * 3.14 * root(l/g)

Hopefully jay will oscillate between Bush and the Neo-Con to conspiracy theorist until settling down.

Time = 2 * pie * root (length or depth of his conviction/gravity or he voice of our reason imploring him to stop)

Only in a vacuum, in which jay is most certainly not.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:49 pm**

Napoleon Ier wrote:You know when you have a swing, and you push it? It oscillates, and then resonates at a natural frequency before settling. The equation for this natural oscillation period T is given by :

T = 2 * 3.14 * root(l/g)

Hopefully jay will oscillate between Bush and the Neo-Con to conspiracy theorist until settling down.

Time = 2 * pie * root (length or depth of his conviction/gravity or he voice of our reason imploring him to stop)

It's pi, or better yet, π.

Posted: **Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:30 pm**

InkL0sed wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:You know when you have a swing, and you push it? It oscillates, and then resonates at a natural frequency before settling. The equation for this natural oscillation period T is given by :

T = 2 * 3.14 * root(l/g)

Hopefully jay will oscillate between Bush and the Neo-Con to conspiracy theorist until settling down.

Time = 2 * pie * root (length or depth of his conviction/gravity or he voice of our reason imploring him to stop)

Only in a vacuum, in which jay is most certainly not.

I don't know, his head does seem alarmingly hollow.

Conquer Club

They Didn't Censor It!!!!.....yet

They Didn't Censor It!!!!.....yet

Re: They Didn't Censor It!!!!.....yet