Conquer Club

What do you think.

I picked #2.

Same with me.

well, gay marriage would be fine with me if they call it a civil union and not marriage.. if you catch my drift.. There was no choice up there so i didnt pick any...

Ok I added that. Sorry I had to delete the votes already made in the process.

Two boners go together like two left shoes.

King_Herpes wrote:Two boners go together like two left shoes.

JJM wrote::?:

B====D + B====D = Gay

I think it is absolutly wrong.

If two guys want to live together and have butt sex and call it marriage, why do you have a problem with it?

Well good thing North Dakota is a conservative state. That way I know that we will never allow gay marriage.

JJM wrote:Well good thing North Dakota is a conservative state. That way I know that we will never allow gay marriage.

Until the supreme court tells them that its unconstitutional to prohibit it you mean.

At one point in time, African Americans were not allowed to marry whites. This was an entire group of people prohibited from engaging in the rights that all others have: Unconstitutional.

Blocking people because of their sexual orientation is blocking a group of people from rights that all others have. Its technically Unconstitutional. If marriage is deemed a civil right, all laws against it, are immediately moot.

If others have the rights, than all must have the rights. Its the basic principle of the Constitution. So, its only a matter of time, that all the states can just erase the laws prohibiting gay marriage.

Accept it, like it, fight it, rebel against it. It wont matter in the end.

Simon Viavant wrote:If two guys want to live together and have butt sex and call it marriage, why do you have a problem with it?

It is morraly wrong besides calling it marriage is not the smae as aveing a marriage. That is just plain cruel to have a preist marry gays if he dosen't believe in it.

AAFitz wrote:

JJM wrote:Well good thing North Dakota is a conservative state. That way I know that we will never allow gay marriage.

Until the supreme court tells them that its unconstitutional to prohibit it you mean.

I don't think that will happen.

Of course they should be allowed to get married. Stop being ridiculous. What is this, the Dark Ages?

scissor me timbers

JJM wrote:

Simon Viavant wrote:If two guys want to live together and have butt sex and call it marriage, why do you have a problem with it?

It is morraly wrong besides calling it marriage is not the smae as aveing a marriage. That is just plain cruel to have a preist marry gays if he dosen't believe in it.

Then you don't have to force him to, just let them find a priest who believes in it.

pimpdave wrote:Of course they should be allowed to get married. Stop being ridiculous. What is this, the Dark Ages?

It saddens me that you say that. What happend to morals.

pimpdave wrote:Of course they should be allowed to get married. Stop being ridiculous. What is this, the Dark Ages?

Well.. In North Dakota, obviously so.

I only clicked on this because it was made by Jim-boy.

Simon Viavant wrote:

JJM wrote:

Simon Viavant wrote:If two guys want to live together and have butt sex and call it marriage, why do you have a problem with it?

It is morraly wrong besides calling it marriage is not the smae as aveing a marriage. That is just plain cruel to have a preist marry gays if he dosen't believe in it.

Then you don't have to force him to, just let them find a priest who believes in it.

There probably isn't a preist that believes in gay marriage. I don't think that I have ever heard of a preist that hasen't read the Bible.

JJM wrote:

pimpdave wrote:Of course they should be allowed to get married. Stop being ridiculous. What is this, the Dark Ages?

It saddens me that you say that. What happend to morals.

You found out how to spell morals.
God boy.

Simon Viavant wrote:

JJM wrote:

pimpdave wrote:Of course they should be allowed to get married. Stop being ridiculous. What is this, the Dark Ages?

It saddens me that you say that. What happend to morals.

You found out how to spell morals.
God boy.

Uffda.

I mean, I still think we should be allowed to make fun of like, super fairies and what not, but let them get married.

It's not fair that we can make fun of sluts (Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, etc) for being sluts, but not gays for being gay. That's my big complaint.

Have you seen some of these guys? I would swear they were trying to get laughs if I wasn't so apathetic to it anymore (although I always crack up on the inside).

JJM wrote:

AAFitz wrote:

JJM wrote:Well good thing North Dakota is a conservative state. That way I know that we will never allow gay marriage.

Until the supreme court tells them that its unconstitutional to prohibit it you mean.

I don't think that will happen.

People didnt think slavery would end, that blacks would ride in the front, or that white/black marriages would be legal either.

That didnt make them correct.

You might want to read up on the subject a bit too.. Its closer than you think.

Hey Jimmy, have you heard of Separation of Church and State?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state_in_the_United_States