Senfive wrote:pancakemix wrote:Vote No Lynch This is getting nowhere
First post, nothing suspicious.pancakemix wrote:I guess
Unvote no lynch
Vote Hitman079
2 posts later, O_o, maybe nothing.pancakemix wrote:Unvote Hitman079
Vote puff
must...get....majority...
Posts again yet has no good reason but must jump on bandwagon.pancakemix wrote:Look, first off, pyro posted his vote on the last page. It has taken us two days to get eight votes for puff. He's one vote away from getting lynched. You want to try and convince us that we should change our minds even though some of us (like yours truly) will not change their vote and we'll end up with no lynch. That would not be good.
wow you still never gave a reason as to why Puff should have been lynched yet wanted others to jump on the Wagon to hammer her.
I have to say Pyro just coming in and voting like that was suspicious but that wasn't me. I back up my claims with quotes and patterns people make. I am going to have to Vote PancakeMix for above reasons.
Post 1: As you said, nothing suspicious
Post 2: Just a simple joke. Hitman told me to vote, I voted for him. HaHa
Post 3: Puff was close to lynch. Better to get more clues than wait for nothing.
Post 4: Again, puff was close. Convincing the last person finished it of so we can have more clues.
It was said before pyro was acting suspicious. I agree. You, too are acting suspicious. vote Senfive