Page 1 of 1
WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:18 pm
by pancakemix
Discuss.
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:38 pm
by jonesthecurl
...would be WW1 but later.
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:44 pm
by strike wolf
Probably a different role for Germany, Russia, and Italy.
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:58 pm
by InkL0sed
jonesthecurl wrote:...would be WW1 but later.
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:58 pm
by DAZMCFC
would they bother with the "I" curl?
it would be just WW.
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:03 pm
by jonesthecurl
Well, to be honest, I don't know when they first called WW1 that - between the wars it was referred to as "The Great War".
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:55 pm
by Nikolai
Without WWI? There wouldn't have been a WWII. Especially given how drastically different things would've had to be to avoid WWI.
Re: WWII without WWI

Posted:
Thu Aug 21, 2008 3:31 pm
by DAZMCFC
jonesthecurl wrote:Well, to be honest, I don't know when they first called WW1 that - between the wars it was referred to as "The Great War".
it wasn't that great if you snuffed it.