Moderator: Community Team
Brainalack wrote:I've noticed that some players don't seem to read the Game Chat, and thats a problam in team games. Also, some(I've done this before) will make a move before looking at the chat. If there was something at the top of the page that let the player know when a teammate made a post that would salve some problems.
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
Darwins_Bane wrote:There is already an add-on that does that called chatglove
Queen_Herpes wrote:Darwins_Bane wrote:There is already an add-on that does that called chatglove
I hate to sound like a broken record, but there are members who:
-cannot load greasemonkey because of system problems
-are not interested in greasemonkey and scripts
-are bothered by the change in speed when scripts are in use
Personally, with this suggestion it doesn't affect me much, but I see the benefit and would definitely appreciate it if it was incorporated into the site.
Would it be possible to group suggestions that are currently add-ons, scripts, etc, into one place so that the community can voice their concerns for "upgrading" these add-ons, scripts, etc, into the site as part of the site? I know its happening with clickable maps and clickable maps is easily the best one with which to start. Maybe the community could help prioritize which ones would become permanent parts of the site?
TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
PLAYER57832 wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
Which pretty much sounds like "we don't really need this because we already have an add-on to do it".
blakebowling wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
Which pretty much sounds like "we don't really need this because we already have an add-on to do it".
Understand that it is our job to let people know the other methods available to achieve their result. Lack does not have enough time to add every single feature that is suggested to CC, so we must help determine which of those need to be done, and which can be done without, or can wait to be done later.
Queen_Herpes wrote:blakebowling wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
Which pretty much sounds like "we don't really need this because we already have an add-on to do it".
Understand that it is our job to let people know the other methods available to achieve their result. Lack does not have enough time to add every single feature that is suggested to CC, so we must help determine which of those need to be done, and which can be done without, or can wait to be done later.
Can we address this part of my post:
"Would it be possible to group suggestions that are currently add-ons, scripts, etc, into one place so that the community can voice their concerns for "upgrading" these add-ons, scripts, etc, into the site as part of the site? I know its happening with clickable maps and clickable maps is easily the best one with which to start. Maybe the community could help prioritize which ones would become permanent parts of the site?"
TheForgivenOne wrote:Queen_Herpes wrote:blakebowling wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
Which pretty much sounds like "we don't really need this because we already have an add-on to do it".
Understand that it is our job to let people know the other methods available to achieve their result. Lack does not have enough time to add every single feature that is suggested to CC, so we must help determine which of those need to be done, and which can be done without, or can wait to be done later.
Can we address this part of my post:
"Would it be possible to group suggestions that are currently add-ons, scripts, etc, into one place so that the community can voice their concerns for "upgrading" these add-ons, scripts, etc, into the site as part of the site? I know its happening with clickable maps and clickable maps is easily the best one with which to start. Maybe the community could help prioritize which ones would become permanent parts of the site?"
I could find this plausible. I would do it, but I am currently swamped doing other things in real life. It would be like the Medal Suggestions thread. Just Pm me a list of links to threads, and I will create the thread, lock it to prevent posts in it until I have merged everything in there, then unlock it. Or we could have the first post of that thread have a link to every thread with an Add-on - If you want to do it this way, you can create it.
blakebowling wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
Which pretty much sounds like "we don't really need this because we already have an add-on to do it".
Understand that it is our job to let people know the other methods available to achieve their result. Lack does not have enough time to add every single feature that is suggested to CC, so we must help determine which of those need to be done, and which can be done without, or can wait to be done later.
PLAYER57832 wrote:blakebowling wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:
Where in his post did he ever say "This is here already, we don't need it on the site."? He was giving the OP the knowledge that it is available as an Add-on.
Which pretty much sounds like "we don't really need this because we already have an add-on to do it".
Understand that it is our job to let people know the other methods available to achieve their result. Lack does not have enough time to add every single feature that is suggested to CC, so we must help determine which of those need to be done, and which can be done without, or can wait to be done later.
Which gets us back to my point... , the fact that so many of these things are addons means there is a demand. If anything, the fact that an add-on exists should be seen as MORE evidence this is needed to be encorporated within CC itself, not less.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users