Moderator: Community Team
wolfpack0530 wrote:I say, put a 3 game max on simultaneous speed games.
K-dub wrote:whats the point of this? seriously? ur complaining that ur opponent misses turns? isnt that supposed to be an advantage to u if he misses dont you think?
ljex wrote:wolfpack0530 wrote:I say, put a 3 game max on simultaneous speed games.
I agree with the idea of creation of multiple speed games but i do not agree with the idea of a limit of 3 because when i first started i could play 4-5 speed games at once without missing any turns, and that was when i didn't have clickable maps. I don't play 1 vs 1 sequential speed anymore but i bet i could do 6-7 1 vs 1 speed games without missing a single turn.
AndyDufresne wrote:Hm, what would the be the most reasonable limit to Speed Game creation?
And how would or would not Active games factor and count into the limit?
--Andy
AAFitz wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Hm, what would the be the most reasonable limit to Speed Game creation?
And how would or would not Active games factor and count into the limit?
--Andy
I would think the 50 limit would still apply, but the 10 limit, which I think will be the limit, would only affect the speed games.
so, you are allowed 50 waiting games total, which is what it is now, and only 10 of those can be speed games.
I kind of expected this to be suggested at some point to be honest. As long as it isnt an infringement on any real person, who is really playing speed games, then the limit only affects the unreasonable ones, and the deabeats, and point dumpers really.
Hell, it even protects people from themselves and biting off more than they can chew. 10 speed games is quite a few to pull off at once. Anyone who needs more, probably needs something else...lol
max is gr8 wrote:If they are sequential 8 players then you could play 10 with ease. If they are 2 player freestyles you could not. Because of such I endorse this 10 speed game policy then no matter how many games you are playing you can manage
jleonnn wrote:max is gr8 wrote:If they are sequential 8 players then you could play 10 with ease. If they are 2 player freestyles you could not. Because of such I endorse this 10 speed game policy then no matter how many games you are playing you can manage
I agree. Perhaps the limitation should only cover certain types of games
azezzo wrote:Concise description:
limit the # of identical speed games created by the same player
K-dub wrote:whats the point of this? seriously? ur complaining that ur opponent misses turns? isnt that supposed to be an advantage to u if he misses dont you think?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users