Moderator: Community Team
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
joeyjordison wrote:ok wat do people think of american involvement in somalia?
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Mirak wrote:Has someone discovered oil in Somalia?
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
what,me worry? wrote: Isreal will sweep up the mess in palestine and all that will remain will be a few middle eastern fronts and stabilizing the phillipines.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
mr. incrediball wrote:Mirak wrote:Has someone discovered oil in Somalia?
probably something more valuable, but the U.S government are keeping it secret until they claim somalia as the 51st state and take it all
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
I eaqualy despise people who consider that killing little children is "ok in certain conditions" no matter their country of origin.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:1. I don't hate US. I don't hate at all. It's bad for karma.
2.I eaqualy despise people who consider that killing little children is "ok in certain conditions" no matter their country of origin.
If that is "everyone around me" then world has become one fucked-up place real fast. So, please explain, when is it ok to kill kids? 'Cause I honestly can't think of a way in wich bombing a residential building and killing children is something good. If you know how it's good, tell me.
mandalorian2298 wrote:1. I don't hate US. I don't hate at all. It's bad for karma.
2.I eaqualy despise people who consider that killing little children is "ok in certain conditions" no matter their country of origin.
If that is "everyone around me" then world has become one fucked-up place real fast. So, please explain, when is it ok to kill kids? 'Cause I honestly can't think of a way in wich bombing a residential building and killing children is something good. If you know how it's good, tell me.
Utafar wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:1. I don't hate US. I don't hate at all. It's bad for karma.
2.I eaqualy despise people who consider that killing little children is "ok in certain conditions" no matter their country of origin.
If that is "everyone around me" then world has become one fucked-up place real fast. So, please explain, when is it ok to kill kids? 'Cause I honestly can't think of a way in wich bombing a residential building and killing children is something good. If you know how it's good, tell me.
hey you remind me of someone...what's your real name?
P Gizzle wrote:2. can you tell me one thriving country who hasn't been in a war and killed a civilian child?? I can't....WWII, Britain, US, even Canada went into France and accidently killed kids......hey, it's not good, but it happend, and let me tell you that if we didnt kill those kids, we wouldnt have been there, and wouldnt have won that war, and the world would be run by a facist dictator......so, of course, that's a reason to kill kids...so, that other kids can have a free life, and not die......it ain't good, but it's a hard world out there
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Look all I am saying is that, in the last few years, American troops killed MUCH more civilians then any "terrorist" organization. IMO ANY country that sends it's troops to attack civil population of another country is a menace to world-peace. Even if that country is USA.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
mandalorian2298 wrote:P Gizzle wrote:2. can you tell me one thriving country who hasn't been in a war and killed a civilian child?? I can't....WWII, Britain, US, even Canada went into France and accidently killed kids......hey, it's not good, but it happend, and let me tell you that if we didnt kill those kids, we wouldnt have been there, and wouldnt have won that war, and the world would be run by a facist dictator......so, of course, that's a reason to kill kids...so, that other kids can have a free life, and not die......it ain't good, but it's a hard world out there
Well, perhaps every country in the world should start killing children. Then they would all become thriving. Or is it when country becomes thriving it thereby earns the right to kill children.
New definition of terrorism: Killing civilians executed by a non-thriving country.
Killing civilians done by USA = COUNTERTERRORISM
Look all I am saying is that, in the last few years, American troops killed MUCH more civilians then any "terrorist" organization. IMO ANY country that sends it's troops to attack civil population of another country is a menace to world-peace. Even if that country is USA.
P Gizzle wrote:no, im saying that no matter where you go, in war civilians are being killed....it's sad but true.....
think of it this way, if you can.....
during hiroshima and nagasaki, a lot of people died right?
could you image how many people would've died if the US tried to take the homeland? all of the Japanese woulda killed themselves!!
and im not sayin that the US has a right to kill civilians, im saying that i can't think of a country today that hasn't. can you?
so, say what you will about the US being terrorists....what do you suggest to get these guys dead?
George dubya?MeDeFe wrote: The Japanese had tried to surrender several times even before the A-bombs fell, but a certain president wanted to make a point.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur