jay_a2j wrote:Dang, I should of been a lawyer!
No, you shouldn't "of"
Moderator: Community Team
jay_a2j wrote:Dang, I should of been a lawyer!
thegreekdog wrote:As an aside - Jay, if you were a lawyer you'd be computer illiterate like me...
Player - next time you might want to pm rdsrds2120 who is much more adept at computer issues than I am.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
natty_dread wrote:What is liberalism?
natty_dread wrote:What is liberalism?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Nobunaga wrote:Symmetry wrote:Nobunaga wrote:CreepersWiener wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:3.
If you notice...only the white people are carrying American flags. I bet they are liberals!
... The civil rights act of 1964 passed because the huge majority of Republicans voted for it while a majority of Democrats did not.
... I guess the Republicans were considered the liberals back then. Indeed, the vast majority of African Americans were Republican.
... Then came the plantation policies of the Dems... and look at American inner cities today.
... But the white dudes holding the flags, certianly liberal for their time, party irrelevant.
...
Hilarious. I didn't get the "plantation policies" reference though. Everything else was a genius parody.
... For your reference.
http://www.unclesamsplantation.com/
A Dictionary wrote:1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2.
( often initial capital letter ) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3.
of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4.
favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5.
favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6.
of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7.
free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8.
open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9.
characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts: a liberal donor.
10.
given freely or abundantly; generous: a liberal donation.
11.
not strict or rigorous; free; not literal: a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12.
of, pertaining to, or based on the liberal arts.
13.
of, pertaining to, or befitting a freeman.
Symmetry wrote:That was great- I really liked this as the primary point: "The welfare system enslaves the poor on a subsidized, legal plantation"
You'd literally have to be a Nazi to consider that a valid comparison.
jay_a2j wrote:natty_dread wrote:What is liberalism?
It's not what it is, it's what it has become. Liberal used to be a good term but it has morphed into something sinister, something that small children all over the world run from. (and many sane adults)
Liberalism: The haunting fear someone, somewhere, can help themselves.
I personally view it as people who want all kinds of crazy "rights" all the while trying their best to limit the rights of others. ie. San Francisco has BANNED Happy Meal toys in their city! (It might cause kids to eat the food and GAIN WEIGHT!) So of course the libs came up with a solution....
Aradhus wrote:Just because a person defines themselves as being A does not mean they are consistenly A. Judge not A, but the person claiming to be A whilst being Z-.
Aradhus wrote:Just because a person defines themselves as being A does not mean they are consistenly A. Judge not A, but the person claiming to be A whilst being Z-.
Army of GOD wrote:Aradhus wrote:Just because a person defines themselves as being A does not mean they are consistenly A. Judge not A, but the person claiming to be A whilst being Z-.
What the Hell is Z-?
Mr_Adams wrote:Aradhus wrote:Just because a person defines themselves as being A does not mean they are consistenly A. Judge not A, but the person claiming to be A whilst being Z-.
Wise advise comes from all sides. Are you a fan of Aristotle?
Aradhus wrote:Mr_Adams wrote:Aradhus wrote:Just because a person defines themselves as being A does not mean they are consistenly A. Judge not A, but the person claiming to be A whilst being Z-.
Wise advise comes from all sides. Are you a fan of Aristotle?
The football player? Nah, his hair is too greasy.
Mr_Adams wrote:Legally mandated discrimination against majorities
jay_a2j wrote:natty_dread wrote:What is liberalism?
It's not what it is, it's what it has become. Liberal used to be a good term but it has morphed into something sinister, something that small children all over the world run from. (and many sane adults)
Liberalism: The haunting fear someone, somewhere, can help themselves.
jay_a2j wrote:I personally view it as people who want all kinds of crazy "rights" all the while trying their best to limit the rights of others.
radiojake wrote:Mr_Adams wrote:Legally mandated discrimination against majorities
Are you fucking serious?
Mr_Adams wrote:radiojake wrote:Mr_Adams wrote:Legally mandated discrimination against majorities
Are you fucking serious?
Have you read the contents of executive order 11246? I have. It is still in effect.
radiojake wrote:Mr_Adams wrote:radiojake wrote:Mr_Adams wrote:Legally mandated discrimination against majorities
Are you fucking serious?
Have you read the contents of executive order 11246? I have. It is still in effect.
Ah, you have a problem with affirmative action - I see - While it's not a perfect system, you can not call it legally mandated discrimination against majorities.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
BigBallinStalin wrote:Yeah, it's still discrimination based on skin color.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Mr_Adams wrote:And we are just supposed to lay down and take it "for the greater good" or some bull.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users