Page 1 of 1

WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:16 am
by suggs
Studies from the Vermont Institute (V.I.) claim that women have an increasing disposition to seek frequent and changeable partnerships with men.
Off the record, a spokesmen from V.I. said "They're FICKLE WHORES".
The institute has distanced itself from these remarks, claiming they represent too personal an attack on women ("A bit too much like a "flame"", one senior source suggested).

What do people think of V.I.'s new research.
Are women promiscuous and unreliable?
Do they appear to have an increasing prediliction for exchanging money for sexual favours?

It does seem disrespectful to women, so of course I'm uncomfortable with V.I.s remarks ( :P :P :P :P )
But a valid scientific study that need discussion, i feel.

Lets keep this out of flame wars, people. ;)
Thanks to the V. I.

ps an unamed source from the Western Institute for Caligraphic, Kickboxing and Edible Diseases (W.I.C.K.E.D), said "This is a load of old balls, and we're gonna lock it anyway". Who knows what the relevance of this remark may have to the future of V.I.s research? :P :P :P :P

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:31 am
by DaGip
From my experience, women love cock and will cheat on you on the drop of a hat. Therefore, the best way to keep that from happening is to threaten the lives of her entire family if she EVER cheats on you! If you just threaten her life, she might be one of those crazy chicks that dig the abuse; so you got to actually threaten her with murdering her siblings...that way you don't have to leave any marks on her face or neck.

Also, it is my theory that every woman is a lesbian in heat. Not only do they want cock 24 hours a day, but they would also like a nice warm Mammy muffin in their face.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:37 am
by suggs
Don't get me wrong Da Gip, that was all great.
But the phrase "MAMMY MUFFIN" will, I hope, stay with me to my death bed.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:52 am
by DaGip
Watch this short video on Cheating Wives:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NelDG_re9PI

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:36 pm
by AlbroShlo
Yes they are fickle and yes they are .... other things as well. It's all a matter of how small or largely they are compensated.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:38 pm
by Dancing Mustard
I think that this topic would be more sensibly addressed if a poll were available for the general public to make a record of their opinions on the matter.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:56 pm
by suggs
Dont think I can add a poll :(

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:59 pm
by Snorri1234
Dancing Mustard wrote:I think that this topic would be more sensibly addressed if a poll were available for the general public to make a record of their opinions on the matter.


About whether we believe that all women are generally fickle and show traits of promiscuity.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:13 pm
by Dancing Mustard
Yes, I believe that such a canvassing of opinions would be of incalculable use to both sides discussing this matter.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:21 pm
by wicked
suggs wrote:Dont think I can add a poll :(


PM me what you want added and I'll do it.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:26 pm
by suggs
wicked wrote:
suggs wrote:Dont think I can add a poll :(


PM me what you want added and I'll do it.


*quakes in boots* I think it might be...borderline :)
Remember, the cheques in the post.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:32 pm
by wicked
LMAO!! oh shit! guess I should've specified I was talking about the POLL!! :lol:

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:37 pm
by suggs
wicked wrote:LMAO!! oh shit! guess I should've specified I was talking about the POLL!! :lol:


so thats a "no" to the Police Womans outfit? :cry: ;) :)

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:30 pm
by greenoaks
traditionally women are promiscuous.

it is only with the breakdown of the tribal structure into family units that men have been able to force women into accepting only one partner.

women's lib has given women back the freedom to choose. weren't we stupid.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 9:30 pm
by V.I.
Dr. Suggs and I identifying the "Tramp Gene" at our laboratory on the Vermont Institute campus (right: Dr. Suggs, the Thom Yorke look-a-like, gesturing with his pet dildo named "Wicked"):
Image

Spawning pit for future "traditionally promiscuous women", according to fellow research scientist Dr. Greenoaks, Wh.o.r:
Image

Dr. Greenoaks, would you please assist me in my office? I'm currently researching the giant one-eyed spitting Salami-snake, though it takes skilled coaxing from a member of the liberated, post-post tribalism elite. Dr. Suggs, the nipple-clamps if you please.

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 3:27 am
by MeDeFe
I will refrain from offering up my opinions on this topic to the general public until a poll has been added to this thread which can be subsequently commented on. I give you 24 hours to amend this poll-less state, otherwise I am prepared to make use of the powers invested in me by me signing up on this site and create a new thread with a poll, of course linking it to this one.


And this one's for suggs, police woman outfits are perfectly fine.

Image

Re: WOMEN, THE VERMONT INSTITUTE (V. I)

PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 5:12 am
by DAZMCFC
MeDeFe wrote:I will refrain from offering up my opinions on this topic to the general public until a poll has been added to this thread which can be subsequently commented on. I give you 24 hours to amend this poll-less state, otherwise I am prepared to make use of the powers invested in me by me signing up on this site and create a new thread with a poll, of course linking it to this one.


And this one's for suggs, police woman outfits are perfectly fine.

Image



see, fickle and whorish.