Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:19 am**

whats your veiw on the Queen, are we better getting her out or keep her.
I'm Scottish and I want her out but i would love to know the English peoples theories on the Royal Family

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:20 am**

For, because then we can laugh at you guys for still having a monarchy.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:20 am**

meh. i don't think she should make as much money as she does, but all in all, i got few complaints.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:30 am**

It seems to me that the Royal Family and all the trappings are a huge tourist draw. They (The Queen & Prince Charles) are the Mickey & Minnie Mouse of GB. :lol:

But I am American, so what do I know.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:32 am**

Backglass wrote:It seems to me that the Royal Family and all the trappings are a huge tourist draw. They (The Queen & Prince Charles) are the Mickey & Minnie Mouse of GB.

But I am American, so what do I know.

actually, that's probably more accurate than anything i could have thought of...

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:32 am**

Freddy Mercury was a brilliant artist.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:33 am**

I accidentally voted against. Why have against on top?

Anyway I had to give a long speech to my class on whether they are good or not and there are many benefits to the negatives.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:33 am**

ignotus wrote:Freddy Mercury was a brilliant artist.

I decided I wasn't going to say it, but I'm glad someone did.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:33 am**

Neoteny wrote:
ignotus wrote:Freddy Mercury was a brilliant artist.

I decided I wasn't going to say it, but I'm glad someone did.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:34 am**

firth4eva wrote:I accidentally voted against. Why have against on top?

Anyway I had to give a long speech to my class on whether they are good or not and there are many benefits to the negatives.

I'd assume he's against and put his favorite choice on top.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:37 am**

nothing was meant by putting Against as first choice

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:40 am**

Why are so many people against?

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:41 am**

Only 5 are against

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:42 am**

firth4eva wrote:Why are so many people against?

because, in the end, the monarchy are nothing (or little) more than a tourist attraction. a very good one, but still...

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:51 am**

i agree

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:55 am**

Basically we pay a lot of money to have a bunch of people who go to visit other countries and smile and wave because they were born into a certain family.

I think there is quite a lot wrong with that.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:46 pm**

You lose the Monarchy, you lose the Commonwealth.
That means losing important ties with Australia, Canada, India and the others.

Also, she can ditch the British Government at any time she wishes.

Jeremy Clarkson wrote: Having the willpower not to get rid of those babbling lunatics in Government, even for fun, must take great strength.

I agree with that. In fact, If I were king, on 1st April I'd say:
"Right! That's it! Off with the lot of you! You're fired!"
Now that would be the ultimate April Fools Prank!

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:53 pm**

Big fan actually. Sorry Suggs...

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:02 pm**

Guiscard wrote:Big fan actually. Sorry Suggs...

Agreed. We are better off with them I think. I dont want to end up like the French :lol:

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:10 pm**

Guiscard wrote:Big fan actually. Sorry Suggs...

Shit. Have I already given my anti-monarchy rant? Balls, I was looking forward to using words like PARASITES, LIVING ANACHRONISMS, POINTLESS-YET-HARMFUL-TO-A-VISION-OF-AN-EGALITARIAN-SOCIETY,DESCENDANTS OF MURDERERS AND THIEVES, WHO MAKE THIS COUNTRY LOOK LIKE AN ABSOLUTE JOKE TO THE REST OF THE WORLD.

Damn. I'm getting predictable*

*a predictably annoying little Suggs star to make some facetious, comment- ending "one liner". How predictable.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:14 pm**

Gypsys Kiss wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Big fan actually. Sorry Suggs...

Agreed. We are better off with them I think. I dont want to end up like the French

Yes, how have they coped over the last two hundred years. Hah! On the one hand you have the UK, a relatively prosperous, 2nd/3rd rate global power, with political stability, and on the other you have the French who have...

Oh yes, THE SAME. Except they have better food, women*, drink, live longer, greater sense of civic pride, AN INDEPENDANT FOREIGN POLICY.

God they are fools. Bring back Loius and the boys-they'd sort that Frenchie mess out.
More cake, anyone?

*Its FACT that Republics have fitter women than monarchies. Dutch women versus Italian. Case proven

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:20 pm**

suggs wrote:*Its FACT that Republics have fitter women than monarchies. Dutch women versus Italian. Case proven

Another reason for me to vote against the monarchy.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:40 pm**

suggs wrote: Dutch women versus Italian. Case proven

I have to disagree here. Dutch women look as good as Italian women when they're young and a whole lot better when they get older. Plus, they do everything and they're against their mothers ruling your life. And they don't have an uncle Luigi with hitman connections.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:46 pm**

Frigidus wrote

For, because then we can laugh at you guys for still having a monarchy.

That is somewhat ironic from a native of a country with George Bush as its Head of State.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm**

Fruitcake wrote:Frigidus wrote

For, because then we can laugh at you guys for still having a monarchy.

That is somewhat ironic from a native of a country with George Bush as its Head of State.

Not at all ironic. Bush might a pea brained pillock- but they can, and must (that old amendment which i always forget, you know the two term limits for a single President) get rid of him.

We're stuck with our personal pea brain until her body finally realises that Ma'am Brain has long since departed.