Page 1 of 1

Loose and Lose?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:14 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
When the hell did people start confusing these two words?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:19 pm
by Optimus Prime
I'd like to know the answer to this as well. It seems an odd thing to get confused by.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:25 pm
by Frigidus
People are confused by that? Damn, we're stupid.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:26 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
Its getting more and more frequent...I think mankind is devolving or something

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:38 pm
by jiminski
Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!

I almost always begin to spell 'lose' with a double 'o'; instinctively it seems correct. (i correct it of course)

the 'oooo' sound is present in both words to the same degree, paradoxically it is slightly less pronounced in 'loose'.
Phonetically it makes no sense for 'lose' to have a single 'o'. it is simply historical! God bless the English!
why does the extra 'o' change the final sound to 'sssss' instead of 'zzzzzz'? just because it should!

I love etymology but it is logical for people to make this mistake.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:04 pm
by Genghis Khant
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!

I hope you're being ironic there.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:05 pm
by Sir. Ricco
I doon't knoow. That darn oo gets stuck all the time.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:09 pm
by SolidLuigi
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!


When does the "Bare and Bear?" topic get started, lol

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:07 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
Im pretty sure when we got past 3rd grade we could tell the difference between loose and lose, in saying as well.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:15 pm
by unriggable
Your an idiot.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:19 pm
by Snowpepsi
Optimus Prime wrote:I'd like to know the answer to this as well. It seems an odd thing to get confused by.



And totally annoys the heck out of me.

Re: Loose and Lose?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:08 pm
by SolidLuigi
DirtyDishSoap wrote:When the hell did people start confusing these two words?


I don't think people are confused at what the words mean, they just are horrible spellers

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:15 pm
by daddy1gringo
Genghis Khant wrote:
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!
I hope you're being ironic there.
unriggable wrote:Your an idiot.
I hope you're bring ironic.
Since this has been brought up.
Bare(v)=expose.
Bear=carry or endure.
Your=belonging to you.
You're=You are.
Their=belonging to them.
They're=they are.
There=not here, some other place.

Let me get down off this soapbox before I twist my ankle.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:30 pm
by apey
I yuosed to bee gude at speilling untill the internet scroowed me all up

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:55 pm
by daddy1gringo
:lol:

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:55 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
daddy1gringo wrote:
Genghis Khant wrote:
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!
I hope you're being ironic there.
unriggable wrote:Your an idiot.
I hope you're bring ironic.
Since this has been brought up.
Bare(v)=expose.
Bear=carry or endure.
Your=belonging to you.
You're=You are.
Their=belonging to them.
They're=they are.
There=not here, some other place.

Let me get down off this soapbox before I twist my ankle.
I didnt mind the other ones cause it kind of grows on you to do it as well

But loose and lose? Come on now, when did the shit hit the fan

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:23 am
by Stymie
daddy1gringo wrote:
Genghis Khant wrote:
jiminski wrote:Ah i don't know... we all have our little crosses to bare!
I hope you're being ironic there.
unriggable wrote:Your an idiot.
I hope you're bring ironic.
Since this has been brought up.
Bare(v)=expose.
Bear=carry or endure.
Your=belonging to you.
You're=You are.
Their=belonging to them.
They're=they are.
There=not here, some other place.

Let me get down off this soapbox before I twist my ankle.


Well you need to get back on your soap box and explain the loose and lose definitions. That is what the topic was about and you didn't explain it to us.
(Not that I need you to explain it to me.) :lol:

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:40 am
by daddy1gringo
OK,

Lose = opposite of "win" or of "find". The "s" pronounced like a "z".

Loose = opposite of "tight". The "s" is pronounced like a hiss.

btw,
Two = 2: the whole number between one and three.
Too = 1. "Excesively", as in "too many" 2. "Also" as on "me too"
To = 1. preposition indicating destination, as in "Go to the store" or "give it to him" 2. The first part of an infinitive, as in "I am going to do that" or "I like to play."

I'm getting exasperated at people using "to" for "too"

Courtesy of your friendly neighborhood semantics and grammar demagogue.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:51 am
by unriggable
FYI daddy gringo I was being ironic. I was hoping somebody would catch that so I didn't look awkward

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:09 am
by hiitsmestevie1
maybe whoever your referring to was trying to type it with expression (like "ohhhh noooooooooooo ...im gonna loooooooooooooooooose" except not to that extent) or it can be a typo.(we all know i have enough of those;)

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:26 am
by sully800
The problem is that the english language has no consistent rules.

Lose, loose
Chose, Choose

Lose rhymes with choose, despite the spellings. Loose rhymes with moose, and chose rhymes with hose, but loose/choose and lose/chose do not rhyme.

It has never been a problem for me, and the people who screw it up are very annoying....but I still blame it on English primarily.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:53 am
by daddy1gringo
hiitsmestevie1 wrote: ...whoever your referring to...
Gaaaa! ](*,) ...whoever you're referring to... ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:58 am
by CrazyAnglican
sully800 wrote:The problem is that the english language has no consistent rules.



I blame the French. English was such a nice little Germanic language until William the Conqueror came in with his French speaking Viking wanabees and well the rest is history. The whole things history actually. I'll shut up now. :oops: