demonfork wrote:If thimerosal (50% methylmercury by weight) is so safe then why is the FDA
"continuing its efforts toward reducing or removing thimerosal from all existing vaccines"
One quick correction of the information stated above: thiomersal is (about) half
ethyl Mercury, by weight. Still dangerous, but different.
demonfork wrote:If thimerosal causes no harm then why was a special provision that provides protection from lawsuits against corporations like the Eli Lilly Company (manufacturer of thimerosal) added to the Patriot Act?
Because all the blame for the insertion of a chemical into a vaccine should be the fault of the vaccine-maker, not the producer of the chemical. Sue-happy individuals tend to take things too far. Why the hell would the government be protecting a company that is giving our children autism? Anyhow, that whole thing was repealed in 2003, so the point is moot.
demonfork wrote:Introducing a heavy metal, like mercury, into your bloodstream is not safe, especially for children and especially when multiple vaccinations are performed at one interval.
However, for most people, the amounts of heavy metals in the vaccines cause no problems at all, even with many vaccines in a short period of time. Why is this?
demonfork wrote:Mercury poising can cause a wide variety of neurological problems, many of which have characteristics that are indistinguishable from autism.
Indeed; mercury poisoning is serious business.
demonfork wrote:Jenny McCarthy is not against vaccines, she has publicly proclaimed this on many occasions, she is against the dangerous preservatives, like thimerosal, that are added to the vaccines.
Her campaign to help make parents aware of these types of dangerous preservatives that are present in vaccines is commendable. Her efforts have helped afford many uninformed parents the ability to insist on receiving thimerosal and or preservative free vaccinations when they immunize their children.
I saw her on Larry King the other day, and she does say that she's not anti-vaccine, "she's anti-vaccines-that-don't-measure-up-to-her-standard-of-safety". Miss McCarthy said:
“It’s not my fault if vaccine-preventable diseases come back; it’s the pharmaceutical companies’ fault for not making ’safer’ vaccines. Oh, and, by the way, we decide what’s ’safe.”
Unfortunately, her ideas of safety are based on a concept that has been disproven several times over. Studies have found no link between thiomersal and autism.
It's her campaign to make parents aware of vaccine ingredients that she
thinks are dangerous.
demonfork wrote:I think that it is disgusting that the author of this website is attempting to spin Ms. McCarthy's efforts by making people believe that she is against immunizations and therefore responsible for the deaths of non immunized children.
I think it's a perfectly fair assessment. Someone of her notoriety can spread ideas around very effectively. And if they are harmful, even as well-intentioned I'm sure we can assume they are, she should take responsibility for it. There is no excuse to not vaccinate our children. We are putting them and others in danger by not doing so.