Funny Demotivational Posters

by **isaiah40** on Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm

Click image to enlarge.

Click image to enlarge.

by **nietzsche** on Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:55 pm

by **ljex** on Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:11 pm

nietzsche wrote:

why would you torture everyone by having them look at this, its not even funny

by **Army of GOD** on Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:12 pm

It's sad. By comparison, the girl on the left looked fractionally attractive..

by **notyou2** on Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:23 pm

In Canada there are age limits on bathing suits.

by **saraith** on Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:57 pm

notyou2 wrote:In Canada there are age limits on bathing suits.

Invented at McGill University in 1987.

by **ljex** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:57 am

Army of GOD wrote:It's sad. By comparison, the girl on the left looked fractionally attractive..

the girl, can we call her that? made me want to vomit...

by **TA1LGUNN3R** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:18 am

Does the old woman have implants???? That is terrible...

-TG

by **Georgerx7di** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:44 am

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:If you were to take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the rate at which babies are made.

If you take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the acceleration of their rate at which babies are made.

-TG

And does anyone know what the derivative of acceleration is?

Answer: Jerk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

by **Georgerx7di** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:00 am

Falkomagno wrote:

This is so wrong, I lmfao :lol:

by **grifftron** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:17 am

Georgerx7di wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:

This is so wrong, I lmfao

have a soul man! have a soul...

by **tdans** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:21 am

Phatscotty wrote:

this one made me rofl

by **strike wolf** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:24 am

y

Georgerx7di wrote:
Falkomagno wrote:

This is so wrong, I lmfao

Yeah I hate to be a downer but it really is in poor taste.

by **Falkomagno** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:31 am

You are a so sensitive crowd, I'm touched hahaha :lol:

by **TA1LGUNN3R** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:32 pm

Georgerx7di wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:If you were to take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the rate at which babies are made.

If you take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the acceleration of their rate at which babies are made.

-TG

And does anyone know what the derivative of acceleration is?

Answer: Jerk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

And that's how it all begins.

-TG

by **mgconstruction** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:56 pm

by **Army of GOD** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:00 pm

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Georgerx7di wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:If you were to take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the rate at which babies are made.

If you take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the acceleration of their rate at which babies are made.

-TG

And does anyone know what the derivative of acceleration is?

Answer: Jerk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

And that's how it all begins.

-TG

No, you can't make babies with a jerk...duh...

by **mgconstruction** on Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:12 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Georgerx7di wrote:
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:If you were to take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the rate at which babies are made.

If you take the derivative of that equation, you'll find out the acceleration of their rate at which babies are made.

-TG

And does anyone know what the derivative of acceleration is?

Answer: Jerk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

And that's how it all begins.

-TG

No, you can't make babies with a jerk...duh...