Moderator: Tournament Directors
TeeGee wrote:in please
bearshark3 wrote:sure, pencil me in
TheTrueNorth wrote:Hate this map........in plz
It’s not perhaps a sentiment one has too often in life, but it can be said without hesitation that the past year or so has been a good one for popular accounts of the lives of 17th-century English polymaths.
DoomYoshi wrote:I already don't like this tournament. The games should come one at a time, or 2 at a time. Right now with 6 games going it's more "I'm overwhelmed by trying to keep my games straight" than "I'm exploring this map and learning how to play it".
DD2 wrote:How are people listed with "10" wins when only 6 games were sent out?
uyumaykimaw wrote:DD2 wrote:How are people listed with "10" wins when only 6 games were sent out?
cuz the number of wins listed is not the number of wins in this tourney.....it is the number of wins the player had on this map at the time of sign up(if over 10 wins at time of sign up then does not qualify for the tourney).
rjhankey wrote:This is an interesting format -- Yoshi is right that it's a challenge to keep track of the games, I'm just leaving more notes in the game chat than usual to try and keep up! It's also an interesting twist in that you're playing within your group of 4, but with different partners, so as you share game strategies with one partner in a game, you're potentially indicating your tendency in another game against that same player. Just observations, things to think about for the next iteration of this type of tournament.
trinicardinal wrote:1 last game active... hopefully I'll be able to start the next round during next week
trinicardinal wrote:trinicardinal wrote:1 last game active... hopefully I'll be able to start the next round during next week
that last game is still active.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users