Page 1 of 1
Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:48 pm
by Freetymes
Friends, Romans, Countrymen, CC's Finest, Lend me your ears...
Some of you have already recieved PMs, but for many of you this will be news:
FW has sunk to perhaps its lowest ever ebb, and quite frankly something needs to be done about it. As such, this Halloween The Tavernside Fire Clan is aiming to host the greatest flame-battling tournament that CC has ever seen, and my fellow forum-goers, We want you to be a part of it.
The aim of the game is to to dazzle and impress with cutting prose and blazing wit, and to go head-to-head against the CC Forum’s finest (from all forums, not juts FW) . Quality is the name of the game and dull spam and cursing will be frowned upon by judges.
The contest format will be 2v2 4-posts, and will start running as soon as we receive RSVPs from enough entrants. Sign up today to take part, don’t let FW languish in the gutter.
Who's with Us? If you are please RSVP Dancing Mustard ASAP!
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:19 pm
by Juan_Bottom
I heard that all the cool kids are doing this... also, I heard that there are free boobs...
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:34 pm
by jonesthecurl
I once won a live insulting contest with Billy Bullshit - who used to make his money selling insults to people.
Honest.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:58 am
by Dancing Mustard
Wow, what a bunch of pansies OTers are.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:02 am
by Ditocoaf
Hmm... the flaming forum is challenging the random forum to a flame war...
I just can't understand why there wouldn't there be many takers?
BTW, I'll be in. I'll try my hand at this "insulting" stuff. Can I clarify the rules briefly, though? For it to be considered "flaming," do you always have to attack ad-hominim, or can you try to dismantle their argument elsewhere as well?
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:14 am
by King_Herpes
I'm going do serve you all up a hot dish of my fist on a silver platter. Be prepared for my frequent money shots aimed directly at the face of any bitch that gets the misfortune of being paired against me. Hope you bring your rain jackets kids. It'll be something like Gallagher gone Bukkake!
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:19 am
by Frop
Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:20 am
by King_Herpes
Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
What about forced pregnancy?
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:28 am
by Frop
King_Herpes wrote:Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
What about forced pregnancy?
Are you talking about serial rapists with a cause?
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:35 am
by King_Herpes
Frop wrote:King_Herpes wrote:Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
What about forced pregnancy?
Are you talking about serial rapists with a cause?
A humble offering if you will. While diversifying the gene pool it gives fatties and ugly fatties a reason to roam the globe. They'll have a bright new life to guide into the world and will have somebody to listen too their woes and stories of when they weren't as rotund. A win win. Also, not nearly as boring if you ask me.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:39 am
by Dancing Mustard
Ditocoaf wrote:Hmm... the flaming forum is challenging the random forum to a flame war...
Allow me to clarify: Pairings are all going to be randomised. FW-Regulars will be teamed up with GD/OT-Regulars, etc etc.
It's not just FW v CC-Others. That'd be dull-City. It's all about getting people who aren't FW frequenters to come get involved in the action (and hopefully make the place more interesting along the way).
Ditocoaf wrote:For it to be considered "flaming," do you always have to attack ad-hominim, or can you try to dismantle their argument elsewhere as well?
Both are preferable. Both are flaming... both are completely acceptable. Welcome on board.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:49 pm
by jonesthecurl
Just to get this straight : is this the same thing as the PM from Bugger King was about? The flame-roasting thing? Or is this separate?
Both seem to have the same purpose, which is to make FW more interesting.
I've seldom ventured into FW, because (at least since I've been here) it hasn't been very interesting - mainly anaotomical comparisons and threatened insertions. Making it more interesting has to be a good thing, although I can live without it.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:48 pm
by Juan_Bottom
jonesthecurl wrote:Just to get this straight : is this the same thing as the PM from Bugger King was about? The flame-roasting thing? Or is this separate?
Both seem to have the same purpose, which is to make FW more interesting.
I've seldom ventured into FW, because (at least since I've been here) it hasn't been very interesting - mainly anaotomical comparisons and threatened insertions. Making it more interesting has to be a good thing, although I can live without it.
They are completely seperate. One is a tourney for fun, the other is a 'forever' roast.
Call it a magical co-incidence.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:24 pm
by jonesthecurl
um, well I guess I'm in for this one too.
WHy not? What could a fat old welsh cockney with a huge ego have to fear?
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:35 pm
by Nikolai
Frop wrote:Forced 'flaming' is boring as hell.
This.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:35 pm
by Backglass
Frop wrote:Flaming is boring as hell.
Better.
Re: Could You Be The Winner?!?

Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:41 pm
by Nikolai
No, some flaming is actually quite fun. I had a great time flaming Hendy for being a dumbass about a clan challenge, back in the day.

But "forced" flaming really is boring.