Moderator: Community Team
chapcrap wrote:I don't think so. Escalating spoils should not be changed in that way.
It's just making them more like Flat Rate.
Pedronicus wrote:It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
chapcrap wrote:Pedronicus wrote:It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
I don't understand why that is better...
Pedronicus wrote:the up and down the mountain idea with a peak of 35 sounds fairer. It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
Pedronicus wrote:chapcrap wrote:Pedronicus wrote:It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
I don't understand why that is better...
Have you ever played a real game of risk? from memory, the esc. increments were 3 not 2, then going up to 5. a more even and constant increase in armies makes for a fairer game
AndyDufresne wrote:Pedronicus wrote:the up and down the mountain idea with a peak of 35 sounds fairer. It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
I'm not sure I'd say it is fairer, it just makes strategic cashing different. I'm afraid that the Ascent-Descent mountain scheme would just lead to more escalating game stalemates than normal escalating already does.
Hm, but all of it is food for thought!
--Andy
Pedronicus wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Pedronicus wrote:the up and down the mountain idea with a peak of 35 sounds fairer. It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
I'm not sure I'd say it is fairer, it just makes strategic cashing different. I'm afraid that the Ascent-Descent mountain scheme would just lead to more escalating game stalemates than normal escalating already does.
Hm, but all of it is food for thought!
--Andy
More esc stalemates?
Kindly point out some esc stalemate games in play right now and I'll shut up
Pedronicus wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Pedronicus wrote:the up and down the mountain idea with a peak of 35 sounds fairer. It's even better if the increase in armies is 3, so make the peak 36.
I'm not sure I'd say it is fairer, it just makes strategic cashing different. I'm afraid that the Ascent-Descent mountain scheme would just lead to more escalating game stalemates than normal escalating already does.
Hm, but all of it is food for thought!
--Andy
More esc stalemates?
Kindly point out some esc stalemate games in play right now and I'll shut up
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users