Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I agreeedocsil wrote:Greenpeace = dumb shit
I agreeSerbia wrote:Nope, really don't care. In fact, next time I buy a candy bar, I'll make it a Kit Kat in honor of you.
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
KiwiTaker wrote:Here something to put you off eating Nestle Kit Kats.
http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/campaigns/climate-change/kit-kat-video?easter
Symmetry wrote:There are better reasons to avoid nestle:
1) Their awful awful chocolate
2) That whole thing where they told poor people in Africa that breastfeeding was bad, and their crappy substitute formula was better for babies.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:Symmetry wrote:There are better reasons to avoid nestle:
1) Their awful awful chocolate
2) That whole thing where they told poor people in Africa that breastfeeding was bad, and their crappy substitute formula was better for babies.
Well if your against it I am going to go Nestle shopping. BTW. kit kats rock.
Greenpeace = sewage.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
jefjef wrote:Nestle to Make Fairtrade KitKats in U.K., Ireland (Update1)
Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A
By Thomas Mulier
Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Nestle SA, the world’s biggest food company, will start certifying some KitKat bars in the U.K. and Ireland as Fairtrade, following Cadbury Plc, which started producing mass-market Fairtrade chocolate this year.
KitKat four-finger bars will carry the moniker from January, the Vevey, Switzerland-based company’s U.K. unit said in an e-mailed statement released today. Cadbury switched its Dairy Milk brand to Fairtrade in the U.K. in July.
Chocolate makers in the U.K. sold 28 million pounds ($46 million) of Fairtrade chocolate in the U.K. last year. The share of Fairtrade in that market will rise to 10 percent in 2010 because of Nestle and Cadbury’s changes from 1 percent in 2008, said Eileen Maybin, a spokeswoman for Fairtrade in the U.K. The Fairtrade designation requires chocolate makers pay an extra $150 per ton of cocoa and guarantee a minimum price of $1,600 a ton, she said. The extra money is used for development projects.
KitKats make up about 23 percent of Nestle’s U.K. confectionery sales. A quarter of that is the four-finger bars, which had U.K. sales of 43 million pounds in 2008, Nestle said. The price of the Fairtrade KitKats will be the same, Andrew Lewin, an external communications official for Nestle, said by phone. Nestle sells about 250 million four-finger KitKats in the U.K. each year, he added.
Nestle plans to provide 12 million stronger, more productive cocoa trees to farmers over the next decade. The company has said it will spend 460 million Swiss francs ($456 million) on cocoa, coffee science and “sustainability” projects over the next decade.
Mars Inc., Cadbury’s largest rival, said in April that all cocoa it uses will be sustainably sourced, with the approval of the Rainforest Alliance, by 2020. The Rainforest Alliance is a U.S.-based group that certifies goods have been produced from farms that meet its social and environmental standards.
Kraft Foods Inc. has bid 10.3 billion pounds ($16.8 billion) for Cadbury.
Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune..
b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune..
Well i guess i can understand one who is so easily terrified coming to that conclusion.
Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Well i guess i can understand one who is so easily terrified coming to that conclusion.
Well, I guess I can understand one who is so used to coming to idiotic conclusions coming to that conclusion.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune. I don't know much about Nestle's business practices, but I'm well aware of Greenpeace's activities. f*ck Greenpeace. And anyone that supports them.
Snorri1234 wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune. I don't know much about Nestle's business practices, but I'm well aware of Greenpeace's activities. f*ck Greenpeace. And anyone that supports them.
That's bullshit though. While Greenpeace does indeed use questionable tactics, most of what could be considered terrorism is at most loosely associated with them. They're kind of dicks, but that's a far cry from "terrorism" and certainly a far cry from being worse than Nestlé.
I mean, f*ck dude, Nestlé! The horrible shit that company has done for their profits is astounding.
KiwiTaker wrote:I consider the Sea Shepherds to be more militant than Greenpeace.
Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune..
Well i guess i can understand one who is so easily terrified coming to that conclusion.
Well, I guess I can understand one who is so used to coming to idiotic conclusions coming to that conclusion.
b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:So we have a few tards who would choose large corporate interests over Greenpeace - wadda surprise.
When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune..
Well i guess i can understand one who is so easily terrified coming to that conclusion.
Well, I guess I can understand one who is so used to coming to idiotic conclusions coming to that conclusion.
"Idiotic conclusions?" Some internetz tuff guy threatens you and you shit your drawers, squeal about your life being in danger and run into hiding. I would say that it doesn't take a fooking rocket scientist to deduce from that that you are easily terrified. "Idiotic conclusions indeed".
Honibaz
b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune..
Well i guess i can understand one who is so easily terrified coming to that conclusion.
Well, I guess I can understand one who is so used to coming to idiotic conclusions coming to that conclusion.
"Idiotic conclusions?" Some internetz tuff guy threatens you and you shit your drawers, squeal about your life being in danger and run into hiding. I would say that it doesn't take a fooking rocket scientist to deduce from that that you are easily terrified. "Idiotic conclusions indeed".
Symmetry wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Woodruff wrote:When those large corporate interests head into terrorism, I'll change my tune..
Well i guess i can understand one who is so easily terrified coming to that conclusion.
Well, I guess I can understand one who is so used to coming to idiotic conclusions coming to that conclusion.
"Idiotic conclusions?" Some internetz tuff guy threatens you and you shit your drawers, squeal about your life being in danger and run into hiding. I would say that it doesn't take a fooking rocket scientist to deduce from that that you are easily terrified. "Idiotic conclusions indeed".
B.K. A class act, as always.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap